Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GSM vs MP vs LAC vs AA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • GB
Market Cap$741M
5Y Perf.+699.6%
MP
MP Materials Corp.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.28B
5Y Perf.+593.4%
LAC
Lithium Americas Corp.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$1.37B
5Y Perf.+80.3%
AA
Alcoa Corporation

Aluminum

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$16.22B
5Y Perf.+457.2%

GSM vs MP vs LAC vs AA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GSM logoGSM
MP logoMP
LAC logoLAC
AA logoAA
IndustryIndustrial MaterialsIndustrial MaterialsIndustrial MaterialsAluminum
Market Cap$741M$12.28B$1.37B$16.22B
Revenue (TTM)$1.38B$305M$0.00$12.74B
Net Income (TTM)$-111M$-71M$-241M$1.15B
Gross Margin2.8%8.3%13.6%
Operating Margin-12.5%-36.4%7.6%
Forward P/E30.5x274.3x9.0x
Total Debt$293M$1.04B$23M$1M
Cash & Equiv.$123M$1.17B$594M$1.60B

GSM vs MP vs LAC vs AALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GSM
MP
LAC
AA
StockJun 20May 26Return
Ferroglobe PLC (GSM)100799.6+699.6%
MP Materials Corp. (MP)100693.4+593.4%
Lithium Americas Co… (LAC)100180.3+80.3%
Alcoa Corporation (AA)100557.2+457.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GSM vs MP vs LAC vs AA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MP and AA are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Alcoa Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. GSM also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC
The Income Pick

GSM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.43, yield 1.4%
  • Beta 1.43, yield 1.4%, current ratio 1.66x
  • 1.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AA's 0.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
MP
MP Materials Corp.
The Growth Play

MP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 35.1%, EPS growth 12.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -19.5%
  • 5.9% 10Y total return vs AA's 203.5%
  • 35.1% revenue growth vs LAC's -6.0%
  • Beta 1.40 vs AA's 1.77
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
LAC
Lithium Americas Corp.
The Defensive Pick

LAC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.42, Low D/E 2.4%, current ratio 10.33x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
AA
Alcoa Corporation
The Value Play

AA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.

  • Better valuation composite
  • 9.0% margin vs MP's -23.3%
  • 7.1% ROA vs LAC's -16.6%, ROIC 12.7% vs -7.1%
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMP logoMP35.1% revenue growth vs LAC's -6.0%
ValueAA logoAABetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsAA logoAA9.0% margin vs MP's -23.3%
Stability / SafetyMP logoMPBeta 1.40 vs AA's 1.77
DividendsGSM logoGSM1.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AA's 0.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)MP logoMP+192.7% vs GSM's +17.9%
Efficiency (ROA)AA logoAA7.1% ROA vs LAC's -16.6%, ROIC 12.7% vs -7.1%

GSM vs MP vs LAC vs AA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GSMFerroglobe PLC
FY 2025
Silicon Metal Product Line
32.2%$430M
Manganese Alloys Product Line
26.8%$358M
Ferrosilicon Product Line
21.2%$283M
Other Product Lines
9.1%$121M
Other Silicon Based Alloys Product Line
8.7%$116M
Silica Fume Product Line
2.1%$28M
MPMP Materials Corp.
FY 2024
Materials Segment
100.0%$204M
LACLithium Americas Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

AAAlcoa Corporation
FY 2024
Aluminum
51.1%$7.2B
Alumina
48.9%$6.9B

GSM vs MP vs LAC vs AA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLGSMLAGGINGLAC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

AA and LAC operate at a comparable scale, with $12.7B and $0 in trailing revenue. AA is the more profitable business, keeping 9.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MP's -23.3%. On growth, MP holds the edge at +49.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGSM logoGSMFerroglobe PLCMP logoMPMP Materials Corp.LAC logoLACLithium Americas …AA logoAAAlcoa Corporation
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.4B$305M$0$12.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$104M-$43M-$32M$1.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$111M-$71M-$241M$1.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$39M-$314M-$648M$567M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+2.8%+8.3%+13.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-12.5%-36.4%+7.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-8.1%-23.3%+9.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.8%-102.8%+4.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+13.2%+49.1%-13.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+89.6%+121.4%-21.4%+11.8%
AA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

GSM leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricGSM logoGSMFerroglobe PLCMP logoMPMP Materials Corp.LAC logoLACLithium Americas …AA logoAAAlcoa Corporation
Market CapShares × price$741M$12.3B$1.4B$16.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$911M$12.2B$801M$14.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-4.36x-138.26x-26.95x14.11x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.30.50x274.33x8.98x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.17x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.55x44.59x1.27x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.08x4.92x1.20x2.66x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF28.60x
GSM leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AA leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

