Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GREE vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs CIFR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GREE
Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$19M
5Y Perf.-98.9%
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.83B
5Y Perf.+488.0%
RIOT
Riot Platforms, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.14B
5Y Perf.+637.3%
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.58B
5Y Perf.+85.2%
CIFR
Cipher Mining Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$8.40B
5Y Perf.+110.0%

GREE vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs CIFR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GREE logoGREE
MARA logoMARA
RIOT logoRIOT
CLSK logoCLSK
CIFR logoCIFR
IndustryFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital MarketsSoftware - ApplicationFinancial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$19M$4.83B$9.14B$3.58B$8.40B
Revenue (TTM)$60M$907M$647M$785M$224M
Net Income (TTM)$-2M$-1.31B$-867M$-261M$-898M
Gross Margin79.7%-47.7%-15.6%41.4%28.4%
Operating Margin-19.2%-90.6%-61.8%-26.4%-150.7%
Forward P/E12.5x
Total Debt$68M$3.65B$280M$824M$2.77B
Cash & Equiv.$9M$547M$234M$43M$628M

GREE vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs CIFRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GREE
MARA
RIOT
CLSK
CIFR
StockOct 20May 26Return
Greenidge Generatio… (GREE)1001.1-98.9%
Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA)100588.0+488.0%
Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT)100737.3+637.3%
CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK)100185.2+85.2%
Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR)100210.0+110.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GREE vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs CIFR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GREE and MARA are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. CLSK and CIFR also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
GREE
Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc.
The Banking Pick

GREE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.

  • -33.2% margin vs CIFR's -367.2%
  • -3.2% ROA vs CIFR's -24.7%, ROIC -57.2% vs -11.7%
Best for: quality and efficiency
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MARA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and stability is your priority.

  • Better valuation composite
  • Beta 3.11 vs CIFR's 3.87, lower leverage
Best for: value and stability
RIOT
Riot Platforms, Inc.
The Banking Pick

RIOT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 3.87
Best for: income & stability
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
The Growth Play

CLSK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 102.2%, EPS growth 262.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 79.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 3.39, Low D/E 37.9%, current ratio 4.18x
  • Beta 3.39, yield 0.2%, current ratio 4.18x
  • 102.2% revenue growth vs GREE's -15.4%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
CIFR
Cipher Mining Inc.
The Banking Pick

CIFR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 108.9% 10Y total return vs RIOT's 7.9%
  • +5.8% vs MARA's -4.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCLSK logoCLSK102.2% revenue growth vs GREE's -15.4%
ValueMARA logoMARABetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsGREE logoGREE-33.2% margin vs CIFR's -367.2%
Stability / SafetyMARA logoMARABeta 3.11 vs CIFR's 3.87, lower leverage
DividendsCLSK logoCLSK0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CIFR logoCIFR+5.8% vs MARA's -4.7%
Efficiency (ROA)GREE logoGREE-3.2% ROA vs CIFR's -24.7%, ROIC -57.2% vs -11.7%

GREE vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs CIFR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GREEGreenidge Generation Holdings Inc.
FY 2024
Cryptocurrency Mining
64.2%$19M
Power And Capacity
35.8%$11M
MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Hosting Services
100.0%$5M
RIOTRiot Platforms, Inc.
FY 2025
Bitcoin Mining Segment
85.9%$576M
Engineering Segment
14.1%$94M
CLSKCleanSpark, Inc.
FY 2021
Consolidated Revenues
96.9%$49M
Other Revenue And Eliminations
3.1%$2M
CIFRCipher Mining Inc.
FY 2025
Bitcoin Mining
100.0%$224M

GREE vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs CIFR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLGREELAGGINGRIOT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

GREE leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $907M annually — 15.2x GREE's $60M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -33.2% (GREE) to -3.7% (CIFR).

MetricGREE logoGREEGreenidge Generat…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$60M$907M$647M$785M$224M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$4M$627M-$450M$181M-$203M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$2M-$1.3B-$867M-$261M-$898M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$20M-$312M-$1.0B-$1.0B-$930M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+79.7%-47.7%-15.6%+41.4%+28.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-19.2%-90.6%-61.8%-26.4%-150.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-33.2%-144.6%-102.4%-33.2%-3.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-37.7%-34.4%-119.6%-133.1%-3.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.3%-4.8%-60.0%-2.6%-154.5%
GREE leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — GREE and MARA and RIOT and CLSK each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, CLSK's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GREE's 38.9x.

