Asset Management - Global
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GROW vs DHIL vs HNNA vs CSWC vs BEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
GROW vs DHIL vs HNNA vs CSWC vs BEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management - Global | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $35M | $473M | $78M | $1.44B | $16.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8M | $158M | $36M | $164M | $8.77B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $98K | $49M | $8M | $103M | $812M |
| Gross Margin | 41.7% | 96.0% | 70.1% | 66.5% | 80.3% |
| Operating Margin | -35.3% | 38.4% | 37.0% | 48.5% | 6.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.5x | 7.8x | 10.1x | 11.4x |
| Total Debt | $83K | $6.40B | $41M | $956M | $13.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $42M | $72M | $43M | $3.57B |
GROW vs DHIL vs HNNA vs CSWC vs BEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. Global Investo… (GROW) | 100 | 125.4 | +25.4% |
| Diamond Hill Invest… (DHIL) | 100 | 164.0 | +64.0% |
| Hennessy Advisors, … (HNNA) | 100 | 123.9 | +23.9% |
| Capital Southwest C… (CSWC) | 100 | 173.0 | +73.0% |
| Franklin Resources,… (BEN) | 100 | 165.1 | +65.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GROW vs DHIL vs HNNA vs CSWC vs BEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GROW lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
DHIL is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 1.14 vs HNNA's 2.12
- Beta 0.57, yield 5.7%, current ratio 75115.85x
HNNA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 19.9%, EPS growth 38.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.30, Low D/E 41.4%, current ratio 12.72x
- 19.9% NII/revenue growth vs GROW's -23.1%
- Lower P/E (7.8x vs 11.4x)
CSWC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 10.1%
- 231.6% 10Y total return vs DHIL's 52.8%
- NIM 7.0% vs DHIL's 0.7%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs GROW's 0.8% (lower = leaner)
BEN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +61.7% vs HNNA's -1.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.9% NII/revenue growth vs GROW's -23.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.8x vs 11.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs GROW's 0.8% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.30 vs BEN's 1.31, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 10.1% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs BEN's 4.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +61.7% vs HNNA's -1.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs GROW's 0.8% |
GROW vs DHIL vs HNNA vs CSWC vs BEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GROW vs DHIL vs HNNA vs CSWC vs BEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CSWC leads in 2 of 6 categories
GROW leads 0 • DHIL leads 0 • HNNA leads 0 • BEN leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSWC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.8B annually — 1037.7x GROW's $8M. CSWC is the more profitable business, keeping 43.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GROW's -4.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8M | $158M | $36M | $164M | $8.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $62M | $11M | $142M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $98,000 | $49M | $8M | $103M | $812M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$235,000 | $44.5B | $10M | -$69M | $938M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.7% | +96.0% | +70.1% | +66.5% | +80.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -35.3% | +38.4% | +37.0% | +48.5% | +6.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +30.9% | +28.0% | +43.1% | +6.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.8% | -57.4% | +37.6% | -132.6% | +10.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +25.3% | -27.3% | +113.3% | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GROW and DHIL and HNNA each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.8x trailing earnings, HNNA trades at a 77% valuation discount to BEN's 34.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DHIL offers better value at 1.18x vs HNNA's 2.12x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $35M | $473M | $78M | $1.4B | $16.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $6.8B | $46M | $2.4B | $25.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -104.80x | 9.77x | 7.80x | 16.46x | 34.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.48x | — | 10.14x | 11.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.18x | 2.12x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 110.39x | 3.44x | 27.57x | 22.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.14x | 3.00x | 2.20x | 8.78x | 1.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.77x | 2.70x | 0.79x | 1.40x | 1.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 5.86x | — | 17.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — GROW and DHIL and HNNA each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DHIL delivers a 27.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $0 for GROW. GROW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DHIL's 36.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HNNA scores 7/9 vs CSWC's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.2% | +27.0% | +8.5% | +10.3% | +5.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.2% | +19.5% | +5.3% | +4.8% | +2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.7% | +1.3% | +7.3% | +3.5% | +1.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.2% | +26.0% | +8.7% | +4.6% | +2.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 36.26x | 0.41x | 1.08x | 0.94x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$24M | $6.4B | -$32M | $913M | $9.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $42M | $72M | $43M | $3.