Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GLXG vs HCKT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
GLXG vs HCKT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $2M | $257M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $297M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $237K | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 23.0% | 30.1% |
| Operating Margin | 11.8% | 10.5% |
| Forward P/E | 2.5x | 6.2x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $80M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $18M |
GLXG vs HCKT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Galaxy Payroll Grou… (GLXG) | 100 | 1.7 | -98.3% |
| The Hackett Group, … (HCKT) | 100 | 38.9 | -61.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GLXG vs HCKT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GLXG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.50, yield 68.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 36.5%, current ratio 0.86x
- Beta 0.50, yield 68.7%, current ratio 0.86x
HCKT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -2.6%, EPS growth -55.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.3%
- -5.2% 10Y total return vs GLXG's -97.6%
- -2.6% revenue growth vs GLXG's -4.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -2.6% revenue growth vs GLXG's -4.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.5x vs 6.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.7% margin vs HCKT's 4.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs HCKT's 1.10, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 68.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HCKT's 4.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -58.9% vs GLXG's -82.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.0% ROA vs GLXG's 0.9% |
GLXG vs HCKT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GLXG vs HCKT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GLXG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HCKT is the larger business by revenue, generating $297M annually — 121.5x GLXG's $2M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 9.7% (GLXG) to 4.7% (HCKT). On growth, GLXG holds the edge at +2.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $297M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $318,759 | $35M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $236,887 | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $370,649 | $25M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +30.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +10.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +4.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +8.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | -11.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.4% | +54.5% |
Valuation Metrics
GLXG leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.5x trailing earnings, GLXG trades at a 88% valuation discount to HCKT's 21.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GLXG's 0.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HCKT's 10.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $257M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $673,134 | $319M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.50x | 21.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.96x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.64x | 10.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.46x | 0.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.13x | 4.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.07x | 7.94x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GLXG leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HCKT delivers a 15.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $4 for GLXG. GLXG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HCKT's 1.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GLXG scores 6/9 vs HCKT's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.7% | +15.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +7.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +16.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +77.8% | +18.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.36x | 1.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | $61M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $18M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $80M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 49.35x | 37.81x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HCKT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HCKT five years ago would be worth $7,598 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $238 for GLXG. Over the past 12 months, HCKT leads with a -58.9% total return vs GLXG's -82.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HCKT at -14.5% vs GLXG's -71.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -39.8% | -47.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -82.9% | -58.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | -37.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | -24.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | -5.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -71.2% | -14.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GLXG and HCKT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GLXG is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HCKT's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HCKT currently trades 38.5% from its 52-week high vs GLXG's 13.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.50x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.81 | $26.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.95 | $9.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.6% | +38.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 24.1 | 56.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 293K |
Analyst Outlook
GLXG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, GLXG offers the higher dividend yield at 68.72% vs HCKT's 4.63%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $20.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +68.7% | +4.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $5.71 | $0.47 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +26.9% |
GLXG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HCKT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
GLXG vs HCKT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GLXG or HCKT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Hackett Group, Inc.
(HCKT) is the stronger pick with -2. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 3% for Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG). Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG) offers the better valuation at 2. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Hackett Group, Inc. (HCKT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GLXG or HCKT?
On trailing P/E, Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG) is the cheapest at 2.
5x versus The Hackett Group, Inc. at 21. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GLXG or HCKT?
Over the past 5 years, The Hackett Group, Inc.
(HCKT) delivered a total return of -24. 0%, compared to -97. 6% for Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HCKT returned -5. 2% versus GLXG's -97. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GLXG or HCKT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
50β versus The Hackett Group, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning HCKT is approximately 121% more volatile than GLXG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 117% for The Hackett Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GLXG or HCKT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Hackett Group, Inc.
(HCKT) is pulling ahead at -2. 6% versus -4. 3% for Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Galaxy Payroll Group Limited grew EPS -34. 9% year-over-year, compared to -55. 2% for The Hackett Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HCKT leads at 1. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GLXG or HCKT?
Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
3% net margin versus 4. 2% for The Hackett Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GLXG leads at 23. 3% versus 8. 7% for HCKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GLXG leads at 53. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — GLXG or HCKT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG) offers the highest yield at 68. 7%, versus 4. 6% for The Hackett Group, Inc. (HCKT).
08Is GLXG or HCKT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
50), 68. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GLXG: -97. 6%, HCKT: -5. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between GLXG and HCKT?
These companies operate in different sectors (GLXG (Industrials) and HCKT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GLXG is a small-cap deep-value stock; HCKT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare HCKT vs FORR
FORR is one of the most direct listed alternatives to HCKT.
Compare GLXG vs KFRC
KFRC is one of the most direct listed alternatives to GLXG.
Expand With KFRC + KELYA
KFRC and KELYA are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.