GNK
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$1.10B
5Y Perf.+434.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
GNK vs SHIP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$342M
5Y Perf.-17.4%
GNK vs SHIP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | GNK | SHIP |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $1.10B | $342M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $114.70B | $153M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9.32B | $15M |
| Gross Margin | 62.9% | 45.4% |
| Operating Margin | 0.0% | 23.4% |
| Forward P/E | 14.9x | 6.9x |
| Total Debt | $200M | $290M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $56M | $63M |
GNK vs SHIP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
GNK
SHIP
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genco Shipping & Tr… (GNK) | 100 | 534.1 | +434.1% |
| Seanergy Maritime H… (SHIP) | 100 | 82.6 | -17.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GNK vs SHIP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SHIP leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Genco Shipping & Trading Limited is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GNK
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited
The Income Pick
GNK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 3.0%
- 401.1% 10Y total return vs SHIP's -99.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 22.3%, current ratio 2.34x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
The Growth Play
SHIP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth -5.6%, EPS growth -52.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.1%
- -5.6% revenue growth vs GNK's -19.1%
- Lower P/E (6.9x vs 14.9x)
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SHIP | -5.6% revenue growth vs GNK's -19.1% |
| Value | SHIP | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 14.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | SHIP | 9.7% margin vs GNK's 8.1% |
| Stability / Safety | GNK | Beta 1.00 vs SHIP's 1.21, lower leverage |
| Dividends | GNK | 3.0% yield, vs SHIP's 2.9% |
| Momentum (1Y) | SHIP | +207.0% vs GNK's +94.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GNK | 3.0% ROA vs SHIP's 2.5%, ROIC 0.7% vs 6.1% |
GNK vs SHIP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2021
GNK vs SHIP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLGNKLAGGINGSHIP
SHIPSeanergy Maritime Hol…
2leads
GNKGenco Shipping & Trad…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SHIPMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
GNK4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SHIP4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SHIP4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
GNK1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GNK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GNK is the larger business by revenue, generating $114.7B annually — 750.7x SHIP's $153M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 9.7% (SHIP) to 8.1% (GNK). On growth, GNK holds the edge at +1604.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | GNKGenco Shipping & … | SHIPSeanergy Maritime… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $114.7B | $153M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $112M | $68M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9.3B | $15M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $15.2B | -$6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.9% | +45.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.0% | +23.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +9.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.3% | -4.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1604.6% | +18.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +175.0% | +84.4% |
GNK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SHIP leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SHIP's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GNK's 14.4x.
| Metric | GNKGenco Shipping & … | SHIPSeanergy Maritime… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $342M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $570M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -252.10x | 16.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.93x | 6.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.38x | 7.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.21x | 2.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.22x | 1.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 20.11x |
SHIP leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — GNK and SHIP each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SHIP delivers a 5.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $4 for GNK. GNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHIP's 1.03x.
| Metric | GNKGenco Shipping & … | SHIPSeanergy Maritime… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.2% | +5.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.7% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.9% | +7.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 1.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $145M | $228M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $56M | $63M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $200M | $290M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.00x | 1.68x |
Evenly matched — GNK and SHIP each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SHIP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GNK five years ago would be worth $19,536 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,564 for SHIP. Over the past 12 months, SHIP leads with a +207.0% total return vs GNK's +94.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHIP at 56.3% vs GNK's 26.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | GNKGenco Shipping & … | SHIPSeanergy Maritime… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +39.4% | +79.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +94.4% | +207.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.0% | +282.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.4% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +401.1% | -99.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.6% | +56.3% |
SHIP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GNK and SHIP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GNK is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHIP's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | GNKGenco Shipping & … | SHIPSeanergy Maritime… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.09 | $16.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.66 | $5.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.6% | +96.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.0 | 62.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 415K | 258K |
Evenly matched — GNK and SHIP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
GNK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GNK as "Buy" and SHIP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.9% upside for SHIP (target: $17) vs -18.7% for GNK (target: $21). For income investors, GNK offers the higher dividend yield at 3.00% vs SHIP's 2.85%.
| Metric | GNKGenco Shipping & … | SHIPSeanergy Maritime… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.50 | $17.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.0% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.76 | $0.46 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GNK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
GNK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). SHIP leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallGenco Shipping & Trading Li… (GNK)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
GNK vs SHIP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GNK or SHIP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
(SHIP) is the stronger pick with -5. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 1% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (6. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GNK or SHIP?
On forward P/E, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
is actually cheaper at 6. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GNK or SHIP?
Over the past 5 years, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) delivered a total return of +95.
4%, compared to +65. 6% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GNK returned +401. 1% versus SHIP's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GNK or SHIP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
00β versus Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. 's 1. 21β — meaning SHIP is approximately 22% more volatile than GNK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 103% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GNK or SHIP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
(SHIP) is pulling ahead at -5. 6% versus -19. 1% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. grew EPS -52. 1% year-over-year, compared to -105. 7% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHIP leads at 8. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GNK or SHIP?
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
(SHIP) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 2% net margin versus -1. 3% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited — meaning it keeps 13. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHIP leads at 26. 0% versus 2. 7% for GNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHIP leads at 39. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GNK or SHIP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
(SHIP) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 14. 9x for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited — 8. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHIP: 4. 9% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GNK or SHIP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 2. 9% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP).
09Is GNK or SHIP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
00), 3. 0% yield, +401. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GNK: +401. 1%, SHIP: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GNK and SHIP?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GNK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SHIP is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(GNK: 160459.3% · SHIP: 18.6%)Net Margin>
%
(GNK: 8.1% · SHIP: 9.7%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.