Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GLXG vs KFRC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
GLXG vs KFRC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $2M | $769M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $1.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $237K | $35M |
| Gross Margin | 23.0% | 27.2% |
| Operating Margin | 11.8% | 3.8% |
| Forward P/E | 2.5x | 17.5x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $2M |
GLXG vs KFRC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Galaxy Payroll Grou… (GLXG) | 100 | 1.7 | -98.3% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 68.4 | -31.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GLXG vs KFRC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GLXG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.50, yield 68.7%
- Rev growth -4.3%, EPS growth -34.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 36.5%, current ratio 0.86x
KFRC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 187.9% 10Y total return vs GLXG's -97.6%
- +16.7% vs GLXG's -82.9%
- 9.2% ROA vs GLXG's 0.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -4.3% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.5x vs 17.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.7% margin vs KFRC's 2.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs KFRC's 0.53, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 68.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KFRC's 3.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.7% vs GLXG's -82.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs GLXG's 0.9% |
GLXG vs KFRC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GLXG vs KFRC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GLXG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KFRC is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 544.5x GLXG's $2M. GLXG is the more profitable business, keeping 9.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KFRC's 2.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $318,759 | $56M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $236,887 | $35M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $370,649 | $43M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +27.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +3.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +2.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +3.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | +0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.4% | +2.2% |
Valuation Metrics
GLXG leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.5x trailing earnings, GLXG trades at a 88% valuation discount to KFRC's 21.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GLXG's 0.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KFRC's 15.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $769M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $673,134 | $836M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.50x | 21.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.64x | 15.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.46x | 0.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.13x | 6.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.07x | 16.42x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GLXG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $4 for GLXG. GLXG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KFRC's 0.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GLXG scores 6/9 vs KFRC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.7% | +27.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +9.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +19.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +77.8% | +20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.36x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | $68M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 49.35x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KFRC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KFRC five years ago would be worth $8,200 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $238 for GLXG. Over the past 12 months, KFRC leads with a +16.7% total return vs GLXG's -82.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KFRC at -5.6% vs GLXG's -71.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -39.8% | +35.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -82.9% | +16.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | -15.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | -18.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | +187.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -71.2% | -5.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GLXG and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GLXG is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KFRC's 0.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KFRC currently trades 88.6% from its 52-week high vs GLXG's 13.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.50x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.81 | $47.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.95 | $24.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.6% | +88.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 24.1 | 71.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 307K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GLXG and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, GLXG offers the higher dividend yield at 68.72% vs KFRC's 3.68%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $71.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +68.7% | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $5.71 | $1.55 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.6% |
GLXG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). KFRC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
GLXG vs KFRC: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GLXG or KFRC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG) is the stronger pick with -4.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG) offers the better valuation at 2. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kforce Inc. (KFRC) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GLXG or KFRC?
On trailing P/E, Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG) is the cheapest at 2.
5x versus Kforce Inc. at 21. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GLXG or KFRC?
Over the past 5 years, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) delivered a total return of -18. 0%, compared to -97. 6% for Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KFRC returned +187. 9% versus GLXG's -97. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GLXG or KFRC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
50β versus Kforce Inc. 's 0. 53β — meaning KFRC is approximately 7% more volatile than GLXG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 56% for Kforce Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GLXG or KFRC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG) is pulling ahead at -4.
3% versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kforce Inc. grew EPS -25. 2% year-over-year, compared to -34. 9% for Galaxy Payroll Group Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, GLXG leads at -4. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GLXG or KFRC?
Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
3% net margin versus 2. 6% for Kforce Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GLXG leads at 23. 3% versus 3. 8% for KFRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GLXG leads at 53. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — GLXG or KFRC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG) offers the highest yield at 68. 7%, versus 3. 7% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC).
08Is GLXG or KFRC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 3. 7% yield, +187. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +187. 9%, GLXG: -97. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between GLXG and KFRC?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GLXG is a small-cap deep-value stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare KFRC vs KELYA
KELYA is one of the most direct listed alternatives to KFRC.
Compare GLXG vs HCKT
HCKT is one of the most direct listed alternatives to GLXG.
Expand With KELYA + HSII
KELYA and HSII are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.