AA delivers a 18.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-27 for LAC. AA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MP's 0.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AA scores 7/9 vs LAC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricGSM logoGSMFerroglobe PLCMP logoMPMP Materials Corp.LAC logoLACLithium Americas …AA logoAAAlcoa Corporation
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-15.0%-3.7%-26.9%+18.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-7.2%-2.0%-16.6%+7.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-16.9%-4.7%-7.1%+12.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-19.8%-4.2%-3.9%+8.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93427
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.42x0.44x0.02x0.00x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$170M-$123M-$571M-$1.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$123M$1.2B$594M$1.6B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$293M$1.0B$23M$1M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-7.47x-2.80x7.85x
AA leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MP five years ago would be worth $24,966 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,869 for LAC. Over the past 12 months, MP leads with a +192.7% total return vs GSM's +17.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MP at 47.6% vs LAC's -23.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGSM logoGSMFerroglobe PLCMP logoMPMP Materials Corp.LAC logoLACLithium Americas …AA logoAAAlcoa Corporation
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-13.3%+25.8%+18.7%+10.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+17.9%+192.7%+84.4%+158.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-1.0%+221.7%-55.6%+73.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-9.0%+149.7%-31.3%+56.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-54.4%+591.3%+234.9%+203.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-0.3%+47.6%-23.7%+20.1%
MP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MP and AA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MP is the less volatile stock with a 1.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AA's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AA currently trades 82.7% from its 52-week high vs LAC's 53.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGSM logoGSMFerroglobe PLCMP logoMPMP Materials Corp.LAC logoLACLithium Americas …AA logoAAAlcoa Corporation
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.43x1.40x1.42x1.77x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.74$100.25$10.52$75.70
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.04$18.64$2.47$24.15
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+69.1%+69.0%+53.8%+82.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10057.666.869.144.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.2M5.6M9.0M5.4M
Evenly matched — MP and AA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

GSM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: GSM as "Buy", MP as "Buy", LAC as "Hold", AA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.7% upside for LAC (target: $7) vs 9.9% for AA (target: $69). For income investors, GSM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.40% vs AA's 0.63%.

MetricGSM logoGSMFerroglobe PLCMP logoMPMP Materials Corp.LAC logoLACLithium Americas …AA logoAAAlcoa Corporation
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$78.25$7.00$68.80
# AnalystsCovering analysts11111542
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.4%+0.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.06$0.39
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%
GSM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

AA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GSM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallFerroglobe PLC (GSM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GSM vs MP vs LAC vs AA: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GSM or MP or LAC or AA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, MP Materials Corp.

(MP) is the stronger pick with 35. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 8% for Ferroglobe PLC (GSM). Alcoa Corporation (AA) offers the better valuation at 14. 1x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GSM or MP or LAC or AA?

On forward P/E, Alcoa Corporation is actually cheaper at 9.

0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GSM or MP or LAC or AA?

Over the past 5 years, MP Materials Corp.

(MP) delivered a total return of +149. 7%, compared to -31. 3% for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MP returned +591. 3% versus GSM's -54. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GSM or MP or LAC or AA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MP Materials Corp.

(MP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 40β versus Alcoa Corporation's 1. 77β — meaning AA is approximately 27% more volatile than MP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alcoa Corporation (AA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 44% for MP Materials Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GSM or MP or LAC or AA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MP Materials Corp.

(MP) is pulling ahead at 35. 1% versus -18. 8% for Ferroglobe PLC (GSM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alcoa Corporation grew EPS 1486% year-over-year, compared to -31. 3% for Ferroglobe PLC. Over a 3-year CAGR, AA leads at -0. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GSM or MP or LAC or AA?

Alcoa Corporation (AA) is the more profitable company, earning 9.

0% net margin versus -31. 2% for MP Materials Corp. — meaning it keeps 9. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AA leads at 7. 6% versus -44. 6% for MP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AA leads at 13. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GSM or MP or LAC or AA more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Alcoa Corporation (AA) trades at 9.

0x forward P/E versus 274. 3x for MP Materials Corp. — 265. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LAC: 23. 7% to $7. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GSM or MP or LAC or AA?

In this comparison, GSM (1.

4% yield), AA (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. MP, LAC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is GSM or MP or LAC or AA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.

4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GSM: -54. 4%, LAC: +234. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GSM and MP and LAC and AA?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GSM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AA is a mid-cap deep-value stock. GSM, AA pay a dividend while MP, LAC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GSM

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LAC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AA

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GSM and MP and LAC and AA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GSM: 13.2% · MP: 49.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.