Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
GOSS logo
GOSS
MNKD logo
MNKD
UTHR logo
UTHR
NKTR logo
NKTR
IQV logo
IQV
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GOSS vs MNKD vs UTHR vs NKTR vs IQV

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GOSS
Gossamer Bio, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$38M
5Y Perf.-98.8%
MNKD
MannKind Corporation

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.13B
5Y Perf.+109.1%
UTHR
United Therapeutics Corporation

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$23.17B
5Y Perf.+351.2%
NKTR
Nektar Therapeutics

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.16B
5Y Perf.-82.9%
IQV
IQVIA Holdings Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$30.79B
5Y Perf.+27.9%

GOSS vs MNKD vs UTHR vs NKTR vs IQV — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GOSS logoGOSS
MNKD logoMNKD
UTHR logoUTHR
NKTR logoNKTR
IQV logoIQV
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$38M$1.13B$23.17B$1.16B$30.79B
Revenue (TTM)$56M$361M$3.17B$56M$16.63B
Net Income (TTM)$-180M$-24M$1.29B$-158M$1.39B
Gross Margin99.6%76.0%86.6%99.4%26.1%
Operating Margin-321.9%3.7%45.3%-224.9%13.9%
Forward P/E183.0x19.2x14.2x
Total Debt$202M$473M$0.00$149M$16.17B
Cash & Equiv.$38M$75M$1.56B$15M$1.98B

GOSS vs MNKD vs UTHR vs NKTR vs IQVLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GOSS
MNKD
UTHR
NKTR
IQV
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Gossamer Bio, Inc. (GOSS)1001.2-98.8%
MannKind Corporation (MNKD)100209.1+109.1%
United Therapeutics… (UTHR)100451.2+351.2%
Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR)10017.1-82.9%
IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV)100127.9+27.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GOSS vs MNKD vs UTHR vs NKTR vs IQV

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: UTHR leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. MannKind Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. NKTR and IQV also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇UTHR emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
GOSS
Gossamer Bio, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, GOSS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
MNKD
MannKind Corporation
The Growth Leader

MNKD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.

  • 22.2% revenue growth vs GOSS's -57.7%
Best for: growth
UTHR
United Therapeutics Corporation
The Growth Play

UTHR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 10.6%, EPS growth 13.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.0%
  • 396.1% 10Y total return vs IQV's 177.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.14, current ratio 6.60x
  • Beta 0.14, current ratio 6.60x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
NKTR
Nektar Therapeutics
The Momentum Pick

NKTR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +5.8% vs GOSS's -87.3%
Best for: momentum
IQV
IQVIA Holdings Inc.
The Income Pick

IQV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.16
  • PEG 0.35 vs UTHR's 1.00
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMNKD logoMNKD22.2% revenue growth vs GOSS's -57.7%
ValueIQV logoIQVBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsUTHR logoUTHR40.6% margin vs GOSS's -324.8%
Stability / SafetyUTHR logoUTHRBeta 0.14 vs GOSS's 2.45
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NKTR logoNKTR+5.8% vs GOSS's -87.3%
Efficiency (ROA)UTHR logoUTHR17.2% ROA vs GOSS's -96.1%, ROIC 21.5% vs -107.5%

GOSS vs MNKD vs UTHR vs NKTR vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GOSSGossamer Bio, Inc.
FY 2025
License and Service
0.0%$0
MNKDMannKind Corporation
FY 2025
Product Revenue
62.0%$217M
Royalty
36.7%$128M
Service
1.2%$4M
UTHRUnited Therapeutics Corporation
FY 2025
Tyvaso
59.0%$1.9B
Remodulin
16.6%$527M
Orenitram
15.6%$497M
Unituxin
7.1%$227M
Adcirca
0.9%$30M
Product and Service, Other
0.8%$24M
NKTRNektar Therapeutics
FY 2025
Non Cash Royalty Revenue Related To Sale Of Future Royalties
99.5%$55M
License Collaboration And Other Revenue
0.5%$300,000
IQVIQVIA Holdings Inc.
FY 2025
Research And Development Solutions
54.5%$8.9B
Technology And Analytics Solutions
40.6%$6.6B
Contract Sales And Medical Solutions
4.8%$788M

GOSS vs MNKD vs UTHR vs NKTR vs IQV — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLUTHRLAGGINGMNKD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

UTHR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

IQV is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.6B annually — 299.5x GOSS's $56M. UTHR is the more profitable business, keeping 40.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GOSS's -3.2%. On growth, GOSS holds the edge at +71.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGOSS logoGOSSGossamer Bio, Inc.MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…UTHR logoUTHRUnited Therapeuti…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$56M$361M$3.2B$56M$16.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$178M$30M$1.5B-$124M$3.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$180M-$24M$1.3B-$158M$1.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$170M$13M$1.0B-$204M$2.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+99.6%+76.0%+86.6%+99.4%+26.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-3.2%+3.7%+45.3%-2.2%+13.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.2%-6.6%+40.6%-2.8%+8.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-3.1%+3.5%+32.1%-3.7%+16.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+71.5%+15.1%-1.6%+3.8%+8.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-25.0%-2.3%-12.2%+49.7%+15.0%
UTHR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

