Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GPUS vs BTBT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GPUS
Hyperscale Data, Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$129K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$589M
5Y Perf.+91.6%

GPUS vs BTBT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GPUS logoGPUS
BTBT logoBTBT
IndustryAerospace & DefenseFinancial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$129K$589M
Revenue (TTM)$95M$164M
Net Income (TTM)$-37M$137M
Gross Margin20.0%61.9%
Operating Margin-41.9%16.8%
Forward P/E9.2x
Total Debt$120M$14M
Cash & Equiv.$5M$95M

GPUS vs BTBTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GPUS
BTBT
StockMay 20May 26Return
Hyperscale Data, In… (GPUS)1000.0-100.0%
Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)100191.6+91.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GPUS vs BTBT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BTBT leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Hyperscale Data, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
GPUS
Hyperscale Data, Inc.
The Income Pick

GPUS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.34, yield 100.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.34, current ratio 0.27x
  • Beta 2.34, yield 100.0%, current ratio 0.27x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
  • -60.4% 10Y total return vs GPUS's -100.0%
  • 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs GPUS's -31.8%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBTBT logoBTBT264.6% NII/revenue growth vs GPUS's -31.8%
Quality / MarginsBTBT logoBTBT17.3% margin vs GPUS's -38.8%
Stability / SafetyGPUS logoGPUSBeta 2.34 vs BTBT's 3.37
DividendsGPUS logoGPUS100.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs BTBT's 0.3%
Momentum (1Y)BTBT logoBTBT-9.0% vs GPUS's -98.1%
Efficiency (ROA)BTBT logoBTBT19.0% ROA vs GPUS's -15.1%, ROIC 6.5% vs -36.9%

GPUS vs BTBT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GPUSHyperscale Data, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

BTBTBit Digital, Inc.
FY 2024
Other Member
100.0%$550,260

GPUS vs BTBT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBTBTLAGGINGGPUS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

BTBT is the larger business by revenue, generating $164M annually — 1.7x GPUS's $95M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GPUS's -38.8%.

MetricGPUS logoGPUSHyperscale Data, …BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$95M$164M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$18M$166M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$37M$137M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$40M-$448M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+20.0%+61.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-41.9%+16.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-38.8%+17.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-42.1%-65.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-21.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+98.4%+2.8%
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

GPUS leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricGPUS logoGPUSHyperscale Data, …BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$128,863$589M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$116M$508M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.00x9.15x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.49x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.00x3.60x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.06x0.56x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
GPUS leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BTBT leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-64 for GPUS. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GPUS's 57.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs GPUS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricGPUS logoGPUSHyperscale Data, …BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-63.6%+21.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-15.1%+19.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-36.9%+6.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-114.4%+8.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–936
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage57.56x0.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$116M-$81M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$5M$95M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$120M$14M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.75x
BTBT leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BTBT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BTBT five years ago would be worth $1,543 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for GPUS. Over the past 12 months, BTBT leads with a -9.0% total return vs GPUS's -98.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BTBT at -7.1% vs GPUS's -98.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGPUS logoGPUSHyperscale Data, …BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-55.9%-10.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-98.1%-9.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-19.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-84.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-60.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-98.0%-7.1%
BTBT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — GPUS and BTBT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

GPUS is the less volatile stock with a 2.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BTBT currently trades 40.2% from its 52-week high vs GPUS's 1.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGPUS logoGPUSHyperscale Data, …BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.34x3.37x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$9.98$4.55
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.12$1.25
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+1.2%+40.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10040.969.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded27.9M18.5M
Evenly matched — GPUS and BTBT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

GPUS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

For income investors, GPUS offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs BTBT's 0.31%.

MetricGPUS logoGPUSHyperscale Data, …BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+100.0%+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises30
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$4.87$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
GPUS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

BTBT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GPUS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallBit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GPUS vs BTBT: Frequently Asked Questions

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GPUS or BTBT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -31. 8% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — GPUS or BTBT?

Over the past 5 years, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) delivered a total return of -84. 6%, compared to -100. 0% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BTBT returned -60. 4% versus GPUS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — GPUS or BTBT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hyperscale Data, Inc.

(GPUS) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 34β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately 44% more volatile than GPUS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 58% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — GPUS or BTBT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -31. 8% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to 76. 2% for Hyperscale Data, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — GPUS or BTBT?

Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -52. 7% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -53. 4% for GPUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — GPUS or BTBT?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 0. 3% for Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT).

07

Is GPUS or BTBT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hyperscale Data, Inc.

(GPUS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (100. 0% yield). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GPUS: -100. 0%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between GPUS and BTBT?

These companies operate in different sectors (GPUS (Industrials) and BTBT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: GPUS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock. GPUS pays a dividend while BTBT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

GPUS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $20B
  • Gross Margin > 12%
  • Dividend Yield > 40.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BTBT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 132%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GPUS and BTBT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GPUS: -21.7% · BTBT: 264.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.