Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GRMN vs POWI vs MCHP vs QCOM vs AVGO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
GRMN vs POWI vs MCHP vs QCOM vs AVGO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $46.30B | $4.08B | $53.62B | $230.92B | $2.04T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.46B | $446M | $4.37B | $44.49B | $68.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.74B | $17M | $-97M | $9.92B | $24.97B |
| Gross Margin | 59.1% | 53.9% | 55.4% | 54.8% | 67.1% |
| Operating Margin | 26.5% | 4.6% | 4.1% | 25.5% | 40.9% |
| Forward P/E | 25.1x | 58.7x | 63.2x | 20.4x | 38.0x |
| Total Debt | $165M | $0.00 | $5.67B | $16.37B | $65.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.28B | $59M | $772M | $7.84B | $16.18B |
GRMN vs POWI vs MCHP vs QCOM vs AVGO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) | 100 | 266.3 | +166.3% |
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 135.3 | +35.3% |
| Microchip Technolog… (MCHP) | 100 | 206.4 | +106.4% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 100 | 270.9 | +170.9% |
| Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) | 100 | 1476.1 | +1376.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GRMN vs POWI vs MCHP vs QCOM vs AVGO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GRMN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.29, Low D/E 1.8%, current ratio 3.63x
- Beta 1.29, yield 1.4%, current ratio 3.63x
- Beta 1.29 vs POWI's 2.11
Among these 5 stocks, POWI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MCHP is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 1.8% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs QCOM's 1.6%
QCOM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 1.64, yield 1.6%
- Lower P/E (20.4x vs 63.2x)
- 18.4% ROA vs MCHP's -0.7%, ROIC 29.1% vs 1.8%
AVGO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 23.9%, EPS growth 287.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.4%
- 30.2% 10Y total return vs GRMN's 5.6%
- PEG 0.76 vs QCOM's 9.80
- 23.9% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.9% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.4x vs 63.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.6% margin vs MCHP's -2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.29 vs POWI's 2.11 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs QCOM's 1.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +108.2% vs GRMN's +28.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.4% ROA vs MCHP's -0.7%, ROIC 29.1% vs 1.8% |
GRMN vs POWI vs MCHP vs QCOM vs AVGO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GRMN vs POWI vs MCHP vs QCOM vs AVGO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AVGO leads in 2 of 6 categories
QCOM leads 2 • GRMN leads 0 • POWI leads 0 • MCHP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVGO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $68.3B annually — 153.0x POWI's $446M. AVGO is the more profitable business, keeping 36.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MCHP's -2.2%. On growth, AVGO holds the edge at +29.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.5B | $446M | $4.4B | $44.5B | $68.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.2B | $41M | $881M | $12.8B | $38.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.7B | $17M | -$97M | $9.9B | $25.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.5B | $85M | $820M | $12.5B | $28.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.1% | +53.9% | +55.4% | +54.8% | +67.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.5% | +4.6% | +4.1% | +25.5% | +40.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.3% | +3.7% | -2.2% | +22.3% | +36.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +18.9% | +18.8% | +28.1% | +42.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.2% | +2.6% | +15.6% | -3.5% | +29.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.5% | -60.0% | +164.2% | +173.0% | +31.6% |
Valuation Metrics
QCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.9x trailing earnings, GRMN trades at a 85% valuation discount to POWI's 187.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AVGO offers better value at 1.81x vs QCOM's 21.03x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $46.3B | $4.1B | $53.6B | $230.9B | $2.04T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $44.2B | $4.0B | $58.5B | $239.5B | $2.09T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.95x | 187.90x | -9999.00x | 43.73x | 90.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.14x | 58.74x | 63.20x | 20.37x | 37.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.62x | — | — | 21.03x | 1.81x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.40x | 81.32x | 55.92x | 17.16x | 60.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.39x | 9.20x | 12.18x | 5.21x | 31.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.18x | 6.13x | 7.52x | 11.42x | 25.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.97x | 46.85x | 69.45x | 18.01x | 75.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
QCOM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QCOM delivers a 40.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $-1 for MCHP. GRMN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVGO's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AVGO scores 8/9 vs MCHP's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.9% | +2.4% | -1.4% | +40.2% | +32.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +16.2% | +2.1% | -0.7% | +18.4% | +14.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.0% | +2.4% | +1.8% | +29.1% | +14.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.6% | +2.9% | +2.1% | +28.9% | +16.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | — | 0.80x | 0.77x | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.1B | -$59M | $4.9B | $8.5B | $49.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.3B | $59M | $772M | $7.8B | $16.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $165M | $0 | $5.7B | $16.4B | $65.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 0.78x | 17.60x | 9.