Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
GOSS logo
GOSS
ARWR logo
ARWR
MNKD logo
MNKD
AVXL logo
AVXL
KALA logo
KALA
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GOSS vs ARWR vs MNKD vs AVXL vs KALA vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GOSS
Gossamer Bio, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$38M
5Y Perf.-98.8%
ARWR
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.50B
5Y Perf.+72.5%
MNKD
MannKind Corporation

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.13B
5Y Perf.+109.1%
AVXL
Anavex Life Sciences Corp.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$232M
5Y Perf.-49.2%
KALA
KALA BIO, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$58M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%

GOSS vs ARWR vs MNKD vs AVXL vs KALA vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GOSS logoGOSS
ARWR logoARWR
MNKD logoMNKD
AVXL logoAVXL
KALA logoKALA
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$38M$10.50B$1.13B$232M$58M$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$56M$622M$361M$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$-180M$-301M$-24M$-40M$-20M$57.05B
Gross Margin99.6%99.0%76.0%60.0%
Operating Margin-321.9%-35.7%3.7%25.9%
Forward P/E183.0x14.4x
Total Debt$202M$366M$473M$0.00$0.00$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$38M$227M$75M$103M$8M$343.34B

GOSS vs ARWR vs MNKD vs AVXL vs KALA vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GOSS
ARWR
MNKD
AVXL
KALA
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Gossamer Bio, Inc. (GOSS)1001.2-98.8%
Arrowhead Pharmaceu… (ARWR)100172.5+72.5%
MannKind Corporation (MNKD)100209.1+109.1%
Anavex Life Science… (AVXL)10050.8-49.2%
KALA BIO, Inc. (KALA)1000.0-100.0%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GOSS vs ARWR vs MNKD vs AVXL vs KALA vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 5 of 7 categories (6-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
GOSS
Gossamer Bio, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

GOSS plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ARWR
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Growth Play

ARWR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Rev growth 232.6%, EPS growth 99.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 50.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.69, Low D/E 72.8%, current ratio 4.86x
  • Beta 1.69, current ratio 4.86x
  • 232.6% revenue growth vs GOSS's -57.7%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
MNKD
MannKind Corporation
The Growth Angle

MNKD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
AVXL
Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 6 stocks, AVXL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
KALA
KALA BIO, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

KALA doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs ARWR's 11.7%
  • Better valuation composite
  • 20.4% margin vs GOSS's -324.8%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthARWR logoARWR232.6% revenue growth vs GOSS's -57.7%
ValueJPM logoJPMBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs GOSS's -324.8%
Stability / SafetyJPM logoJPMBeta 0.94 vs GOSS's 2.45
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ARWR logoARWR+359.4% vs KALA's -98.8%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPM1.3% ROA vs GOSS's -96.1%, ROIC 4.5% vs -107.5%

GOSS vs ARWR vs MNKD vs AVXL vs KALA vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GOSSGossamer Bio, Inc.
FY 2025
License and Service
0.0%$0
ARWRArrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MNKDMannKind Corporation
FY 2025
Product Revenue
62.0%$217M
Royalty
36.7%$128M
Service
1.2%$4M
AVXLAnavex Life Sciences Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

KALAKALA BIO, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

GOSS vs ARWR vs MNKD vs AVXL vs KALA vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGKALA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 5047.7x GOSS's $56M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GOSS's -3.2%. On growth, GOSS holds the edge at +71.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGOSS logoGOSSGossamer Bio, Inc.ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…AVXL logoAVXLAnavex Life Scien…KALA logoKALAKALA BIO, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$56M$622M$361M$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$178M-$197M$30M-$39M-$30M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$180M-$301M-$24M-$40M-$20M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$170M-$51M$13M-$34M-$26M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+99.6%+99.0%+76.0%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-3.2%-35.7%+3.7%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.2%-48.4%-6.6%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-3.1%-8.2%+3.5%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+71.5%-86.4%+15.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-25.0%-133.8%-2.3%+54.4%+85.8%+16.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 91% valuation discount to MNKD's 183.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, JPM's 18.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARWR's 87.0x.

