Asset Management - Global
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GROW vs BEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
GROW vs BEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management - Global | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $35M | $16.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8M | $8.77B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $98K | $812M |
| Gross Margin | 41.7% | 80.3% |
| Operating Margin | -35.3% | 6.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.4x |
| Total Debt | $83K | $13.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $3.57B |
GROW vs BEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. Global Investo… (GROW) | 100 | 125.4 | +25.4% |
| Franklin Resources,… (BEN) | 100 | 165.1 | +65.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GROW vs BEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GROW is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 64.9% 10Y total return vs BEN's 24.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 20.87x
- Beta 0.71, yield 3.5%, current ratio 20.87x
BEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 1.31, yield 4.3%
- Rev growth 3.5%, EPS growth 7.1%
- 3.5% NII/revenue growth vs GROW's -23.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.5% NII/revenue growth vs GROW's -23.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.7% vs GROW's 0.8% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs BEN's 1.31, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs GROW's 3.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +61.7% vs GROW's +29.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.7% vs GROW's 0.8% |
GROW vs BEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GROW vs BEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BEN leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.8B annually — 1037.7x GROW's $8M. BEN is the more profitable business, keeping 6.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GROW's -4.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8M | $8.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $98,000 | $812M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$235,000 | $938M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.7% | +80.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -35.3% | +6.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +6.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.8% | +10.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
GROW leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $35M | $16.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $25.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -104.80x | 34.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 22.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.14x | 1.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.77x | 1.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BEN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BEN delivers a 5.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $0 for GROW. GROW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BEN's 0.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BEN scores 6/9 vs GROW's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.2% | +5.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.2% | +2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.7% | +1.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.2% | +2.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.94x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$24M | $9.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $3.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $83,000 | $13.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 600.00x | 15.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BEN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BEN five years ago would be worth $10,965 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,258 for GROW. Over the past 12 months, BEN leads with a +61.7% total return vs GROW's +29.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BEN at 11.3% vs GROW's 1.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.7% | +32.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.0% | +61.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.3% | +37.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.4% | +9.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.9% | +24.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.1% | +11.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GROW and BEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GROW is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BEN's 1.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BEN currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs GROW's 71.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 1.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.65 | $31.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.10 | $19.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.8% | +99.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.3 | 75.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 25K | 5.1M |
Analyst Outlook
BEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, BEN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.26% vs GROW's 3.46%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $28.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | +4.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | $1.33 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.6% | +1.5% |
BEN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GROW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
GROW vs BEN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GROW or BEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Franklin Resources, Inc.
(BEN) is the stronger pick with 3. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN) offers the better valuation at 34. 2x trailing P/E (11. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN) a "Hold" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GROW or BEN?
Over the past 5 years, Franklin Resources, Inc.
(BEN) delivered a total return of +9. 7%, compared to -57. 4% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GROW returned +64. 9% versus BEN's +24. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GROW or BEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), U.
S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus Franklin Resources, Inc. 's 1. 31β — meaning BEN is approximately 85% more volatile than GROW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 94% for Franklin Resources, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GROW or BEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Franklin Resources, Inc.
(BEN) is pulling ahead at 3. 5% versus -23. 1% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Franklin Resources, Inc. grew EPS 7. 1% year-over-year, compared to -126. 6% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GROW or BEN?
Franklin Resources, Inc.
(BEN) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 0% net margin versus -4. 0% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BEN leads at 6. 9% versus -35. 3% for GROW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BEN leads at 80. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GROW or BEN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN) offers the highest yield at 4. 3%, versus 3. 5% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW).
07Is GROW or BEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, U.
S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GROW: +64. 9%, BEN: +24. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GROW and BEN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.