Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GOGO vs NFLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
GOGO vs NFLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $632M | $374.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $907M | $45.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $10.98B |
| Gross Margin | 58.4% | 48.5% |
| Operating Margin | 12.2% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | 16.7x | 24.8x |
| Total Debt | $962M | $14.46B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $125M | $9.03B |
GOGO vs NFLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gogo Inc. (GOGO) | 100 | 224.5 | +124.5% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 210.3 | +110.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GOGO vs NFLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GOGO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 104.7%, EPS growth -5.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.1%
- 104.7% revenue growth vs NFLX's 15.9%
- Lower P/E (16.7x vs 24.8x)
NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.39
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs GOGO's -51.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 104.7% revenue growth vs NFLX's 15.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.7x vs 24.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs GOGO's 1.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs GOGO's 1.64, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -23.6% vs GOGO's -38.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs GOGO's 1.1%, ROIC 29.8% vs 9.1% |
GOGO vs NFLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GOGO vs NFLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 49.8x GOGO's $907M. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GOGO's 1.5%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $907M | $45.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $172M | $30.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $11.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.4% | +48.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +24.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +20.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.7% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.4% | +31.1% |
Valuation Metrics
GOGO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 34.9x trailing earnings, NFLX trades at a 29% valuation discount to GOGO's 49.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GOGO's 8.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NFLX's 12.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $632M | $374.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $379.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 49.37x | 34.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.68x | 24.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.42x | 12.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.69x | 8.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.31x | 14.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.70x | 39.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $13 for GOGO. NFLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GOGO's 9.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFLX scores 7/9 vs GOGO's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.0% | +41.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.1% | +29.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.0% | +30.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 9.51x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $836M | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $125M | $9.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $962M | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.39x | 17.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,519 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,185 for GOGO. Over the past 12 months, NFLX leads with a -23.6% total return vs GOGO's -38.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs GOGO's -27.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.9% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -38.0% | -23.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.9% | +166.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.2% | +75.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.8% | +875.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -27.5% | +38.6% |
Risk & Volatility
NFLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GOGO's 1.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NFLX currently trades 65.8% from its 52-week high vs GOGO's 27.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.64x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.82 | $134.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.85 | $75.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.8% | +65.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.9 | 35.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 44.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GOGO as "Hold" and NFLX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 71.3% upside for GOGO (target: $8) vs 31.8% for NFLX (target: $116).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $116.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 99 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% |
NFLX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GOGO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
GOGO vs NFLX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GOGO or NFLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gogo Inc.
(GOGO) is the stronger pick with 104. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 9% for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) offers the better valuation at 34. 9x trailing P/E (24. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GOGO or NFLX?
On trailing P/E, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the cheapest at 34. 9x versus Gogo Inc. at 49. 4x. On forward P/E, Gogo Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GOGO or NFLX?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) delivered a total return of +75. 2%, compared to -58. 2% for Gogo Inc. (GOGO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus GOGO's -51. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GOGO or NFLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Gogo Inc. 's 1. 64β — meaning GOGO is approximately 323% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 10% for Gogo Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GOGO or NFLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gogo Inc.
(GOGO) is pulling ahead at 104. 7% versus 15. 9% for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Netflix, Inc. grew EPS 27. 6% year-over-year, compared to -5. 4% for Gogo Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GOGO leads at 31. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GOGO or NFLX?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus 1. 4% for Gogo Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus 12. 5% for GOGO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOGO leads at 59. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GOGO or NFLX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Gogo Inc.
(GOGO) trades at 16. 7x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Netflix, Inc. — 8. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GOGO: 71. 3% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GOGO or NFLX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is GOGO or NFLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). Gogo Inc. (GOGO) carries a higher beta of 1. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, GOGO: -51. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GOGO and NFLX?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.