Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GRVY vs EA vs TTWO vs NCTY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
GRVY vs EA vs TTWO vs NCTY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
| Market Cap | $421M | $50.26B | $46.67B | $26M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $561.99B | $7.53B | $6.56B | $289M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $80.77B | $887M | $-3.96B | $-228M |
| Gross Margin | 36.2% | 79.0% | 55.3% | -14.1% |
| Operating Margin | 15.8% | 15.4% | -59.3% | -140.6% |
| Forward P/E | 8.9x | 23.4x | 57.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $1.49B | $4.11B | $235M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $203.59B | $2.86B | $1.46B | $59M |
GRVY vs EA vs TTWO vs NCTY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gravity Co., Ltd. (GRVY) | 100 | 119.5 | +19.5% |
| Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) | 100 | 163.5 | +63.5% |
| Take-Two Interactiv… (TTWO) | 100 | 164.1 | +64.1% |
| The9 Limited (NCTY) | 100 | 9.8 | -90.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GRVY vs EA vs TTWO vs NCTY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GRVY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 30.2% 10Y total return vs TTWO's 5.4%
- PEG 5.11 vs EA's 5.69
- 13.4% revenue growth vs NCTY's -7.4%
- Better valuation composite
EA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.18, yield 0.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.18, Low D/E 22.0%, current ratio 1.05x
- Beta 0.18, yield 0.4%, current ratio 1.05x
- Beta 0.18 vs NCTY's 2.56, lower leverage
TTWO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.3%, EPS growth -16.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.1%
NCTY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.4% revenue growth vs NCTY's -7.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.4% margin vs NCTY's -78.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.18 vs NCTY's 2.56, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.7% vs NCTY's -46.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs NCTY's -45.2%, ROIC 15.5% vs -37.2% |
GRVY vs EA vs TTWO vs NCTY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GRVY vs EA vs TTWO vs NCTY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GRVY leads in 2 of 6 categories
EA leads 2 • TTWO leads 0 • NCTY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GRVY and EA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GRVY is the larger business by revenue, generating $562.0B annually — 1942.5x NCTY's $289M. GRVY is the more profitable business, keeping 14.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NCTY's -78.9%. On growth, GRVY holds the edge at +38.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $562.0B | $7.5B | $6.6B | $289M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $98.2B | $1.2B | -$2.7B | -$407M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $80.8B | $887M | -$4.0B | -$228M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $2.3B | $488M | -$62M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.2% | +79.0% | +55.3% | -14.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +15.4% | -59.3% | -140.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +11.8% | -60.4% | -78.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +30.8% | +7.4% | -21.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.9% | +11.1% | +24.9% | -74.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.4% | +90.6% | +29.6% | -183.2% |
Valuation Metrics
GRVY leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.9x trailing earnings, GRVY trades at a 84% valuation discount to EA's 57.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GRVY offers better value at 5.11x vs EA's 13.93x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $421M | $50.3B | $46.7B | $26M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $281M | $48.9B | $49.3B | $52M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.94x | 57.22x | -8.74x | -0.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 23.38x | 57.26x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 5.11x | 13.93x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.09x | 39.81x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.08x | 6.67x | 8.28x | 1.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.96x | 7.51x | 18.31x | 1.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.04x | 21.64x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GRVY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EA delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-121 for NCTY. EA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TTWO's 1.92x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GRVY scores 6/9 vs NCTY's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.1% | +14.2% | -113.4% | -120.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.8% | +7.1% | -39.6% | -45.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.5% | +14.7% | -49.8% | -37.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.1% | +12.7% | -57.1% | -70.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.22x | 1.92x | 0.97x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$203.6B | -$1.4B | $2.6B | $176M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $203.6B | $2.9B | $1.5B | $59M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $1.5B | $4.1B | $235M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 15.33x | — | -69.94x | -9.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — GRVY and EA and TTWO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EA five years ago would be worth $14,364 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $321 for NCTY. Over the past 12 months, EA leads with a +29.7% total return vs NCTY's -46.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TTWO at 21.2% vs NCTY's -11.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.4% | -1.6% | -11.2% | -9.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.7% | +29.7% | -1.3% | -46.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.7% | +61.5% | +77.8% | -31.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.8% | +43.6% | +31.4% | -96.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3024.2% | +217.6% | +544.3% | -99.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.1% | +17.3% | +21.2% | -11.6% |
Risk & Volatility
EA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EA is the less volatile stock with a 0.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NCTY's 2.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EA currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs NCTY's 45.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.61x | 0.18x | 0.63x | 2.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $74.75 | $204.89 | $264.79 | $12.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $54.54 | $141.19 | $187.63 | $5.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.1% | +98.0% | +84.4% | +45.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.9 | 35.1 | 62.5 | 54.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 29K | 1.8M | 1.6M | 31K |
Analyst Outlook
EA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EA as "Hold", TTWO as "Buy", NCTY as "Sell". Consensus price targets imply 30.3% upside for TTWO (target: $291) vs -14.0% for EA (target: $173). EA is the only dividend payer here at 0.38% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Sell |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $172.65 | $291.25 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 66 | 56 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.75 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GRVY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). EA leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
GRVY vs EA vs TTWO vs NCTY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GRVY or EA or TTWO or NCTY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gravity Co.
, Ltd. (GRVY) is the stronger pick with 13. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for The9 Limited (NCTY). Gravity Co. , Ltd. (GRVY) offers the better valuation at 8. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO) a "Buy" — based on 56 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GRVY or EA or TTWO or NCTY?
On trailing P/E, Gravity Co.
, Ltd. (GRVY) is the cheapest at 8. 9x versus Electronic Arts Inc. at 57. 2x. On forward P/E, Electronic Arts Inc. is actually cheaper at 23. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GRVY or EA or TTWO or NCTY?
Over the past 5 years, Electronic Arts Inc.
(EA) delivered a total return of +43. 6%, compared to -96. 8% for The9 Limited (NCTY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GRVY returned +30. 2% versus NCTY's -99. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GRVY or EA or TTWO or NCTY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Electronic Arts Inc.
(EA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 18β versus The9 Limited's 2. 56β — meaning NCTY is approximately 1285% more volatile than EA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 192% for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GRVY or EA or TTWO or NCTY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gravity Co.
, Ltd. (GRVY) is pulling ahead at 13. 4% versus -7. 4% for The9 Limited (NCTY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. grew EPS -16. 2% year-over-year, compared to -225. 0% for The9 Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTWO leads at 17. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GRVY or EA or TTWO or NCTY?
Gravity Co.
, Ltd. (GRVY) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 0% net margin versus -373. 0% for The9 Limited — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EA leads at 15. 4% versus -229. 6% for NCTY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EA leads at 79. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GRVY or EA or TTWO or NCTY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Electronic Arts Inc.
(EA) trades at 23. 4x forward P/E versus 57. 3x for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. — 33. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TTWO: 30. 3% to $291. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — GRVY or EA or TTWO or NCTY?
In this comparison, EA (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. GRVY, TTWO, NCTY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GRVY or EA or TTWO or NCTY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Electronic Arts Inc.
(EA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 18), +217. 6% 10Y return). The9 Limited (NCTY) carries a higher beta of 2. 56 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EA: +217. 6%, NCTY: -99. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GRVY and EA and TTWO and NCTY?
These companies operate in different sectors (GRVY (Technology) and EA (Communication Services) and TTWO (Technology) and NCTY (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GRVY is a small-cap deep-value stock; EA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TTWO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NCTY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.