Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GLMD vs MDGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
GLMD vs MDGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1M | $12.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.13B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-309M |
| Gross Margin | — | 93.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -27.7% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $354M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $199M |
GLMD vs MDGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Galmed Pharmaceutic… (GLMD) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Madrigal Pharmaceut… (MDGL) | 100 | 465.2 | +365.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GLMD vs MDGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GLMD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 73.0%
- 2.6% margin vs MDGL's -27.3%
MDGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.57
- 37.6% 10Y total return vs GLMD's -99.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 58.8%, current ratio 4.01x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 432.1% revenue growth vs GLMD's -114.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.6% margin vs MDGL's -27.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs GLMD's 1.79 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +82.9% vs GLMD's -57.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -25.4% ROA vs GLMD's -38.0%, ROIC -29.4% vs -41.4% |
GLMD vs MDGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GLMD vs MDGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GLMD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDGL and GLMD operate at a comparable scale, with $1.1B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | -$312M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$309M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | -$272M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +93.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -27.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -27.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -24.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +126.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +70.4% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GLMD and MDGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $12.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$4M | $12.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.08x | -42.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 12.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.04x | 20.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MDGL leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GLMD delivers a -42.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-42 in annual profit, vs $-50 for MDGL. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MDGL scores 3/9 vs GLMD's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -42.5% | -50.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -38.0% | -25.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -41.4% | -29.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -41.6% | -32.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $156M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $199M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $354M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -19.18x | -17.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MDGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MDGL five years ago would be worth $42,596 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13 for GLMD. Over the past 12 months, MDGL leads with a +82.9% total return vs GLMD's -57.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MDGL at 20.4% vs GLMD's -78.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.7% | -9.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -57.0% | +82.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | +74.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +326.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +3755.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -78.7% | +20.4% |
Risk & Volatility
MDGL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MDGL is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GLMD's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MDGL currently trades 87.8% from its 52-week high vs GLMD's 26.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.79x | 0.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.34 | $615.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.41 | $265.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +26.8% | +87.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.3 | 45.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.7M | 312K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $705.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MDGL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). GLMD leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
GLMD vs MDGL: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GLMD or MDGL a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GLMD or MDGL?
Over the past 5 years, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) delivered a total return of +326. 0%, compared to -99. 9% for Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (GLMD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MDGL returned +37. 6% versus GLMD's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GLMD or MDGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd. 's 1. 79β — meaning GLMD is approximately 217% more volatile than MDGL relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — GLMD or MDGL?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
grew EPS 73. 0% year-over-year, compared to 41. 3% for Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GLMD or MDGL?
Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
(GLMD) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -30. 1% for Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GLMD leads at 0. 0% versus -31. 3% for MDGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MDGL leads at 94. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GLMD or MDGL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is GLMD or MDGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57)). Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (GLMD) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MDGL: +37. 6%, GLMD: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GLMD and MDGL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GLMD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MDGL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.