Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GLXG vs TBI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
GLXG vs TBI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $2M | $182M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $1.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $237K | $-53M |
| Gross Margin | 23.0% | 28.4% |
| Operating Margin | 11.8% | -2.6% |
| Forward P/E | 2.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $171M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $25M |
GLXG vs TBI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Galaxy Payroll Grou… (GLXG) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
| TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI) | 100 | 76.2 | -23.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GLXG vs TBI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GLXG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.50, yield 61.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 36.5%, current ratio 0.86x
- Beta 0.50, yield 61.5%, current ratio 0.86x
TBI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.1%, EPS growth 61.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.5%
- -68.4% 10Y total return vs GLXG's -97.3%
- 3.1% revenue growth vs GLXG's -4.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.1% revenue growth vs GLXG's -4.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.7% margin vs TBI's -4.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs TBI's 1.13, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 61.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +51.0% vs GLXG's -80.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.9% ROA vs TBI's -8.1% |
GLXG vs TBI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GLXG vs TBI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GLXG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TBI is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 510.3x GLXG's $2M. GLXG is the more profitable business, keeping 9.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TBI's -4.3%. On growth, GLXG holds the edge at +2.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $318,759 | -$10M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $236,887 | -$53M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $370,649 | -$60M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +28.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | -2.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | -4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | -4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.4% | -37.5% |
Valuation Metrics
TBI leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GLXG's 0.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TBI's 160.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $182M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $879,829 | $329M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.80x | -3.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.83x | 160.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.51x | 0.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.38x | 0.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.31x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GLXG leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GLXG delivers a 3.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-19 for TBI. GLXG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TBI's 0.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GLXG scores 6/9 vs TBI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.7% | -18.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | -8.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -5.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +77.8% | -5.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.36x | 0.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | $146M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $171M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 49.35x | -46.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TBI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TBI five years ago would be worth $2,130 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $266 for GLXG. Over the past 12 months, TBI leads with a +51.0% total return vs GLXG's -80.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TBI at -26.4% vs GLXG's -70.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.7% | +36.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -80.4% | +51.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.3% | -60.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.3% | -78.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.3% | -68.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -70.1% | -26.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GLXG and TBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GLXG is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TBI's 1.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TBI currently trades 77.2% from its 52-week high vs GLXG's 15.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.50x | 1.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.81 | $7.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.95 | $3.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.2% | +77.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 24.7 | 83.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 386K |
Analyst Outlook
GLXG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
GLXG is the only dividend payer here at 61.50% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +61.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $5.71 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% |
GLXG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TBI leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
GLXG vs TBI: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GLXG or TBI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TrueBlue, Inc.
(TBI) is the stronger pick with 3. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 3% for Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG). Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG) offers the better valuation at 2. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GLXG or TBI?
Over the past 5 years, TrueBlue, Inc.
(TBI) delivered a total return of -78. 7%, compared to -97. 3% for Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TBI returned -68. 4% versus GLXG's -97. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GLXG or TBI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
50β versus TrueBlue, Inc. 's 1. 13β — meaning TBI is approximately 129% more volatile than GLXG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 62% for TrueBlue, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GLXG or TBI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TrueBlue, Inc.
(TBI) is pulling ahead at 3. 1% versus -4. 3% for Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TrueBlue, Inc. grew EPS 61. 4% year-over-year, compared to -34. 9% for Galaxy Payroll Group Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, GLXG leads at -4. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GLXG or TBI?
Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
3% net margin versus -3. 0% for TrueBlue, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GLXG leads at 23. 3% versus -1. 7% for TBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GLXG leads at 53. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GLXG or TBI?
In this comparison, GLXG (61.
5% yield) pays a dividend. TBI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is GLXG or TBI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
50), 61. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GLXG: -97. 3%, TBI: -68. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GLXG and TBI?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GLXG is a small-cap deep-value stock; TBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. GLXG pays a dividend while TBI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.