Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GRMN vs POWI vs MCHP vs QCOM vs AVGO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GRMN
Garmin Ltd.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNYSE • CH
Market Cap$46.30B
5Y Perf.+166.3%
POWI
Power Integrations, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.08B
5Y Perf.+35.3%
MCHP
Microchip Technology Incorporated

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$53.62B
5Y Perf.+106.4%
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$230.92B
5Y Perf.+170.9%
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.04T
5Y Perf.+1376.1%

GRMN vs POWI vs MCHP vs QCOM vs AVGO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GRMN logoGRMN
POWI logoPOWI
MCHP logoMCHP
QCOM logoQCOM
AVGO logoAVGO
IndustryHardware, Equipment & PartsSemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductors
Market Cap$46.30B$4.08B$53.62B$230.92B$2.04T
Revenue (TTM)$7.46B$446M$4.37B$44.49B$68.28B
Net Income (TTM)$1.74B$17M$-97M$9.92B$24.97B
Gross Margin59.1%53.9%55.4%54.8%67.1%
Operating Margin26.5%4.6%4.1%25.5%40.9%
Forward P/E25.1x58.7x63.2x20.4x38.0x
Total Debt$165M$0.00$5.67B$16.37B$65.14B
Cash & Equiv.$2.28B$59M$772M$7.84B$16.18B

GRMN vs POWI vs MCHP vs QCOM vs AVGOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GRMN
POWI
MCHP
QCOM
AVGO
StockMay 20May 26Return
Garmin Ltd. (GRMN)100266.3+166.3%
Power Integrations,… (POWI)100135.3+35.3%
Microchip Technolog… (MCHP)100206.4+106.4%
QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM)100270.9+170.9%
Broadcom Inc. (AVGO)1001476.1+1376.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GRMN vs POWI vs MCHP vs QCOM vs AVGO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AVGO leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. QUALCOMM Incorporated is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and operational efficiency and capital deployment. GRMN and MCHP also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GRMN
Garmin Ltd.
The Defensive Pick

GRMN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.29, Low D/E 1.8%, current ratio 3.63x
  • Beta 1.29, yield 1.4%, current ratio 3.63x
  • Beta 1.29 vs POWI's 2.11
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
POWI
Power Integrations, Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, POWI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
MCHP
Microchip Technology Incorporated
The Income Pick

MCHP is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.

  • 1.8% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs QCOM's 1.6%
Best for: dividends
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
The Income Pick

QCOM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 1.64, yield 1.6%
  • Lower P/E (20.4x vs 63.2x)
  • 18.4% ROA vs MCHP's -0.7%, ROIC 29.1% vs 1.8%
Best for: income & stability
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
The Growth Play

AVGO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 23.9%, EPS growth 287.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.4%
  • 30.2% 10Y total return vs GRMN's 5.6%
  • PEG 0.76 vs QCOM's 9.80
  • 23.9% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAVGO logoAVGO23.9% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3%
ValueQCOM logoQCOMLower P/E (20.4x vs 63.2x)
Quality / MarginsAVGO logoAVGO36.6% margin vs MCHP's -2.2%
Stability / SafetyGRMN logoGRMNBeta 1.29 vs POWI's 2.11
DividendsMCHP logoMCHP1.8% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs QCOM's 1.6%
Momentum (1Y)AVGO logoAVGO+108.2% vs GRMN's +28.0%
Efficiency (ROA)QCOM logoQCOM18.4% ROA vs MCHP's -0.7%, ROIC 29.1% vs 1.8%

GRMN vs POWI vs MCHP vs QCOM vs AVGO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GRMNGarmin Ltd.
FY 2025
Fitness
32.5%$2.4B
Outdoor
28.3%$2.1B
Marine Segment
16.3%$1.2B
Aviation
13.6%$987M
Automotive Mobile
9.2%$665M
POWIPower Integrations, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MCHPMicrochip Technology Incorporated
FY 2025
Semiconductor Products Member
97.0%$4.3B
Technology Licensing Member
3.0%$131M
QCOMQUALCOMM Incorporated
FY 2025
QCT
87.3%$38.4B
QTL
12.7%$5.6B
AVGOBroadcom Inc.
FY 2025
Semiconductor Solutions
57.7%$36.9B
Infrastructure Software
42.3%$27.0B

