Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GNTX vs MGA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
GNTX vs MGA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $5.07B | $17.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.53B | $42.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $385M | $829M |
| Gross Margin | 34.2% | 13.2% |
| Operating Margin | 18.8% | 6.0% |
| Forward P/E | 12.1x | 9.3x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $8.32B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $146M | $1.61B |
GNTX vs MGA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gentex Corporation (GNTX) | 100 | 89.1 | -10.9% |
| Magna International… (MGA) | 100 | 148.6 | +48.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GNTX vs MGA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GNTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 9.6%, EPS growth -1.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, current ratio 2.91x
- Beta 0.82, yield 2.1%, current ratio 2.91x
MGA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 1.08, yield 3.1%
- 91.9% 10Y total return vs GNTX's 74.8%
- PEG 2.66 vs GNTX's 2.81
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.6% revenue growth vs MGA's -0.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.3x vs 12.1x), PEG 2.66 vs 2.81 | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.2% margin vs MGA's 2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs MGA's 1.08 | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs GNTX's 2.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +94.7% vs GNTX's +11.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.4% ROA vs MGA's 2.6%, ROIC 15.9% vs 8.6% |
GNTX vs MGA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GNTX vs MGA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GNTX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGA is the larger business by revenue, generating $42.2B annually — 16.6x GNTX's $2.5B. GNTX is the more profitable business, keeping 15.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MGA's 2.0%. On growth, GNTX holds the edge at +19.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.5B | $42.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $545M | $4.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $385M | $829M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $458M | $2.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.2% | +13.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.8% | +6.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +5.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.0% | +3.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.2% | -100.5% |
Valuation Metrics
MGA leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, GNTX trades at a 35% valuation discount to MGA's 21.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GNTX offers better value at 3.15x vs MGA's 6.03x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.1B | $17.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.9B | $24.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.53x | 20.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.06x | 9.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.15x | 6.03x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.34x | 6.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.00x | 0.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.08x | 1.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.07x | 9.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GNTX leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GNTX delivers a 15.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $7 for MGA. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GNTX scores 6/9 vs MGA's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.5% | +6.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.4% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.9% | +8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.2% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.65x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$146M | $6.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $146M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $8.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 10.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MGA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MGA five years ago would be worth $7,492 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,283 for GNTX. Over the past 12 months, MGA leads with a +94.7% total return vs GNTX's +11.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MGA at 7.8% vs GNTX's -4.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.4% | +15.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.8% | +94.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.8% | +25.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.2% | -25.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +74.8% | +91.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.5% | +7.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GNTX and MGA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GNTX is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MGA's 1.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MGA currently trades 89.6% from its 52-week high vs GNTX's 80.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 1.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.38 | $69.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.48 | $32.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.2% | +89.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.3 | 51.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
MGA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GNTX as "Buy" and MGA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.4% upside for GNTX (target: $26) vs 4.6% for MGA (target: $66). For income investors, MGA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.13% vs GNTX's 2.07%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $26.00 | $65.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.49 | $1.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.2% | +0.8% |
MGA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). GNTX leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
GNTX vs MGA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GNTX or MGA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gentex Corporation (GNTX) is the stronger pick with 9.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for Magna International Inc. (MGA). Gentex Corporation (GNTX) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (12. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gentex Corporation (GNTX) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GNTX or MGA?
On trailing P/E, Gentex Corporation (GNTX) is the cheapest at 13.
5x versus Magna International Inc. at 21. 0x. On forward P/E, Magna International Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Magna International Inc. wins at 2. 66x versus Gentex Corporation's 2. 81x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GNTX or MGA?
Over the past 5 years, Magna International Inc.
(MGA) delivered a total return of -25. 1%, compared to -27. 2% for Gentex Corporation (GNTX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MGA returned +91. 9% versus GNTX's +74. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GNTX or MGA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gentex Corporation (GNTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
82β versus Magna International Inc. 's 1. 08β — meaning MGA is approximately 32% more volatile than GNTX relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — GNTX or MGA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gentex Corporation (GNTX) is pulling ahead at 9.
6% versus -0. 2% for Magna International Inc. (MGA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gentex Corporation grew EPS -1. 1% year-over-year, compared to -15. 1% for Magna International Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GNTX leads at 9. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GNTX or MGA?
Gentex Corporation (GNTX) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
2% net margin versus 2. 0% for Magna International Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GNTX leads at 19. 2% versus 5. 0% for MGA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GNTX leads at 34. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GNTX or MGA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Magna International Inc. (MGA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 66x versus Gentex Corporation's 2. 81x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Magna International Inc. (MGA) trades at 9. 3x forward P/E versus 12. 1x for Gentex Corporation — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GNTX: 10. 4% to $26. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GNTX or MGA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Magna International Inc. (MGA) offers the highest yield at 3. 1%, versus 2. 1% for Gentex Corporation (GNTX).
09Is GNTX or MGA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gentex Corporation (GNTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
82), 2. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GNTX: +74. 8%, MGA: +91. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GNTX and MGA?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GNTX is a small-cap deep-value stock; MGA is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.