MetricGOSS logoGOSSGossamer Bio, Inc.ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…AVXL logoAVXLAnavex Life Scien…KALA logoKALAKALA BIO, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$38M$10.5B$1.1B$232M$58M$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$202M$10.6B$1.5B$129M$50M$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.22x-6108.20x183.00x-4.63x-0.79x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple86.99x29.94x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.78x12.65x3.24x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share19.80x2.25x3.06x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF66.91x82.60x8.88x
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-13 for KALA. ARWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.73x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARWR scores 6/9 vs GOSS's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricGOSS logoGOSSGossamer Bio, Inc.ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…AVXL logoAVXLAnavex Life Scien…KALA logoKALAKALA BIO, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-55.1%-38.8%-13.4%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-96.1%-18.1%-3.9%-35.0%-94.9%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-107.5%+9.3%+21.6%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-86.1%+8.8%+8.3%-47.8%-172.0%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9064215
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.73x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$164M$140M$399M-$103M-$8M$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$38M$227M$75M$103M$8M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$202M$366M$473M$0$0$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-15.50x-2.03x0.29x-13.14x0.74x
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — ARWR and JPM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2 for KALA. Over the past 12 months, ARWR leads with a +359.4% total return vs KALA's -98.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs KALA's -84.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGOSS logoGOSSGossamer Bio, Inc.ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…AVXL logoAVXLAnavex Life Scien…KALA logoKALAKALA BIO, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-94.4%+9.9%-34.6%-32.1%-91.5%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-87.3%+359.4%-4.4%-69.6%-98.8%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-85.9%+110.6%-11.6%-71.1%-99.6%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.2%-15.7%-11.4%-88.1%-100.0%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.1%+1169.5%-28.9%-38.3%-100.0%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-48.0%+28.2%-4.0%-33.9%-84.8%+33.6%
Evenly matched — ARWR and JPM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GOSS's 2.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs KALA's 0.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGOSS logoGOSSGossamer Bio, Inc.ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…AVXL logoAVXLAnavex Life Scien…KALA logoKALAKALA BIO, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.45x1.69x1.10x1.77x2.13x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.87$82.00$6.51$13.99$1030.00$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.14$14.30$2.23$2.41$0.58$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+4.2%+90.9%+56.2%+17.9%+0.3%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10034.150.663.736.832.559.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded10.7M1.6M5.3M1.0M84K7.0M
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: GOSS as "Buy", ARWR as "Buy", MNKD as "Buy", AVXL as "Buy", KALA as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 593.9% upside for KALA (target: $18) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricGOSS logoGOSSGossamer Bio, Inc.ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…AVXL logoAVXLAnavex Life Scien…KALA logoKALAKALA BIO, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$0.77$84.00$8.50$11.00$18.25$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts17201913961
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0015
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+3.9%
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GOSS vs ARWR vs MNKD vs AVXL vs KALA vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GOSS or ARWR or MNKD or AVXL or KALA or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ARWR) is the stronger pick with 232. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -57. 7% for Gossamer Bio, Inc. (GOSS). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gossamer Bio, Inc. (GOSS) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GOSS or ARWR or MNKD or AVXL or KALA or JPM?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus MannKind Corporation at 183. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GOSS or ARWR or MNKD or AVXL or KALA or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -100. 0% for KALA BIO, Inc. (KALA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARWR returned +1170% versus KALA's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GOSS or ARWR or MNKD or AVXL or KALA or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Gossamer Bio, Inc. 's 2. 45β — meaning GOSS is approximately 159% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ARWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 73% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GOSS or ARWR or MNKD or AVXL or KALA or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ARWR) is pulling ahead at 232. 6% versus -57. 7% for Gossamer Bio, Inc. (GOSS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 99. 8% year-over-year, compared to -200. 0% for Gossamer Bio, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNKD leads at 51. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GOSS or ARWR or MNKD or AVXL or KALA or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -351. 5% for Gossamer Bio, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -336. 8% for GOSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARWR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GOSS or ARWR or MNKD or AVXL or KALA or JPM more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KALA: 593.

9% to $18. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GOSS or ARWR or MNKD or AVXL or KALA or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. GOSS, ARWR, MNKD, AVXL, KALA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is GOSS or ARWR or MNKD or AVXL or KALA or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). KALA BIO, Inc. (KALA) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, KALA: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GOSS and ARWR and MNKD and AVXL and KALA and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (GOSS (Healthcare) and ARWR (Healthcare) and MNKD (Healthcare) and AVXL (Healthcare) and KALA (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: GOSS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MNKD is a small-cap high-growth stock; AVXL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KALA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while GOSS, ARWR, MNKD, AVXL, KALA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.