GRMN vs POWI vs MCHP vs QCOM vs AVGO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLQCOMLAGGINGMCHP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AVGO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

AVGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $68.3B annually — 153.0x POWI's $446M. AVGO is the more profitable business, keeping 36.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MCHP's -2.2%. On growth, AVGO holds the edge at +29.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGRMN logoGRMNGarmin Ltd.POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…MCHP logoMCHPMicrochip Technol…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…AVGO logoAVGOBroadcom Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$7.5B$446M$4.4B$44.5B$68.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2.2B$41M$881M$12.8B$38.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.7B$17M-$97M$9.9B$25.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.5B$85M$820M$12.5B$28.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+59.1%+53.9%+55.4%+54.8%+67.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+26.5%+4.6%+4.1%+25.5%+40.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+23.3%+3.7%-2.2%+22.3%+36.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+19.4%+18.9%+18.8%+28.1%+42.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+14.2%+2.6%+15.6%-3.5%+29.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+21.5%-60.0%+164.2%+173.0%+31.6%
AVGO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

QCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 27.9x trailing earnings, GRMN trades at a 85% valuation discount to POWI's 187.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AVGO offers better value at 1.81x vs QCOM's 21.03x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricGRMN logoGRMNGarmin Ltd.POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…MCHP logoMCHPMicrochip Technol…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…AVGO logoAVGOBroadcom Inc.
Market CapShares × price$46.3B$4.1B$53.6B$230.9B$2.04T
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$44.2B$4.0B$58.5B$239.5B$2.09T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS27.95x187.90x-9999.00x43.73x90.15x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.14x58.74x63.20x20.37x37.99x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.62x21.03x1.81x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple21.40x81.32x55.92x17.16x60.94x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue6.39x9.20x12.18x5.21x31.91x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.18x6.13x7.52x11.42x25.67x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF33.97x46.85x69.45x18.01x75.75x
QCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

QCOM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

QCOM delivers a 40.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $-1 for MCHP. GRMN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVGO's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AVGO scores 8/9 vs MCHP's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricGRMN logoGRMNGarmin Ltd.POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…MCHP logoMCHPMicrochip Technol…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…AVGO logoAVGOBroadcom Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+19.9%+2.4%-1.4%+40.2%+32.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+16.2%+2.1%-0.7%+18.4%+14.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+22.0%+2.4%+1.8%+29.1%+14.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+21.6%+2.9%+2.1%+28.9%+16.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–976568
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.02x0.80x0.77x0.80x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$2.1B-$59M$4.9B$8.5B$49.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2.3B$59M$772M$7.8B$16.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$165M$0$5.7B$16.4B$65.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.78x17.60x9.24x
QCOM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AVGO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AVGO five years ago would be worth $100,886 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,871 for POWI. Over the past 12 months, AVGO leads with a +108.2% total return vs GRMN's +28.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AVGO at 90.8% vs POWI's -1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGRMN logoGRMNGarmin Ltd.POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…MCHP logoMCHPMicrochip Technol…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…AVGO logoAVGOBroadcom Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+19.0%+97.0%+53.1%+27.2%+23.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+28.0%+43.3%+105.4%+53.4%+108.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+141.0%-4.5%+40.6%+111.7%+594.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+79.2%-1.3%+48.7%+82.3%+908.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+558.6%+239.0%+363.4%+382.4%+3019.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+34.1%-1.5%+12.0%+28.4%+90.8%
AVGO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — GRMN and AVGO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

