Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GRCE vs RARE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
GRCE vs RARE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $35M | $2.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $669M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $-609M |
| Gross Margin | — | 83.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | -83.9% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $22M | $434M |
GRCE vs RARE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grace Therapeutics,… (GRCE) | 100 | 70.3 | -29.7% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 51.2 | -48.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GRCE vs RARE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GRCE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.87
- EPS growth 54.3%
- -25.2% 10Y total return vs RARE's -59.4%
RARE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- -21.8% vs GRCE's -25.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 55.3% revenue growth vs RARE's 20.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.0% margin vs RARE's -91.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs RARE's 1.42 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -21.8% vs GRCE's -25.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -8.7% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC -30.1% vs -89.4% |
GRCE vs RARE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GRCE vs RARE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GRCE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RARE and GRCE operate at a comparable scale, with $669M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $669M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | -$536M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | -$609M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | -$487M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +83.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -83.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -91.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -72.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +61.1% | -17.2% |
Valuation Metrics
RARE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $35M | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13M | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.85x | -4.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.41x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GRCE leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GRCE delivers a -9.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-9 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RARE scores 4/9 vs GRCE's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.2% | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.7% | -45.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -30.1% | -89.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -23.5% | -46.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$22M | $842M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $22M | $434M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -14.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GRCE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GRCE five years ago would be worth $7,475 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,281 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, RARE leads with a -21.8% total return vs GRCE's -25.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GRCE at -9.2% vs RARE's -17.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -38.5% | +10.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.5% | -21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.2% | -44.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.2% | -77.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.2% | -59.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.2% | -17.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GRCE and RARE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GRCE is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RARE's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RARE currently trades 61.7% from its 52-week high vs GRCE's 43.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 1.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.18 | $42.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.79 | $18.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.4% | +61.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.1 | 66.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 886K | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $51.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GRCE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RARE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
GRCE vs RARE: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GRCE or RARE a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
(RARE) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GRCE or RARE?
Over the past 5 years, Grace Therapeutics, Inc.
(GRCE) delivered a total return of -25. 2%, compared to -77. 2% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GRCE returned -25. 2% versus RARE's -59. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GRCE or RARE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Grace Therapeutics, Inc.
(GRCE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. 's 1. 42β — meaning RARE is approximately 64% more volatile than GRCE relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — GRCE or RARE?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Grace Therapeutics, Inc.
grew EPS 54. 3% year-over-year, compared to 7. 3% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GRCE or RARE?
Grace Therapeutics, Inc.
(GRCE) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -85. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GRCE leads at 0. 0% versus -79. 5% for RARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RARE leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GRCE or RARE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is GRCE or RARE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Grace Therapeutics, Inc.
(GRCE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GRCE: -25. 2%, RARE: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GRCE and RARE?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GRCE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.