Other Precious Metals
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GROY vs RGLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
GROY vs RGLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Other Precious Metals | Gold |
| Market Cap | $630M | $16.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16M | $1.31B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $634M |
| Gross Margin | 75.7% | 44.4% |
| Operating Margin | 9.9% | 64.2% |
| Forward P/E | 62.1x | 19.5x |
| Total Debt | $101K | $966M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $234M |
GROY vs RGLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gold Royalty Corp. (GROY) | 100 | 79.8 | -20.2% |
| Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) | 100 | 216.1 | +116.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GROY vs RGLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GROY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 54.5%, EPS growth -18.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 58.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 4.88x
- 54.5% revenue growth vs RGLD's 44.6%
RGLD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 24 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 0.7%
- 337.6% 10Y total return vs GROY's 2.0%
- Beta 0.63, yield 0.7%, current ratio 3.12x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 54.5% revenue growth vs RGLD's 44.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.5x vs 62.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 48.5% margin vs GROY's -26.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs GROY's 0.74 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield; 24-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +131.6% vs RGLD's +28.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.4% ROA vs GROY's -0.5%, ROIC 9.2% vs 0.2% |
GROY vs RGLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GROY vs RGLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RGLD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RGLD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 83.7x GROY's $16M. RGLD is the more profitable business, keeping 48.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GROY's -26.5%. On growth, RGLD holds the edge at +144.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16M | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $634M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | -$244M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.7% | +44.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +64.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -26.5% | +48.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.5% | -18.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +34.2% | +144.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +78.9% | +91.9% |
Valuation Metrics
RGLD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, RGLD's 20.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GROY's 139.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $630M | $16.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $617M | $16.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -152.12x | 34.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 62.11x | 19.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.47x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 139.36x | 20.06x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 40.34x | 15.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | 2.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 629.66x | 22.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RGLD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RGLD delivers a 11.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-1 for GROY. GROY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RGLD's 0.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GROY scores 6/9 vs RGLD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.7% | +11.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.5% | +9.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.2% | +9.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.2% | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12M | $732M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $234M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $101,000 | $966M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.43x | 52.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RGLD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RGLD five years ago would be worth $20,047 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,300 for GROY. Over the past 12 months, GROY leads with a +131.6% total return vs RGLD's +28.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RGLD at 19.0% vs GROY's 16.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.0% | +5.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +131.6% | +28.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.6% | +68.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.0% | +100.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.0% | +337.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.6% | +19.0% |
Risk & Volatility
RGLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RGLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GROY's 0.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RGLD currently trades 76.0% from its 52-week high vs GROY's 65.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 0.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.46 | $306.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.45 | $150.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.8% | +76.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.9 | 42.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
RGLD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GROY as "Buy" and RGLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.8% upside for GROY (target: $6) vs 31.0% for RGLD (target: $305). RGLD is the only dividend payer here at 0.73% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.88 | $304.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 24 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.70 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RGLD leads in 6 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
GROY vs RGLD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GROY or RGLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gold Royalty Corp.
(GROY) is the stronger pick with 54. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 44. 6% for Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD). Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) offers the better valuation at 34. 8x trailing P/E (19. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gold Royalty Corp. (GROY) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GROY or RGLD?
On forward P/E, Royal Gold, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 19. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GROY or RGLD?
Over the past 5 years, Royal Gold, Inc.
(RGLD) delivered a total return of +100. 5%, compared to -27. 0% for Gold Royalty Corp. (GROY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RGLD returned +337. 6% versus GROY's +2. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GROY or RGLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Royal Gold, Inc.
(RGLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus Gold Royalty Corp. 's 0. 74β — meaning GROY is approximately 18% more volatile than RGLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gold Royalty Corp. (GROY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 13% for Royal Gold, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GROY or RGLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gold Royalty Corp.
(GROY) is pulling ahead at 54. 5% versus 44. 6% for Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Royal Gold, Inc. grew EPS 32. 5% year-over-year, compared to -18. 0% for Gold Royalty Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GROY leads at 58. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GROY or RGLD?
Royal Gold, Inc.
(RGLD) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 2% net margin versus -26. 5% for Gold Royalty Corp. — meaning it keeps 45. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RGLD leads at 64. 5% versus 10. 9% for GROY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GROY leads at 75. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GROY or RGLD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Royal Gold, Inc.
(RGLD) trades at 19. 5x forward P/E versus 62. 1x for Gold Royalty Corp. — 42. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GROY: 63. 8% to $5. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — GROY or RGLD?
In this comparison, RGLD (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. GROY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GROY or RGLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Royal Gold, Inc.
(RGLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), 0. 7% yield, +337. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RGLD: +337. 6%, GROY: +2. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GROY and RGLD?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
RGLD pays a dividend while GROY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.