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AVGO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AVGO five years ago would be worth $100,886 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,871 for POWI. Over the past 12 months, AVGO leads with a +108.2% total return vs GRMN's +28.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AVGO at 90.8% vs POWI's -1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.0% | +97.0% | +53.1% | +27.2% | +23.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +28.0% | +43.3% | +105.4% | +53.4% | +108.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +141.0% | -4.5% | +40.6% | +111.7% | +594.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.2% | -1.3% | +48.7% | +82.3% | +908.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +558.6% | +239.0% | +363.4% | +382.4% | +3019.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.1% | -1.5% | +12.0% | +28.4% | +90.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GRMN and AVGO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GRMN is the less volatile stock with a 1.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than POWI's 2.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AVGO currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs GRMN's 87.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 2.11x | 1.69x | 1.64x | 1.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $273.32 | $81.59 | $105.91 | $228.04 | $437.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $186.67 | $30.86 | $48.52 | $121.99 | $203.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.8% | +89.8% | +93.6% | +96.1% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.5 | 61.3 | 78.9 | 82.6 | 60.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 724K | 982K | 9.1M | 15.6M | 23.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MCHP and QCOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GRMN as "Hold", POWI as "Buy", MCHP as "Buy", QCOM as "Hold", AVGO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.0% upside for GRMN (target: $269) vs -15.3% for QCOM (target: $186). For income investors, MCHP offers the higher dividend yield at 1.83% vs AVGO's 0.53%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $269.00 | $79.00 | $106.35 | $185.56 | $443.72 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 16 | 46 | 69 | 58 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | +1.1% | +1.8% | +1.6% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 18 | 5 | 23 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.43 | $0.84 | $1.82 | $3.44 | $2.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +2.4% | +0.2% | +3.8% | +0.3% |
AVGO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). QCOM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
GRMN vs POWI vs MCHP vs QCOM vs AVGO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GRMN or POWI or MCHP or QCOM or AVGO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) is the stronger pick with 23. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) offers the better valuation at 27. 9x trailing P/E (25. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GRMN or POWI or MCHP or QCOM or AVGO?
On trailing P/E, Garmin Ltd.
(GRMN) is the cheapest at 27. 9x versus Power Integrations, Inc. at 187. 9x. On forward P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated is actually cheaper at 20. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Broadcom Inc. wins at 0. 76x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 80x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GRMN or POWI or MCHP or QCOM or AVGO?
Over the past 5 years, Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) delivered a total return of +908. 9%, compared to -1. 3% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AVGO returned +30. 2% versus POWI's +239. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GRMN or POWI or MCHP or QCOM or AVGO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Garmin Ltd.
(GRMN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 29β versus Power Integrations, Inc. 's 2. 11β — meaning POWI is approximately 64% more volatile than GRMN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 80% for Broadcom Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GRMN or POWI or MCHP or QCOM or AVGO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) is pulling ahead at 23. 9% versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Broadcom Inc. grew EPS 287. 8% year-over-year, compared to -100. 1% for Microchip Technology Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, AVGO leads at 24. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GRMN or POWI or MCHP or QCOM or AVGO?
Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 2% net margin versus -0. 0% for Microchip Technology Incorporated — meaning it keeps 36. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVGO leads at 39. 9% versus 4. 8% for POWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVGO leads at 67. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GRMN or POWI or MCHP or QCOM or AVGO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 76x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 80x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) trades at 20. 4x forward P/E versus 63. 2x for Microchip Technology Incorporated — 42. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GRMN: 12. 0% to $269. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GRMN or POWI or MCHP or QCOM or AVGO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) offers the highest yield at 1. 8%, versus 0. 5% for Broadcom Inc. (AVGO).
09Is GRMN or POWI or MCHP or QCOM or AVGO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Garmin Ltd.
(GRMN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 29), 1. 4% yield, +558. 6% 10Y return). Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) carries a higher beta of 1. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GRMN: +558. 6%, AVGO: +30. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GRMN and POWI and MCHP and QCOM and AVGO?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GRMN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MCHP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; AVGO is a mega-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.