Leisure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GOLF vs FTDR vs DKS vs BLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Personal Products & Services
Specialty Retail
Engineering & Construction
GOLF vs FTDR vs DKS vs BLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Personal Products & Services | Specialty Retail | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $5.24B | $4.76B | $20.22B | $12.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.61B | $2.12B | $17.22B | $5.62B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $171M | $260M | $849M | $503M |
| Gross Margin | 47.5% | 54.3% | 32.9% | 28.8% |
| Operating Margin | 11.5% | 22.1% | 7.7% | 14.1% |
| Forward P/E | 24.1x | 15.2x | 15.6x | 23.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.07B | $1.21B | $4.49B | $3.15B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $50M | $566M | $1.69B | $185M |
GOLF vs FTDR vs DKS vs BLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acushnet Holdings C… (GOLF) | 100 | 267.9 | +167.9% |
| Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR) | 100 | 148.8 | +48.8% |
| DICK'S Sporting Goo… (DKS) | 100 | 616.4 | +516.4% |
| TopBuild Corp. (BLD) | 100 | 373.2 | +273.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GOLF vs FTDR vs DKS vs BLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GOLF lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
FTDR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 13.6%, EPS growth 13.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.0%
- PEG 0.72 vs DKS's 1.32
- Lower P/E (15.2x vs 23.5x), PEG 0.72 vs 1.19
- 12.3% margin vs DKS's 4.9%
DKS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 1.45, yield 2.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.45, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 1530.03x
- Beta 1.45, yield 2.2%, current ratio 1530.03x
- 28.1% revenue growth vs BLD's 1.5%
BLD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 12.2% 10Y total return vs DKS's 450.0%
- +50.2% vs DKS's +20.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.1% revenue growth vs BLD's 1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.2x vs 23.5x), PEG 0.72 vs 1.19 | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.3% margin vs DKS's 4.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.04 vs BLD's 1.47 | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs GOLF's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +50.2% vs DKS's +20.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.9% ROA vs DKS's 6.1%, ROIC 31.2% vs 0.0% |
GOLF vs FTDR vs DKS vs BLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GOLF vs FTDR vs DKS vs BLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FTDR leads in 5 of 6 categories
DKS leads 1 • GOLF leads 0 • BLD leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FTDR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DKS is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.2B annually — 8.1x FTDR's $2.1B. FTDR is the more profitable business, keeping 12.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DKS's 4.9%. On growth, DKS holds the edge at +59.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.6B | $2.1B | $17.2B | $5.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $342M | $554M | $1.4B | $981M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $171M | $260M | $849M | $503M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $89M | $385M | $399.7B | $704M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.5% | +54.3% | +32.9% | +28.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +22.1% | +7.7% | +14.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.5% | +12.3% | +4.9% | +9.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +18.2% | +23.2% | +12.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.1% | +5.9% | +59.9% | +17.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.0% | +18.8% | -61.0% | -11.8% |
Valuation Metrics
FTDR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.9x trailing earnings, FTDR trades at a 31% valuation discount to GOLF's 28.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FTDR offers better value at 0.94x vs DKS's 1.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.2B | $4.8B | $20.2B | $12.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.3B | $5.4B | $23.0B | $15.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.88x | 19.86x | 22.29x | 23.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.08x | 15.17x | 15.56x | 23.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.49x | 0.94x | 1.90x | 1.19x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.88x | 11.06x | 12.66x | 15.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.05x | 2.28x | 1.17x | 2.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.82x | 20.91x | 0.00x | 5.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 43.68x | 12.24x | 0.05x | 17.29x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FTDR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTDR delivers a 99.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $100 in annual profit, vs $0 for DKS. DKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FTDR's 5.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FTDR scores 8/9 vs BLD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.8% | +99.9% | +0.1% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.0% | +11.9% | +6.1% | +8.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.3% | +31.2% | +0.0% | +13.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.3% | +23.0% | +0.0% | +16.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.37x | 5.01x | 0.00x | 1.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.0B | $646M | $2.8B | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $50M | $566M | $1.7B | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $1.2B | $4.5B | $3.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.17x | 5.24x | 19.04x | 6.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FTDR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DKS five years ago would be worth $27,378 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,895 for FTDR. Over the past 12 months, BLD leads with a +50.2% total return vs DKS's +20.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FTDR at 30.9% vs DKS's 18.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.3% | +19.1% | +11.6% | -0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.3% | +28.1% | +20.6% | +50.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.8% | +124.4% | +67.2% | +99.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +81.1% | +29.0% | +173.8% | +91.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +434.4% | +126.4% | +450.0% | +1219.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.9% | +30.9% | +18.7% | +25.9% |
