Asset Management - Global
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GROW vs BEN vs IVZ vs DHIL vs TROW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
GROW vs BEN vs IVZ vs DHIL vs TROW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management - Global | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $35M | $15.86B | $11.92B | $473M | $22.54B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8M | $8.77B | $6.38B | $158M | $7.31B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $98K | $812M | $-243M | $49M | $2.09B |
| Gross Margin | 41.7% | 80.3% | 43.2% | 96.0% | 62.7% |
| Operating Margin | -35.3% | 6.9% | -10.9% | 38.4% | 29.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.2x | 10.4x | 9.5x | 11.2x |
| Total Debt | $83K | $13.30B | $10.12B | $6.40B | $860M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $3.57B | $1.98B | $42M | $3.38B |
GROW vs BEN vs IVZ vs DHIL vs TROW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. Global Investo… (GROW) | 100 | 125.4 | +25.4% |
| Franklin Resources,… (BEN) | 100 | 161.8 | +61.8% |
| Invesco Ltd. (IVZ) | 100 | 336.6 | +236.6% |
| Diamond Hill Invest… (DHIL) | 100 | 164.0 | +64.0% |
| T. Rowe Price Group… (TROW) | 100 | 85.7 | -14.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GROW vs BEN vs IVZ vs DHIL vs TROW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GROW lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, BEN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
IVZ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 5.1% NII/revenue growth vs GROW's -23.1%
- +93.1% vs TROW's +18.9%
DHIL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.57, yield 5.7%
- Rev growth 4.5%, EPS growth 14.4%
- 55.4% 10Y total return vs TROW's 93.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, current ratio 75115.85x
TROW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for bank quality.
- NIM 3.4% vs DHIL's 0.7%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs GROW's 0.8% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs GROW's 0.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.1% NII/revenue growth vs GROW's -23.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 11.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs GROW's 0.8% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs IVZ's 1.67 | |
| Dividends | 5.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BEN's 4.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +93.1% vs TROW's +18.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs GROW's 0.8% |
GROW vs BEN vs IVZ vs DHIL vs TROW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GROW vs BEN vs IVZ vs DHIL vs TROW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DHIL leads in 3 of 6 categories
GROW leads 1 • IVZ leads 1 • BEN leads 0 • TROW leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DHIL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.8B annually — 1037.7x GROW's $8M. DHIL is the more profitable business, keeping 30.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IVZ's -4.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8M | $8.8B | $6.4B | $158M | $7.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $1.2B | $1.2B | $62M | $2.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $98,000 | $812M | -$243M | $49M | $2.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$235,000 | $938M | $1.9B | $44.5B | $2.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.7% | +80.3% | +43.2% | +96.0% | +62.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -35.3% | +6.9% | -10.9% | +38.4% | +29.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +6.0% | -4.4% | +30.9% | +28.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.8% | +10.4% | +22.6% | -57.4% | +20.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +100.0% | +34.2% | +25.3% | +3.7% |
Valuation Metrics
GROW leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, DHIL trades at a 71% valuation discount to BEN's 33.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TROW's 7.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DHIL's 110.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $35M | $15.9B | $11.9B | $473M | $22.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $25.6B | $20.1B | $6.8B | $20.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -104.80x | 33.54x | -16.77x | 9.77x | 11.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.21x | 10.44x | 9.48x | 11.22x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.18x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 22.53x | 16.34x | 110.39x | 7.64x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.14x | 1.81x | 1.87x | 3.00x | 3.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.77x | 1.11x | 0.94x | 2.70x | 1.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.40x | 8.27x | — | 15.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DHIL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DHIL delivers a 27.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-2 for IVZ. GROW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DHIL's 36.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BEN scores 6/9 vs GROW's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.2% | +5.6% | -1.7% | +27.0% | +17.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.2% | +2.5% | -0.9% | +19.5% | +14.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.7% | +1.6% | -2.3% | +1.3% | +13.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.2% | +2.0% | -2.6% | +26.0% | +15.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.94x | 0.78x | 36.26x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$24M | $9.7B | $8.1B | $6.4B | -$2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $3.6B | $2.0B | $42M | $3.