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $83,000 | $6.4B | $41M | $956M | $13.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 600.00x | — | 7.35x | 2.91x | 15.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CSWC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CSWC five years ago would be worth $15,214 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,258 for GROW. Over the past 12 months, BEN leads with a +61.7% total return vs HNNA's -1.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CSWC at 20.9% vs GROW's 1.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.7% | +2.8% | +4.4% | +12.3% | +32.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.0% | +35.2% | -1.1% | +33.7% | +61.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.3% | +22.4% | +62.8% | +76.9% | +37.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.4% | +28.7% | +34.5% | +52.1% | +9.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.9% | +52.8% | -34.6% | +231.6% | +24.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.1% | +7.0% | +17.6% | +20.9% | +11.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DHIL and HNNA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HNNA is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BEN's 1.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DHIL currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs GROW's 71.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 0.57x | 0.30x | 0.84x | 1.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.65 | $175.03 | $13.19 | $24.43 | $31.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.10 | $114.11 | $8.90 | $19.37 | $19.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.8% | +100.0% | +75.1% | +99.0% | +99.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.3 | 70.5 | 54.0 | 66.1 | 75.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 25K | 23K | 9K | 666K | 5.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CSWC and BEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CSWC as "Buy", BEN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -7.0% upside for CSWC (target: $23) vs -7.7% for BEN (target: $29). For income investors, CSWC offers the higher dividend yield at 10.12% vs GROW's 3.46%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $22.50 | $28.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 10 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | +5.7% | +5.4% | +10.1% | +4.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | $9.98 | $0.54 | $2.45 | $1.33 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.6% | +3.6% | +0.6% | 0.0% | +1.5% |
CSWC leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Total Returns. 4 categories are tied.
GROW vs DHIL vs HNNA vs CSWC vs BEN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GROW or DHIL or HNNA or CSWC or BEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hennessy Advisors, Inc.
(HNNA) is the stronger pick with 19. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). Hennessy Advisors, Inc. (HNNA) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GROW or DHIL or HNNA or CSWC or BEN?
On trailing P/E, Hennessy Advisors, Inc.
(HNNA) is the cheapest at 7. 8x versus Franklin Resources, Inc. at 34. 2x. On forward P/E, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GROW or DHIL or HNNA or CSWC or BEN?
Over the past 5 years, Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) delivered a total return of +52.
1%, compared to -57. 4% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSWC returned +231. 6% versus HNNA's -34. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GROW or DHIL or HNNA or CSWC or BEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hennessy Advisors, Inc.
(HNNA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 30β versus Franklin Resources, Inc. 's 1. 31β — meaning BEN is approximately 332% more volatile than HNNA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 36% for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GROW or DHIL or HNNA or CSWC or BEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hennessy Advisors, Inc.
(HNNA) is pulling ahead at 19. 9% versus -23. 1% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hennessy Advisors, Inc. grew EPS 38. 0% year-over-year, compared to -126. 6% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GROW or DHIL or HNNA or CSWC or BEN?
Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) is the more profitable company, earning 43.
1% net margin versus -4. 0% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. — meaning it keeps 43. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CSWC leads at 48. 5% versus -35. 3% for GROW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DHIL leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GROW or DHIL or HNNA or CSWC or BEN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 4x for Franklin Resources, Inc. — 2. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CSWC: -7. 0% to $22. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — GROW or DHIL or HNNA or CSWC or BEN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) offers the highest yield at 10. 1%, versus 3. 5% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW).
09Is GROW or DHIL or HNNA or CSWC or BEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hennessy Advisors, Inc.
(HNNA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 30), 5. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HNNA: -34. 6%, BEN: +24. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GROW and DHIL and HNNA and CSWC and BEN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GROW is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DHIL is a small-cap deep-value stock; HNNA is a small-cap high-growth stock; CSWC is a small-cap deep-value stock; BEN is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.