Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GRMN vs POWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
GRMN vs POWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $46.30B | $4.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.46B | $446M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.74B | $17M |
| Gross Margin | 59.1% | 53.9% |
| Operating Margin | 26.5% | 4.6% |
| Forward P/E | 25.1x | 58.7x |
| Total Debt | $165M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.28B | $59M |
GRMN vs POWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) | 100 | 266.3 | +166.3% |
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 135.3 | +35.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GRMN vs POWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GRMN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.29, yield 1.4%
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 17.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.2%
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs POWI's 239.0%
POWI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +43.3% vs GRMN's +28.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs POWI's 5.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.1x vs 58.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.3% margin vs POWI's 3.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.29 vs POWI's 2.11 | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs POWI's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.3% vs GRMN's +28.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.2% ROA vs POWI's 2.1%, ROIC 22.0% vs 2.4% |
GRMN vs POWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GRMN vs POWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GRMN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GRMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 16.7x POWI's $446M. GRMN is the more profitable business, keeping 23.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to POWI's 3.7%. On growth, GRMN holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.5B | $446M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.2B | $41M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.7B | $17M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.5B | $85M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.1% | +53.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.5% | +4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.3% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +18.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.2% | +2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.5% | -60.0% |
Valuation Metrics
GRMN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.9x trailing earnings, GRMN trades at a 85% valuation discount to POWI's 187.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GRMN's 21.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than POWI's 81.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $46.3B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $44.2B | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.95x | 187.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.14x | 58.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.62x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.40x | 81.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.39x | 9.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.18x | 6.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.97x | 46.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GRMN leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GRMN delivers a 19.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $2 for POWI. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GRMN scores 7/9 vs POWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.9% | +2.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +16.2% | +2.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.0% | +2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.6% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.1B | -$59M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.3B | $59M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $165M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GRMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GRMN five years ago would be worth $17,925 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,871 for POWI. Over the past 12 months, POWI leads with a +43.3% total return vs GRMN's +28.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GRMN at 34.1% vs POWI's -1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.0% | +97.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +28.0% | +43.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +141.0% | -4.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.2% | -1.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +558.6% | +239.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.1% | -1.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GRMN and POWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GRMN is the less volatile stock with a 1.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than POWI's 2.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 2.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $273.32 | $81.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $186.67 | $30.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.8% | +89.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.5 | 61.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 724K | 982K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GRMN and POWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GRMN as "Hold" and POWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.0% upside for GRMN (target: $269) vs 7.8% for POWI (target: $79). For income investors, GRMN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.43% vs POWI's 1.14%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $269.00 | $79.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.43 | $0.84 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +2.4% |
GRMN leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
GRMN vs POWI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GRMN or POWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Garmin Ltd.
(GRMN) is the stronger pick with 15. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) offers the better valuation at 27. 9x trailing P/E (25. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GRMN or POWI?
On trailing P/E, Garmin Ltd.
(GRMN) is the cheapest at 27. 9x versus Power Integrations, Inc. at 187. 9x. On forward P/E, Garmin Ltd. is actually cheaper at 25. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GRMN or POWI?
Over the past 5 years, Garmin Ltd.
(GRMN) delivered a total return of +79. 2%, compared to -1. 3% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GRMN returned +558. 6% versus POWI's +239. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GRMN or POWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Garmin Ltd.
(GRMN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 29β versus Power Integrations, Inc. 's 2. 11β — meaning POWI is approximately 64% more volatile than GRMN relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — GRMN or POWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Garmin Ltd.
(GRMN) is pulling ahead at 15. 1% versus 5. 9% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Garmin Ltd. grew EPS 17. 7% year-over-year, compared to -30. 4% for Power Integrations, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GRMN leads at 14. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GRMN or POWI?
Garmin Ltd.
(GRMN) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 0% net margin versus 5. 0% for Power Integrations, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GRMN leads at 25. 9% versus 4. 8% for POWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GRMN leads at 58. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GRMN or POWI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Garmin Ltd.
(GRMN) trades at 25. 1x forward P/E versus 58. 7x for Power Integrations, Inc. — 33. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GRMN: 12. 0% to $269. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GRMN or POWI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) offers the highest yield at 1. 4%, versus 1. 1% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI).
09Is GRMN or POWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Garmin Ltd.
(GRMN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 29), 1. 4% yield, +558. 6% 10Y return). Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GRMN: +558. 6%, POWI: +239. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GRMN and POWI?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GRMN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.