GSIW
Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares
Financial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$457M
5Y Perf.-98.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
GSIW vs TIGR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A
Financial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$628M
5Y Perf.+45.5%
GSIW vs TIGR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | GSIW | TIGR |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $457M | $628M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5M | $392M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $118M |
| Gross Margin | 4.7% | 65.0% |
| Operating Margin | -80.0% | 35.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.8x |
| Total Debt | $199K | $180M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $625K | $394M |
GSIW vs TIGR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
GSIW
TIGR
| Stock | Dec 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Garden Stage Limite… (GSIW) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
| UP Fintech Holding … (TIGR) | 100 | 145.5 | +45.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GSIW vs TIGR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TIGR leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GSIW
Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares
The Banking Pick
GSIW is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 296.0%, EPS growth 3.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.04, Low D/E 3.0%, current ratio 1.51x
- 296.0% NII/revenue growth vs TIGR's 43.7%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A
The Banking Pick
TIGR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 2.02
- -39.9% 10Y total return vs GSIW's -98.6%
- Beta 2.02, current ratio 1.14x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GSIW | 296.0% NII/revenue growth vs TIGR's 43.7% |
| Value | TIGR | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | TIGR | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs GSIW's 0.8% (lower = leaner) |
| Stability / Safety | TIGR | Beta 2.02 vs GSIW's 2.04 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TIGR | -29.9% vs GSIW's -64.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TIGR | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs GSIW's 0.8% |
GSIW vs TIGR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
GSIW vs TIGR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTIGRLAGGINGGSIW
GSIWGarden Stage Limited …
0leads
TIGRUP Fintech Holding Lt…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs GSIWMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
TIGR5/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TIGR2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TIGR5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
TIGR2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TIGR leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TIGR is the larger business by revenue, generating $392M annually — 72.5x GSIW's $5M. TIGR is the more profitable business, keeping 15.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GSIW's -79.9%.
| Metric | GSIWGarden Stage Limi… | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5M | $392M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $225M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | $118M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13M | $673M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +65.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -80.0% | +35.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -79.9% | +15.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -25.3% | +2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.7% | +12.4% |
TIGR leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
TIGR leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | GSIWGarden Stage Limi… | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $457M | $628M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $456M | $414M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -104.39x | 17.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 2.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 84.53x | 1.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 68.14x | 1.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 0.76x |
TIGR leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — GSIW and TIGR each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GSIW delivers a 14.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $18 for TIGR. GSIW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TIGR's 0.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TIGR scores 6/9 vs GSIW's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | GSIWGarden Stage Limi… | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.9% | +17.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.6% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -39.3% | +13.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -53.1% | +18.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$425,481 | -$214M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $624,583 | $394M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $199,102 | $180M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.26x |
Evenly matched — GSIW and TIGR each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TIGR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TIGR five years ago would be worth $3,769 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $143 for GSIW. Over the past 12 months, TIGR leads with a -29.9% total return vs GSIW's -64.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TIGR at 30.4% vs GSIW's -75.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | GSIWGarden Stage Limi… | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.1% | -38.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -64.8% | -29.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +121.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | -62.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | -39.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -75.7% | +30.4% |
TIGR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TIGR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TIGR is the less volatile stock with a 2.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GSIW's 2.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TIGR currently trades 47.5% from its 52-week high vs GSIW's 8.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | GSIWGarden Stage Limi… | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.04x | 2.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $358.00 | $13.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.15 | $5.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +8.2% | +47.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.4 | 52.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 62K | 2.3M |
TIGR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | GSIWGarden Stage Limi… | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Sell |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $4.73 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
TIGR leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
Best OverallUP Fintech Holding Ltd. Spo… (TIGR)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
GSIW vs TIGR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GSIW or TIGR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW) is the stronger pick with 296.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 43. 7% for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR). UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) offers the better valuation at 17. 9x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) a "Sell" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GSIW or TIGR?
Over the past 5 years, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) delivered a total return of -62. 3%, compared to -98. 6% for Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TIGR returned -39. 9% versus GSIW's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GSIW or TIGR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 02β versus Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares's 2. 04β — meaning GSIW is approximately 1% more volatile than TIGR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 27% for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GSIW or TIGR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW) is pulling ahead at 296.
0% versus 43. 7% for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A grew EPS 71. 4% year-over-year, compared to 3. 4% for Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GSIW or TIGR?
UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus -79. 9% for Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TIGR leads at 35. 6% versus -80. 0% for GSIW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TIGR leads at 65. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GSIW or TIGR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is GSIW or TIGR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TIGR: -39. 9%, GSIW: -98. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GSIW and TIGR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(GSIW: 296.0% · TIGR: 43.7%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.