GRMN is the less volatile stock with a 1.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than POWI's 2.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AVGO currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs GRMN's 87.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGRMN logoGRMNGarmin Ltd.POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…MCHP logoMCHPMicrochip Technol…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…AVGO logoAVGOBroadcom Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.29x2.11x1.69x1.64x1.96x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$273.32$81.59$105.91$228.04$437.68
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$186.67$30.86$48.52$121.99$203.69
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+87.8%+89.8%+93.6%+96.1%+98.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.561.378.982.660.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded724K982K9.1M15.6M23.1M
Evenly matched — GRMN and AVGO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — MCHP and QCOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: GRMN as "Hold", POWI as "Buy", MCHP as "Buy", QCOM as "Hold", AVGO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.0% upside for GRMN (target: $269) vs -15.3% for QCOM (target: $186). For income investors, MCHP offers the higher dividend yield at 1.83% vs AVGO's 0.53%.

MetricGRMN logoGRMNGarmin Ltd.POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…MCHP logoMCHPMicrochip Technol…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…AVGO logoAVGOBroadcom Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$269.00$79.00$106.35$185.56$443.72
# AnalystsCovering analysts2816466958
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.4%+1.1%+1.8%+1.6%+0.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises21852316
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.43$0.84$1.82$3.44$2.30
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.5%+2.4%+0.2%+3.8%+0.3%
Evenly matched — MCHP and QCOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

AVGO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). QCOM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallQUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GRMN vs POWI vs MCHP vs QCOM vs AVGO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GRMN or POWI or MCHP or QCOM or AVGO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Broadcom Inc.

(AVGO) is the stronger pick with 23. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) offers the better valuation at 27. 9x trailing P/E (25. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GRMN or POWI or MCHP or QCOM or AVGO?

On trailing P/E, Garmin Ltd.

(GRMN) is the cheapest at 27. 9x versus Power Integrations, Inc. at 187. 9x. On forward P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated is actually cheaper at 20. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Broadcom Inc. wins at 0. 76x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 80x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GRMN or POWI or MCHP or QCOM or AVGO?

Over the past 5 years, Broadcom Inc.

(AVGO) delivered a total return of +908. 9%, compared to -1. 3% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AVGO returned +30. 2% versus POWI's +239. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GRMN or POWI or MCHP or QCOM or AVGO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Garmin Ltd.

(GRMN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 29β versus Power Integrations, Inc. 's 2. 11β — meaning POWI is approximately 64% more volatile than GRMN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 80% for Broadcom Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GRMN or POWI or MCHP or QCOM or AVGO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Broadcom Inc.

(AVGO) is pulling ahead at 23. 9% versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Broadcom Inc. grew EPS 287. 8% year-over-year, compared to -100. 1% for Microchip Technology Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, AVGO leads at 24. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GRMN or POWI or MCHP or QCOM or AVGO?

Broadcom Inc.

(AVGO) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 2% net margin versus -0. 0% for Microchip Technology Incorporated — meaning it keeps 36. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVGO leads at 39. 9% versus 4. 8% for POWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVGO leads at 67. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GRMN or POWI or MCHP or QCOM or AVGO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 76x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 80x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) trades at 20. 4x forward P/E versus 63. 2x for Microchip Technology Incorporated — 42. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GRMN: 12. 0% to $269. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GRMN or POWI or MCHP or QCOM or AVGO?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) offers the highest yield at 1. 8%, versus 0. 5% for Broadcom Inc. (AVGO).

09

Is GRMN or POWI or MCHP or QCOM or AVGO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Garmin Ltd.

(GRMN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 29), 1. 4% yield, +558. 6% 10Y return). Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) carries a higher beta of 1. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GRMN: +558. 6%, AVGO: +30. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GRMN and POWI and MCHP and QCOM and AVGO?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GRMN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MCHP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; AVGO is a mega-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GRMN

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

POWI

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 32%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MCHP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

QCOM

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AVGO

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GRMN and POWI and MCHP and QCOM and AVGO on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GRMN: 14.2% · POWI: 2.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(GRMN: 23.3% · POWI: 3.7%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(GRMN: 27.9x · POWI: 187.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.