MetricGREE logoGREEGreenidge Generat…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.
Market CapShares × price$19M$4.8B$9.1B$3.6B$8.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$79M$7.9B$9.2B$4.4B$10.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.65x-3.44x-12.36x12.48x-9.62x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple38.86x6.53x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.32x5.32x14.12x4.67x37.49x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.30x2.87x2.04x9.44x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
Evenly matched — GREE and MARA and RIOT and CLSK each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CLSK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

CLSK delivers a -13.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-14 in annual profit, vs $-116 for CIFR. RIOT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CIFR's 3.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLSK scores 5/9 vs CIFR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricGREE logoGREEGreenidge Generat…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-30.5%-28.8%-13.7%-115.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-3.2%-17.1%-21.5%-8.5%-24.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-57.2%-9.0%-8.7%+10.3%-11.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-23.9%-12.1%-11.0%+13.7%-15.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–933353
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.05x0.10x0.38x3.31x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$59M$3.1B$46M$781M$2.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$9M$547M$234M$43M$628M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$68M$3.6B$280M$824M$2.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.70x4.73x-16.47x-18.49x-32.12x
CLSK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CIFR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CIFR five years ago would be worth $20,789 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $82 for GREE. Over the past 12 months, CIFR leads with a +584.9% total return vs MARA's -4.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CIFR at 119.7% vs GREE's -33.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGREE logoGREEGreenidge Generat…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-25.6%+28.2%+70.3%+21.0%+27.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+29.0%-4.7%+207.5%+74.1%+584.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-71.0%+36.1%+129.8%+229.7%+960.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.2%-59.5%-27.8%-26.9%+107.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-62.9%-51.6%+787.3%-84.3%+108.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-33.8%+10.8%+32.0%+48.8%+119.7%
CIFR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MARA and RIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MARA is the less volatile stock with a 3.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIFR's 3.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RIOT currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs GREE's 50.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGREE logoGREEGreenidge Generat…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5003.33x3.11x3.87x3.39x3.87x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.42$23.45$24.14$23.61$25.52
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.87$6.66$7.68$7.91$2.95
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+50.4%+54.2%+99.9%+59.2%+81.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.969.674.571.567.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded138K47.6M18.4M19.0M24.9M
Evenly matched — MARA and RIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: MARA as "Buy", RIOT as "Buy", CLSK as "Buy", CIFR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.6% upside for CLSK (target: $20) vs 15.7% for RIOT (target: $28). CLSK is the only dividend payer here at 0.24% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricGREE logoGREEGreenidge Generat…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$16.13$27.90$20.21$27.86
# AnalystsCovering analysts19181012
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises22
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.03
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.0%+0.0%+4.1%+1.1%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

GREE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). CLSK leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallGreenidge Generation Holdin… (GREE)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GREE vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs CIFR: Key Questions Answered

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GREE or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or CIFR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is the stronger pick with 102. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 4% for Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (GREE). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) offers the better valuation at 12. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — GREE or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or CIFR?

Over the past 5 years, Cipher Mining Inc.

(CIFR) delivered a total return of +107. 9%, compared to -99. 2% for Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (GREE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RIOT returned +787. 3% versus CLSK's -84. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — GREE or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or CIFR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

(MARA) is the lower-risk stock at 3. 11β versus Cipher Mining Inc. 's 3. 87β — meaning CIFR is approximately 25% more volatile than MARA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 3% for Cipher Mining Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — GREE or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or CIFR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is pulling ahead at 102. 2% versus -15. 4% for Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (GREE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CleanSpark, Inc. grew EPS 262. 3% year-over-year, compared to -1435. 7% for Cipher Mining Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — GREE or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or CIFR?

CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is the more profitable company, earning 47. 6% net margin versus -367. 2% for Cipher Mining Inc. — meaning it keeps 47. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLSK leads at 41. 6% versus -150. 7% for CIFR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GREE leads at 79. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — GREE or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or CIFR?

In this comparison, CLSK (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. GREE, MARA, RIOT, CIFR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

07

Is GREE or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or CIFR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Riot Platforms, Inc.

(RIOT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+787. 3% 10Y return). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) carries a higher beta of 3. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RIOT: +787. 3%, CLSK: -84. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between GREE and MARA and RIOT and CLSK and CIFR?

These companies operate in different sectors (GREE (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services) and RIOT (Financial Services) and CLSK (Technology) and CIFR (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: GREE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; RIOT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLSK is a small-cap high-growth stock; CIFR is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GREE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 47%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MARA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RIOT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 35%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLSK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CIFR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 24%
  • Gross Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GREE and MARA and RIOT and CLSK and CIFR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GREE: -15.4% · MARA: 38.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.