GRC vs FELE vs GTLS vs NDSN

For growth investors, Franklin Electric Co.

, Inc. (FELE) is the stronger pick with 5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 5% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS). Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. (FELE) offers the better valuation at 30. 8x trailing P/E (21. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Franklin Electric Co.

, Inc. (FELE) is the cheapest at 30. 8x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 628. 5x. On forward P/E, Chart Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Nordson Corporation wins at 1. 68x versus Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. 's 2. 50x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC) delivered a total return of +122.

6%, compared to +20. 3% for Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. (FELE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTLS returned +772. 5% versus GRC's +209. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chart Industries, Inc.

(GTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus The Gorman-Rupp Company's 1. 24β — meaning GRC is approximately 122% more volatile than GTLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. (FELE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 111% for Chart Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Franklin Electric Co.

, Inc. (FELE) is pulling ahead at 5. 4% versus 2. 5% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Gorman-Rupp Company grew EPS 32. 0% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Nordson Corporation (NDSN) is the more profitable company, earning 17.

4% net margin versus 1. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NDSN leads at 25. 5% versus 12. 7% for FELE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NDSN leads at 55. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Nordson Corporation (NDSN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 68x versus Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. 's 2. 50x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 29. 6x for The Gorman-Rupp Company — 13. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NDSN: 9. 6% to $311. 50.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Nordson Corporation (NDSN) offers the highest yield at 1. 1%, versus 0. 3% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Chart Industries, Inc.

(GTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +772. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTLS: +772. 5%, GRC: +209. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

GRC, FELE, NDSN pay a dividend while GTLS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.