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $83,000 | $13.3B | $10.1B | $6.4B | $860M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 600.00x | 15.19x | -6.19x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IVZ leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DHIL five years ago would be worth $12,834 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,143 for GROW. Over the past 12 months, IVZ leads with a +93.1% total return vs TROW's +18.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IVZ at 21.6% vs GROW's 1.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.7% | +29.6% | +0.4% | +2.8% | +0.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.8% | +55.5% | +93.1% | +33.8% | +18.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.3% | +35.3% | +79.8% | +22.4% | +11.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.6% | +7.4% | +8.2% | +28.3% | -30.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.4% | +23.5% | +22.1% | +55.4% | +93.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.1% | +10.6% | +21.6% | +7.0% | +3.7% |
Risk & Volatility
DHIL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DHIL is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IVZ's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DHIL currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs GROW's 71.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 1.31x | 1.67x | 0.57x | 1.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.65 | $31.44 | $29.61 | $175.03 | $118.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.10 | $20.08 | $14.10 | $114.11 | $85.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.8% | +97.1% | +90.6% | +100.0% | +87.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.5 | 78.4 | 69.4 | 70.5 | 78.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 25K | 5.1M | 5.1M | 23K | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BEN and DHIL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BEN as "Hold", IVZ as "Hold", TROW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 10.8% upside for IVZ (target: $30) vs -5.8% for BEN (target: $29). For income investors, DHIL offers the higher dividend yield at 5.71% vs IVZ's 3.10%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $28.75 | $29.72 | — | $101.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 27 | 28 | — | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | +4.3% | +3.1% | +5.7% | +4.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | $1.33 | $0.83 | $9.98 | $5.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.6% | +1.5% | +15.6% | +3.6% | +2.8% |
DHIL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GROW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
GROW vs BEN vs IVZ vs DHIL vs TROW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GROW or BEN or IVZ or DHIL or TROW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Invesco Ltd.
(IVZ) is the stronger pick with 5. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (DHIL) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN) a "Hold" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GROW or BEN or IVZ or DHIL or TROW?
On trailing P/E, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus Franklin Resources, Inc. at 33. 5x. On forward P/E, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GROW or BEN or IVZ or DHIL or TROW?
Over the past 5 years, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) delivered a total return of +28. 3%, compared to -58. 6% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TROW returned +93. 6% versus IVZ's +22. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GROW or BEN or IVZ or DHIL or TROW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus Invesco Ltd. 's 1. 67β — meaning IVZ is approximately 192% more volatile than DHIL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 36% for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GROW or BEN or IVZ or DHIL or TROW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Invesco Ltd.
(IVZ) is pulling ahead at 5. 1% versus -23. 1% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. grew EPS 14. 4% year-over-year, compared to -235. 6% for Invesco Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GROW or BEN or IVZ or DHIL or TROW?
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 9% net margin versus -4. 4% for Invesco Ltd. — meaning it keeps 30. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DHIL leads at 38. 4% versus -35. 3% for GROW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DHIL leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GROW or BEN or IVZ or DHIL or TROW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 2x for T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. — 1. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IVZ: 10. 8% to $29. 72.
08Which pays a better dividend — GROW or BEN or IVZ or DHIL or TROW?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (DHIL) offers the highest yield at 5. 7%, versus 3. 1% for Invesco Ltd. (IVZ).
09Is GROW or BEN or IVZ or DHIL or TROW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57), 5. 7% yield). Invesco Ltd. (IVZ) carries a higher beta of 1. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DHIL: +55. 4%, IVZ: +22. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GROW and BEN and IVZ and DHIL and TROW?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GROW is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BEN is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; IVZ is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; DHIL is a small-cap deep-value stock; TROW is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.