Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
GLUE vs LLY vs VRTX vs CRL vs IQV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
GLUE vs LLY vs VRTX vs CRL vs IQV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $1.19B | $1.07T | $113.17B | $9.03B | $30.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $43M | $72.25B | $12.26B | $4.03B | $16.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-130M | $25.27B | $4.34B | $-185M | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | 95.3% | 83.5% | 86.3% | 31.9% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | -345.2% | 45.9% | 39.0% | 11.8% | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 30.9x | 23.0x | 16.9x | 14.2x |
| Total Debt | $39M | $42.50B | $3.88B | $3.07B | $16.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $130M | $7.16B | $5.09B | $214M | $1.98B |
GLUE vs LLY vs VRTX vs CRL vs IQV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monte Rosa Therapeu… (GLUE) | 100 | 80.3 | -19.7% |
| Eli Lilly and Compa… (LLY) | 100 | 493.6 | +393.6% |
| Vertex Pharmaceutic… (VRTX) | 100 | 220.7 | +120.7% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 50.7 | -49.3% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 74.9 | -25.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GLUE vs LLY vs VRTX vs CRL vs IQV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GLUE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 63.5% revenue growth vs CRL's -0.9%
- +270.6% vs VRTX's -3.3%
LLY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 0.5%
- Rev growth 44.7%, EPS growth 96.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.7%
- 14.8% 10Y total return vs VRTX's 391.4%
- Beta 0.53, yield 0.5%, current ratio 1.58x
VRTX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 20.8%, current ratio 2.90x
- 35.4% margin vs GLUE's -302.7%
Among these 5 stocks, CRL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
IQV is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.35 vs VRTX's 2.78
- Lower P/E (14.2x vs 16.9x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 63.5% revenue growth vs CRL's -0.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.2x vs 16.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.4% margin vs GLUE's -302.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs CRL's 1.39 | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 11-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +270.6% vs VRTX's -3.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.7% ROA vs GLUE's -25.9%, ROIC 41.8% vs -44.2% |
GLUE vs LLY vs VRTX vs CRL vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GLUE vs LLY vs VRTX vs CRL vs IQV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LLY leads in 4 of 6 categories
IQV leads 1 • GLUE leads 1 • VRTX leads 0 • CRL leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LLY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LLY is the larger business by revenue, generating $72.2B annually — 1682.1x GLUE's $43M. VRTX is the more profitable business, keeping 35.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GLUE's -3.0%. On growth, LLY holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $43M | $72.2B | $12.3B | $4.0B | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$140M | $34.7B | $4.9B | $824M | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$130M | $25.3B | $4.3B | -$185M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$20M | $13.6B | $3.7B | $391M | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +95.3% | +83.5% | +86.3% | +31.9% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | +45.9% | +39.0% | +11.8% | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | +35.0% | +35.4% | -4.6% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -45.8% | +18.8% | +30.3% | +9.7% | +16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -95.0% | +55.5% | +7.8% | +1.2% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.2% | +169.9% | +61.4% | -160.0% | +15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IQV leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.1x trailing earnings, IQV trades at a 53% valuation discount to LLY's 49.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IQV offers better value at 0.57x vs VRTX's 3.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $1.07T | $113.2B | $9.0B | $30.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $1.11T | $112.0B | $11.9B | $45.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -39.64x | 49.37x | 29.04x | -64.44x | 23.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 30.95x | 23.05x | 16.90x | 14.16x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.71x | 3.51x | — | 0.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 35.38x | 22.54x | 13.04x | 13.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.60x | 16.42x | 9.37x | 2.25x | 1.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.50x | 38.34x | 6.15x | 2.89x | 4.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 119.31x | 35.43x | 17.42x | 15.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LLY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LLY delivers a 101.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $101 in annual profit, vs $-41 for GLUE. GLUE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LLY scores 8/9 vs IQV's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -41.0% | +101.2% | +23.9% | -5.7% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -25.9% | +22.7% | +17.1% | -2.5% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -44.2% | +41.8% | +23.0% | +6.3% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.3% | +46.6% | +23.1% | +8.1% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 1.60x | 0.21x | 0.95x | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$91M | $35.3B | -$1.2B | $2.9B | $14.