Risk & Volatility
FTDR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FTDR is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLD's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FTDR currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs BLD's 76.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.17x | 1.04x | 1.45x | 1.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $104.81 | $70.77 | $237.31 | $559.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $64.97 | $48.47 | $167.03 | $273.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.4% | +96.0% | +93.7% | +76.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 27.7 | 59.8 | 59.0 | 55.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 306K | 689K | 1.1M | 629K |
Analyst Outlook
DKS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GOLF as "Hold", FTDR as "Hold", DKS as "Buy", BLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.6% upside for BLD (target: $538) vs 2.1% for FTDR (target: $69). For income investors, DKS offers the higher dividend yield at 2.19% vs GOLF's 1.05%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $92.50 | $69.33 | $251.43 | $537.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 12 | 63 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | — | +2.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 10 | — | 11 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.94 | — | $4.86 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.0% | +5.9% | +1.7% | +3.6% |
FTDR leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). DKS leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook).
GOLF vs FTDR vs DKS vs BLD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GOLF or FTDR or DKS or BLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
(DKS) is the stronger pick with 28. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for TopBuild Corp. (BLD). Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR) offers the better valuation at 19. 9x trailing P/E (15. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. (DKS) a "Buy" — based on 63 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GOLF or FTDR or DKS or BLD?
On trailing P/E, Frontdoor, Inc.
(FTDR) is the cheapest at 19. 9x versus Acushnet Holdings Corp. at 28. 9x. On forward P/E, Frontdoor, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Frontdoor, Inc. wins at 0. 72x versus DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. 's 1. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GOLF or FTDR or DKS or BLD?
Over the past 5 years, DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
(DKS) delivered a total return of +173. 8%, compared to +29. 0% for Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLD returned +1219% versus FTDR's +126. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GOLF or FTDR or DKS or BLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Frontdoor, Inc.
(FTDR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 04β versus TopBuild Corp. 's 1. 47β — meaning BLD is approximately 41% more volatile than FTDR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. (DKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 5% for Frontdoor, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GOLF or FTDR or DKS or BLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
(DKS) is pulling ahead at 28. 1% versus 1. 5% for TopBuild Corp. (BLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Frontdoor, Inc. grew EPS 13. 6% year-over-year, compared to -29. 0% for DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKS leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GOLF or FTDR or DKS or BLD?
DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
(DKS) is the more profitable company, earning 49. 3% net margin versus 7. 4% for Acushnet Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 49. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FTDR leads at 19. 1% versus 7. 7% for DKS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FTDR leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GOLF or FTDR or DKS or BLD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 72x versus DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. 's 1. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR) trades at 15. 2x forward P/E versus 24. 1x for Acushnet Holdings Corp. — 8. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLD: 25. 6% to $537. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — GOLF or FTDR or DKS or BLD?
In this comparison, DKS (2.
2% yield), GOLF (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. FTDR, BLD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GOLF or FTDR or DKS or BLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Acushnet Holdings Corp.
(GOLF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 17), 1. 0% yield, +434. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOLF: +434. 4%, FTDR: +126. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GOLF and FTDR and DKS and BLD?
These companies operate in different sectors (GOLF (Consumer Cyclical) and FTDR (Consumer Cyclical) and DKS (Consumer Cyclical) and BLD (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GOLF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FTDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DKS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BLD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. GOLF, DKS pay a dividend while FTDR, BLD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.