Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GMHS vs GOOGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
GMHS vs GOOGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $54M | $4.81T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $137M | $422.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $160.21B |
| Gross Margin | 51.9% | 60.4% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 32.7% |
| Forward P/E | 13.0x | 29.6x |
| Total Debt | $522K | $59.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $30.71B |
GMHS vs GOOGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gamehaus Holdings I… (GMHS) | 100 | 8.9 | -91.1% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 210.2 | +110.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GMHS vs GOOGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GMHS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta -0.20, Low D/E 1.6%, current ratio 2.82x
- Beta -0.20, current ratio 2.82x
- Lower P/E (13.0x vs 29.6x)
GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 34.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.5%
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs GMHS's -91.2%
- 15.1% revenue growth vs GMHS's -18.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs GMHS's -18.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.0x vs 29.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs GMHS's 5.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (1.6% vs 14.3%) | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +144.2% vs GMHS's -20.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs GMHS's 12.8%, ROIC 25.1% vs 14.8% |
GMHS vs GOOGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GMHS vs GOOGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 3076.0x GMHS's $137M. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GMHS's 5.2%. On growth, GOOGL holds the edge at +21.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $137M | $422.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $161.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $160.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | $73.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.9% | +60.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +32.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | +37.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.0% | +17.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.9% | +21.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -38.9% | +81.9% |
Valuation Metrics
GMHS leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.0x trailing earnings, GMHS trades at a 65% valuation discount to GOOGL's 36.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GMHS's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GOOGL's 32.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $54M | $4.81T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $39M | $4.84T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.00x | 36.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 29.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.85x | 32.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.45x | 11.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.56x | 11.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.60x | 65.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $17 for GMHS. GMHS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GOOGL's 0.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOGL scores 7/9 vs GMHS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.9% | +39.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.8% | +27.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.8% | +25.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.0% | +30.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15M | $28.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $30.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $521,581 | $59.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 392.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $34,180 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $885 for GMHS. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +144.2% total return vs GMHS's -20.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs GMHS's -55.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.2% | +26.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -20.6% | +144.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.2% | +270.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.2% | +241.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.2% | +1001.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -55.4% | +54.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GMHS and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GMHS is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GOOGL's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs GMHS's 37.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.20x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.66 | $399.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.68 | $147.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.6% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.0 | 81.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 28.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
GOOGL is the only dividend payer here at 0.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $406.28 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 82 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% |
GOOGL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GMHS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
GMHS vs GOOGL: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GMHS or GOOGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger pick with 15. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 7% for Gamehaus Holdings Inc. (GMHS). Gamehaus Holdings Inc. (GMHS) offers the better valuation at 13. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) a "Buy" — based on 82 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GMHS or GOOGL?
On trailing P/E, Gamehaus Holdings Inc.
(GMHS) is the cheapest at 13. 0x versus Alphabet Inc. at 36. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GMHS or GOOGL?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +241. 8%, compared to -91. 2% for Gamehaus Holdings Inc. (GMHS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +1002% versus GMHS's -91. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GMHS or GOOGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gamehaus Holdings Inc.
(GMHS) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 20β versus Alphabet Inc. 's 1. 26β — meaning GOOGL is approximately -742% more volatile than GMHS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gamehaus Holdings Inc. (GMHS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 14% for Alphabet Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GMHS or GOOGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is pulling ahead at 15. 1% versus -18. 7% for Gamehaus Holdings Inc. (GMHS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alphabet Inc. grew EPS 34. 5% year-over-year, compared to -48. 7% for Gamehaus Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GOOGL leads at 12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GMHS or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus 3. 4% for Gamehaus Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus 2. 9% for GMHS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOOGL leads at 59. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — GMHS or GOOGL?
In this comparison, GOOGL (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. GMHS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is GMHS or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gamehaus Holdings Inc.
(GMHS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 20)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GMHS: -91. 2%, GOOGL: +1002%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between GMHS and GOOGL?
These companies operate in different sectors (GMHS (Technology) and GOOGL (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GMHS is a small-cap deep-value stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare GOOGL vs META
META is one of the most direct listed alternatives to GOOGL.
Compare GMHS vs GDEV
GDEV is one of the most direct listed alternatives to GMHS.
Expand With META + MSFT
META and MSFT are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.