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $130M | $7.2B | $5.1B | $214M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $39M | $42.5B | $3.9B | $3.1B | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 35.68x | 488.09x | 4.29x | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GLUE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LLY five years ago would be worth $51,207 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,277 for CRL. Over the past 12 months, GLUE leads with a +270.6% total return vs VRTX's -3.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GLUE at 38.6% vs IQV's -5.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.1% | +5.2% | -1.6% | -7.4% | -19.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +270.6% | +40.3% | -3.3% | +23.5% | +14.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.2% | +158.2% | +30.6% | -8.7% | -14.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.9% | +412.1% | +128.4% | -47.2% | -25.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.9% | +1484.6% | +391.4% | +122.4% | +177.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +38.6% | +37.2% | +9.3% | -3.0% | -5.0% |
Risk & Volatility
LLY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LLY is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRL's 1.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LLY currently trades 95.8% from its 52-week high vs GLUE's 70.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 0.53x | 0.68x | 1.39x | 1.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.77 | $1182.73 | $507.92 | $228.88 | $247.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.12 | $623.78 | $362.50 | $143.06 | $153.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.8% | +95.8% | +87.6% | +81.9% | +73.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.0 | 70.0 | 53.9 | 60.8 | 54.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 815K | 2.6M | 1.1M | 767K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
LLY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GLUE as "Buy", LLY as "Buy", VRTX as "Buy", CRL as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 74.1% upside for GLUE (target: $32) vs 12.0% for LLY (target: $1269). LLY is the only dividend payer here at 0.53% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.75 | $1268.94 | $553.93 | $213.17 | $222.22 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 45 | 56 | 37 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.5% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 11 | — | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.00 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | +1.8% | +4.0% | +4.0% |
LLY leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IQV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
GLUE vs LLY vs VRTX vs CRL vs IQV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GLUE or LLY or VRTX or CRL or IQV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc.
(GLUE) is the stronger pick with 63. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) offers the better valuation at 23. 1x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc. (GLUE) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GLUE or LLY or VRTX or CRL or IQV?
On trailing P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the cheapest at 23. 1x versus Eli Lilly and Company at 49. 4x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IQVIA Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 35x versus Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's 2. 78x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GLUE or LLY or VRTX or CRL or IQV?
Over the past 5 years, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) delivered a total return of +412.
1%, compared to -47. 2% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LLY returned +1485% versus GLUE's -13. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GLUE or LLY or VRTX or CRL or IQV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
53β versus Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. 's 1. 39β — meaning CRL is approximately 162% more volatile than LLY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc. (GLUE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GLUE or LLY or VRTX or CRL or IQV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc.
(GLUE) is pulling ahead at 63. 5% versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated grew EPS 836. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LLY leads at 31. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GLUE or LLY or VRTX or CRL or IQV?
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
7% net margin versus -31. 2% for Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LLY leads at 45. 6% versus -43. 8% for GLUE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GLUE leads at 93. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GLUE or LLY or VRTX or CRL or IQV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's 2. 78x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 30. 9x for Eli Lilly and Company — 16. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GLUE: 74. 1% to $31. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — GLUE or LLY or VRTX or CRL or IQV?
In this comparison, LLY (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. GLUE, VRTX, CRL, IQV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GLUE or LLY or VRTX or CRL or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
53), 0. 5% yield, +1485% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LLY: +1485%, GLUE: -13. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GLUE and LLY and VRTX and CRL and IQV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GLUE is a small-cap high-growth stock; LLY is a mega-cap high-growth stock; VRTX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. LLY pays a dividend while GLUE, VRTX, CRL, IQV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.