Residential Construction
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GRBK vs DHI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Residential Construction
GRBK vs DHI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Residential Construction | Residential Construction |
| Market Cap | $2.83B | $42.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.10B | $33.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $313M | $3.17B |
| Gross Margin | 30.5% | 22.8% |
| Operating Margin | 19.5% | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | 13.7x |
| Total Debt | $335M | $6.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $191M | $2.99B |
GRBK vs DHI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Green Brick Partner… (GRBK) | 100 | 613.8 | +513.8% |
| D.R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) | 100 | 264.0 | +164.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GRBK vs DHI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GRBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -0.0%, EPS growth -16.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
- 7.4% 10Y total return vs DHI's 424.3%
- PEG 0.42 vs DHI's 1.09
DHI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.85, yield 1.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.85, Low D/E 24.4%, current ratio 17.39x
- Beta 0.85, yield 1.1%, current ratio 17.39x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -0.0% revenue growth vs DHI's -6.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 13.7x), PEG 0.42 vs 1.09 | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.9% margin vs DHI's 9.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.85 vs GRBK's 1.06 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs GRBK's 0.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.3% vs GRBK's +10.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.0% ROA vs DHI's 8.9%, ROIC 15.4% vs 12.1% |
GRBK vs DHI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GRBK vs DHI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GRBK and DHI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DHI is the larger business by revenue, generating $33.3B annually — 15.9x GRBK's $2.1B. GRBK is the more profitable business, keeping 14.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DHI's 9.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $33.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $415M | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $313M | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $208M | $3.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.5% | +22.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.5% | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +9.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +10.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | -2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -22.9% | -13.2% |
Valuation Metrics
GRBK leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.3x trailing earnings, GRBK trades at a 26% valuation discount to DHI's 12.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GRBK offers better value at 0.36x vs DHI's 1.01x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $42.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.0B | $45.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.29x | 12.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.98x | 13.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.36x | 1.01x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.19x | 10.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.35x | 1.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.49x | 1.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.60x | 12.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GRBK leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GRBK delivers a 17.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $13 for DHI. GRBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DHI's 0.24x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.0% | +12.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.0% | +8.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.4% | +12.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.1% | +13.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $144M | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $191M | $3.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $335M | $6.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 44.09x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — GRBK and DHI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GRBK five years ago would be worth $25,408 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,674 for DHI. Over the past 12 months, DHI leads with a +20.3% total return vs GRBK's +10.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DHI at 11.5% vs GRBK's 9.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.9% | +0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.5% | +20.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.2% | +38.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +154.1% | +46.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +742.1% | +424.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.5% | +11.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GRBK and DHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DHI is the less volatile stock with a 0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GRBK's 1.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.06x | 0.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $80.97 | $184.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $56.85 | $114.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.1% | +79.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.0 | 49.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 200K | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
DHI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GRBK as "Hold" and DHI as "Hold". DHI is the only dividend payer here at 1.09% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $163.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.07 | $1.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | +10.1% |
GRBK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). DHI leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.
GRBK vs DHI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GRBK or DHI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Green Brick Partners, Inc.
(GRBK) is the stronger pick with -0. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 9% for D. R. Horton, Inc. (DHI). Green Brick Partners, Inc. (GRBK) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (11. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Green Brick Partners, Inc. (GRBK) a "Hold" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GRBK or DHI?
On trailing P/E, Green Brick Partners, Inc.
(GRBK) is the cheapest at 9. 3x versus D. R. Horton, Inc. at 12. 6x. On forward P/E, Green Brick Partners, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Green Brick Partners, Inc. wins at 0. 42x versus D. R. Horton, Inc. 's 1. 09x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GRBK or DHI?
Over the past 5 years, Green Brick Partners, Inc.
(GRBK) delivered a total return of +154. 1%, compared to +46. 7% for D. R. Horton, Inc. (DHI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GRBK returned +742. 1% versus DHI's +424. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GRBK or DHI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), D.
R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 85β versus Green Brick Partners, Inc. 's 1. 06β — meaning GRBK is approximately 25% more volatile than DHI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Green Brick Partners, Inc. (GRBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 24% for D. R. Horton, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GRBK or DHI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Green Brick Partners, Inc.
(GRBK) is pulling ahead at -0. 0% versus -6. 9% for D. R. Horton, Inc. (DHI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Green Brick Partners, Inc. grew EPS -16. 3% year-over-year, compared to -19. 3% for D. R. Horton, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GRBK leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GRBK or DHI?
Green Brick Partners, Inc.
(GRBK) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 9% net margin versus 10. 5% for D. R. Horton, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GRBK leads at 19. 5% versus 12. 9% for DHI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GRBK leads at 30. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GRBK or DHI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Green Brick Partners, Inc. (GRBK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 42x versus D. R. Horton, Inc. 's 1. 09x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Green Brick Partners, Inc. (GRBK) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 13. 7x for D. R. Horton, Inc. — 2. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — GRBK or DHI?
In this comparison, DHI (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. GRBK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GRBK or DHI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, D.
R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 85), 1. 1% yield, +424. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DHI: +424. 3%, GRBK: +742. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GRBK and DHI?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
DHI pays a dividend while GRBK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.