IQV leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 19.6x trailing earnings, UTHR trades at a 89% valuation discount to MNKD's 183.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IQV offers better value at 0.57x vs UTHR's 1.02x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricGOSS logoGOSSGossamer Bio, Inc.MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…UTHR logoUTHRUnited Therapeuti…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
Market CapShares × price$38M$1.1B$23.2B$1.2B$30.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$202M$1.5B$21.6B$1.3B$45.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.22x183.00x19.60x-6.10x23.15x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.19.21x14.16x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.02x0.57x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple29.94x13.49x13.11x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.78x3.24x7.28x21.01x1.89x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.69x11.15x4.75x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF82.60x22.27x15.01x
IQV leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

UTHR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

IQV delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-87 for NKTR. NKTR carries lower financial leverage with a 1.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UTHR scores 7/9 vs GOSS's 0/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricGOSS logoGOSSGossamer Bio, Inc.MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…UTHR logoUTHRUnited Therapeuti…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+19.2%-87.0%+22.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-96.1%-3.9%+17.2%-40.7%+4.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-107.5%+21.6%+21.5%-57.2%+8.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-86.1%+8.3%+21.8%-55.7%+11.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–904724
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.66x2.44x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$164M$399M-$1.6B$134M$14.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$38M$75M$1.6B$15M$2.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$202M$473M$0$149M$16.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-15.50x0.29x99.37x-4.15x3.10x
UTHR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in UTHR five years ago would be worth $30,390 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $184 for GOSS. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +577.9% total return vs GOSS's -87.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 90.8% vs GOSS's -48.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGOSS logoGOSSGossamer Bio, Inc.MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…UTHR logoUTHRUnited Therapeuti…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-94.4%-34.6%+9.9%+36.8%-19.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-87.3%-4.4%+90.8%+577.9%+14.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-85.9%-11.6%+139.6%+594.5%-14.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.2%-11.4%+203.9%-77.6%-25.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.1%-28.9%+396.1%-73.6%+177.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-48.0%-4.0%+33.8%+90.8%-5.0%
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

UTHR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

UTHR is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GOSS's 2.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UTHR currently trades 89.6% from its 52-week high vs GOSS's 4.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGOSS logoGOSSGossamer Bio, Inc.MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…UTHR logoUTHRUnited Therapeuti…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.45x1.10x0.14x1.50x1.16x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.87$6.51$609.35$109.00$247.05
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.14$2.23$272.12$7.99$153.01
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+4.2%+56.2%+89.6%+54.5%+73.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10034.163.742.232.154.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded10.7M5.3M400K994K1.5M
UTHR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: GOSS as "Buy", MNKD as "Buy", UTHR as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 373.6% upside for GOSS (target: $1) vs 16.6% for UTHR (target: $637).

MetricGOSS logoGOSSGossamer Bio, Inc.MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…UTHR logoUTHRUnited Therapeuti…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$0.77$8.50$636.83$149.60$222.22
# AnalystsCovering analysts1719303344
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises12
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+4.3%0.0%+4.0%
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

UTHR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IQV leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).

Best OverallUnited Therapeutics Corpora… (UTHR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GOSS vs MNKD vs UTHR vs NKTR vs IQV: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GOSS or MNKD or UTHR or NKTR or IQV a better buy right now?

For growth investors, MannKind Corporation (MNKD) is the stronger pick with 22.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -57. 7% for Gossamer Bio, Inc. (GOSS). United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) offers the better valuation at 19. 6x trailing P/E (19. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gossamer Bio, Inc. (GOSS) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GOSS or MNKD or UTHR or NKTR or IQV?

On trailing P/E, United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) is the cheapest at 19.

6x versus MannKind Corporation at 183. 0x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IQVIA Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 35x versus United Therapeutics Corporation's 1. 00x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GOSS or MNKD or UTHR or NKTR or IQV?

Over the past 5 years, United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) delivered a total return of +203.

9%, compared to -98. 2% for Gossamer Bio, Inc. (GOSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UTHR returned +396. 1% versus GOSS's -99. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GOSS or MNKD or UTHR or NKTR or IQV?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

14β versus Gossamer Bio, Inc. 's 2. 45β — meaning GOSS is approximately 1707% more volatile than UTHR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 166% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GOSS or MNKD or UTHR or NKTR or IQV?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MannKind Corporation (MNKD) is pulling ahead at 22.

2% versus -57. 7% for Gossamer Bio, Inc. (GOSS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: United Therapeutics Corporation grew EPS 13. 1% year-over-year, compared to -200. 0% for Gossamer Bio, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNKD leads at 51. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GOSS or MNKD or UTHR or NKTR or IQV?

United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) is the more profitable company, earning 41.

9% net margin versus -351. 5% for Gossamer Bio, Inc. — meaning it keeps 41. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UTHR leads at 47. 7% versus -336. 8% for GOSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GOSS or MNKD or UTHR or NKTR or IQV more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus United Therapeutics Corporation's 1. 00x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 19. 2x for United Therapeutics Corporation — 5. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GOSS: 373. 6% to $0. 77.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GOSS or MNKD or UTHR or NKTR or IQV?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is GOSS or MNKD or UTHR or NKTR or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

14), +396. 1% 10Y return). Gossamer Bio, Inc. (GOSS) carries a higher beta of 2. 45 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UTHR: +396. 1%, GOSS: -99. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GOSS and MNKD and UTHR and NKTR and IQV?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GOSS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNKD is a small-cap high-growth stock; UTHR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.