Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GPUS vs SPIR vs ASTS vs APLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Communication Equipment
Information Technology Services
GPUS vs SPIR vs ASTS vs APLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Specialty Business Services | Communication Equipment | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $129K | $529.86B | $19.12B | $11.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $95M | $72M | $71M | $282M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-37M | $-25.02B | $-342M | $-123M |
| Gross Margin | 20.0% | 40.8% | 53.4% | 16.4% |
| Operating Margin | -41.9% | -121.4% | -405.7% | -31.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.0x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $120M | $8.76B | $32M | $703M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $24.81B | $2.34B | $114M |
GPUS vs SPIR vs ASTS vs APLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyperscale Data, In… (GPUS) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 121.4 | +21.4% |
| AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS) | 100 | 867.8 | +767.8% |
| Applied Digital Cor… (APLD) | 100 | 1236.0 | +1136.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GPUS vs SPIR vs ASTS vs APLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GPUS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.34, yield 100.0%
- Beta 2.34, yield 100.0%, current ratio 0.27x
- -38.8% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
- Beta 2.34 vs APLD's 3.23
SPIR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ASTS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.82, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 16.35x
- 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
APLD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 7.6% 10Y total return vs ASTS's 5.7%
- +6.9% vs GPUS's -98.1%
- -2.3% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC -7.3% vs -0.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | -38.8% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.34 vs APLD's 3.23 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs APLD's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.9% vs GPUS's -98.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -2.3% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC -7.3% vs -0.1% |
GPUS vs SPIR vs ASTS vs APLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
GPUS vs SPIR vs ASTS vs APLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GPUS leads in 3 of 6 categories
SPIR leads 1 • APLD leads 1 • ASTS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GPUS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APLD is the larger business by revenue, generating $282M annually — 4.0x ASTS's $71M. GPUS is the more profitable business, keeping -38.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $95M | $72M | $71M | $282M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$18M | -$74M | -$237M | -$53M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$37M | -$25.0B | -$342M | -$123M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$40M | -$16.2B | -$1.1B | -$1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.0% | +40.8% | +53.4% | +16.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -41.9% | -121.4% | -4.1% | -31.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -38.8% | -349.6% | -4.8% | -43.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -42.1% | -227.0% | -16.0% | -4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -21.7% | -26.9% | +27.3% | +98.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +98.4% | +59.5% | -55.6% | +89.4% |
Valuation Metrics
GPUS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $128,863 | $529.9B | $19.1B | $11.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $116M | $513.8B | $16.8B | $12.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | 10.01x | -48.76x | -35.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 1099.67x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 7405.21x | 269.64x | 55.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.06x | 4.56x | 5.68x | 13.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPIR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
APLD delivers a -6.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. ASTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GPUS's 57.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPIR scores 5/9 vs APLD's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -63.6% | -88.4% | -21.1% | -6.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.1% | -47.3% | -12.6% | -2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -36.9% | -0.1% | -47.1% | -7.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -114.4% | -0.1% | -10.0% | -9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 57.56x | 0.08x | 0.01x | 1.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $116M | -$16.1B | -$2.3B | $589M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $24.8B | $2.3B | $114M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $120M | $8.8B | $32M | $703M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.75x | 9.20x | -21.20x | -2.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
APLD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APLD five years ago would be worth $85,629 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for GPUS. Over the past 12 months, APLD leads with a +691.0% total return vs GPUS's -98.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 134.8% vs GPUS's -98.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -55.9% | +106.4% | -21.7% | +47.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -98.1% | +73.1% | +158.1% | +691.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +198.1% | +1194.0% | +1125.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -79.6% | +688.2% | +756.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -78.8% | +568.8% | +756.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -98.0% | +43.9% | +134.8% | +130.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GPUS and APLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GPUS is the less volatile stock with a 2.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than APLD's 3.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. APLD currently trades 93.9% from its 52-week high vs GPUS's 1.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.34x | 2.93x | 2.82x | 3.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.98 | $23.59 | $129.89 | $44.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.12 | $6.60 | $22.47 | $5.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.2% | +68.3% | +50.3% | +93.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.9 | 55.5 | 41.8 | 74.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 27.9M | 1.6M | 14.9M | 20.3M |
Analyst Outlook
GPUS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPIR as "Buy", ASTS as "Buy", APLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.6% upside for ASTS (target: $104) vs 7.0% for SPIR (target: $17). GPUS is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.25 | $103.65 | $61.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 7 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | — | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.87 | — | — | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
GPUS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SPIR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
GPUS vs SPIR vs ASTS vs APLD: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GPUS or SPIR or ASTS or APLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GPUS or SPIR or ASTS or APLD?
Over the past 5 years, Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) delivered a total return of +756.
3%, compared to -100. 0% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APLD returned +756. 3% versus GPUS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GPUS or SPIR or ASTS or APLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hyperscale Data, Inc.
(GPUS) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 34β versus Applied Digital Corporation's 3. 23β — meaning APLD is approximately 38% more volatile than GPUS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 58% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GPUS or SPIR or ASTS or APLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to 11. 5% for Applied Digital Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, APLD leads at 193. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GPUS or SPIR or ASTS or APLD?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -482. 2% for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APLD leads at -33. 5% versus -405. 7% for ASTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASTS leads at 53. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GPUS or SPIR or ASTS or APLD?
In this comparison, GPUS (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. SPIR, ASTS, APLD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is GPUS or SPIR or ASTS or APLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+756.
3% 10Y return). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (APLD: +756. 3%, SPIR: -78. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GPUS and SPIR and ASTS and APLD?
These companies operate in different sectors (GPUS (Industrials) and SPIR (Industrials) and ASTS (Technology) and APLD (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GPUS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; APLD is a mid-cap high-growth stock. GPUS pays a dividend while SPIR, ASTS, APLD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.