Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GLMD vs GNFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
GLMD vs GNFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1M | $448M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $117M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-16M |
| Gross Margin | — | 104.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 0.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 256.9x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $62M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $82M |
GLMD vs GNFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Galmed Pharmaceutic… (GLMD) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Genfit S.A. (GNFT) | 100 | 118.6 | +18.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GLMD vs GNFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GLMD is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 2.6% margin vs GNFT's -14.1%
GNFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.99
- Rev growth 134.6%, EPS growth 105.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.8%
- -59.6% 10Y total return vs GLMD's -99.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 134.6% revenue growth vs GLMD's -114.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.6% margin vs GNFT's -14.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs GLMD's 1.98 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +108.1% vs GLMD's -51.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -9.0% ROA vs GLMD's -38.0%, ROIC 4.5% vs -41.4% |
GLMD vs GNFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GLMD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GNFT and GLMD operate at a comparable scale, with $117M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $117M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $4M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | -$47M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +104.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +0.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -14.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -40.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -41.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +70.4% | -140.0% |
Valuation Metrics
GLMD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $448M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$4M | $425M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.08x | 256.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 73.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 5.75x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 5.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 27.10x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GNFT leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GNFT delivers a -23.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-23 in annual profit, vs $-42 for GLMD. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GNFT scores 6/9 vs GLMD's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -42.5% | -23.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -38.0% | -9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -41.4% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -41.6% | +3.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.90x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$20M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $82M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $62M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -19.18x | -0.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GNFT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GNFT five years ago would be worth $20,341 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14 for GLMD. Over the past 12 months, GNFT leads with a +108.1% total return vs GLMD's -51.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GNFT at 28.0% vs GLMD's -78.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.8% | +48.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -51.1% | +108.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.1% | +109.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +103.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -59.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -78.9% | +28.0% |
Risk & Volatility
GNFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GNFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GLMD's 1.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GNFT currently trades 87.7% from its 52-week high vs GLMD's 26.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.98x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.34 | $10.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.41 | $3.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +26.1% | +87.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.9 | 71.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.7M | 4K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $13.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GNFT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). GLMD leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics).
GLMD vs GNFT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GLMD or GNFT a better buy right now?
Genfit S.
A. (GNFT) offers the better valuation at 256. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Genfit S. A. (GNFT) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GLMD or GNFT?
Over the past 5 years, Genfit S.
A. (GNFT) delivered a total return of +103. 4%, compared to -99. 9% for Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (GLMD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GNFT returned -59. 6% versus GLMD's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GLMD or GNFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Genfit S.
A. (GNFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd. 's 1. 98β — meaning GLMD is approximately 100% more volatile than GNFT relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — GLMD or GNFT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Genfit S.
A. grew EPS 105. 2% year-over-year, compared to 73. 0% for Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GLMD or GNFT?
Genfit S.
A. (GNFT) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 2% net margin versus 0. 0% for Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd. — meaning it keeps 2. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GNFT leads at 4. 9% versus 0. 0% for GLMD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GNFT leads at 99. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GLMD or GNFT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is GLMD or GNFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Genfit S.
A. (GNFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99)). Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (GLMD) carries a higher beta of 1. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GNFT: -59. 6%, GLMD: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GLMD and GNFT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GLMD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GNFT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.