Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GRNT vs VTLE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
GRNT vs VTLE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $748M | $693M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $345M | $1.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $24M | $-1.31B |
| Gross Margin | 28.9% | 44.2% |
| Operating Margin | 13.5% | -58.3% |
| Forward P/E | 8.9x | 4.0x |
| Total Debt | $18M | $2.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $40M |
GRNT vs VTLE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Granite Ridge Resou… (GRNT) | 100 | 58.2 | -41.8% |
| Vital Energy, Inc. (VTLE) | 100 | 151.8 | +51.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GRNT vs VTLE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GRNT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.41, yield 7.8%
- -27.4% 10Y total return vs VTLE's -92.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.41, Low D/E 2.9%, current ratio 1.25x
VTLE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 26.2%, EPS growth -114.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.9%
- 26.2% revenue growth vs GRNT's -100.0%
- Lower P/E (4.0x vs 8.9x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.2% revenue growth vs GRNT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.0x vs 8.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.1% margin vs VTLE's -69.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.41 vs VTLE's 1.32, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.8% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.3% vs GRNT's +24.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.9% ROA vs VTLE's -27.9%, ROIC 4.8% vs -0.3% |
GRNT vs VTLE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GRNT vs VTLE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GRNT and VTLE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VTLE is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 5.5x GRNT's $345M. GRNT is the more profitable business, keeping 7.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VTLE's -69.3%. On growth, VTLE holds the edge at -8.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $345M | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $204M | -$334M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $24M | -$1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $84M | $656M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.9% | +44.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.5% | -58.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | -69.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.4% | +34.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -111.8% | -2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
VTLE leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, VTLE's 4.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GRNT's 16.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $748M | $693M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $751M | $3.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.67x | -3.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.91x | 3.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.17x | 4.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.23x | 0.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.52x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GRNT leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GRNT delivers a 3.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-75 for VTLE. GRNT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VTLE's 0.95x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.9% | -74.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.9% | -27.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.8% | -0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.9% | -0.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $40M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.63x | -5.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GRNT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GRNT five years ago would be worth $7,395 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,927 for VTLE. Over the past 12 months, VTLE leads with a +29.3% total return vs GRNT's +24.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GRNT at 5.3% vs VTLE's -25.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.1% | — |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.5% | +29.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.8% | -59.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.1% | -50.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.4% | -92.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.3% | -25.7% |
Risk & Volatility
GRNT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GRNT is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VTLE's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GRNT currently trades 84.8% from its 52-week high vs VTLE's 81.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.41x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.72 | $22.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.18 | $13.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.8% | +81.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.1 | 53.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 944K | 17 |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GRNT as "Hold" and VTLE as "Hold". GRNT is the only dividend payer here at 7.76% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $23.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.44 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% |
GRNT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). VTLE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
GRNT vs VTLE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GRNT or VTLE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Vital Energy, Inc.
(VTLE) is the stronger pick with 26. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Granite Ridge Resources, Inc (GRNT). Granite Ridge Resources, Inc (GRNT) offers the better valuation at 31. 7x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Granite Ridge Resources, Inc (GRNT) a "Hold" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GRNT or VTLE?
On forward P/E, Vital Energy, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 4. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GRNT or VTLE?
Over the past 5 years, Granite Ridge Resources, Inc (GRNT) delivered a total return of -26.
1%, compared to -50. 7% for Vital Energy, Inc. (VTLE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GRNT returned -27. 4% versus VTLE's -92. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GRNT or VTLE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Granite Ridge Resources, Inc (GRNT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
41β versus Vital Energy, Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning VTLE is approximately 224% more volatile than GRNT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Granite Ridge Resources, Inc (GRNT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 95% for Vital Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GRNT or VTLE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vital Energy, Inc.
(VTLE) is pulling ahead at 26. 2% versus -100. 0% for Granite Ridge Resources, Inc (GRNT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Granite Ridge Resources, Inc grew EPS 28. 6% year-over-year, compared to -114. 2% for Vital Energy, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GRNT or VTLE?
Granite Ridge Resources, Inc (GRNT) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
1% net margin versus -8. 9% for Vital Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GRNT leads at 13. 5% versus -1. 2% for VTLE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VTLE leads at 31. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GRNT or VTLE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Vital Energy, Inc.
(VTLE) trades at 4. 0x forward P/E versus 8. 9x for Granite Ridge Resources, Inc — 4. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — GRNT or VTLE?
In this comparison, GRNT (7.
8% yield) pays a dividend. VTLE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GRNT or VTLE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Granite Ridge Resources, Inc (GRNT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
41), 7. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GRNT: -27. 4%, VTLE: -92. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GRNT and VTLE?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GRNT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; VTLE is a small-cap high-growth stock. GRNT pays a dividend while VTLE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.