Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GTE vs PARR vs DKL vs EGY vs MPLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Midstream
GTE vs PARR vs DKL vs EGY vs MPLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $323M | $3.18B | $2.71B | $584M | $54.82B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $426M | $7.54B | $1.06B | $281M | $12.54B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-174M | $454M | $170M | $-143M | $4.71B |
| Gross Margin | 6.7% | 19.5% | 19.2% | 27.2% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | -5.5% | 8.2% | 16.5% | 1.5% | 44.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 5.7x | 14.6x | 21.3x | 12.3x |
| Total Debt | $725M | $1.39B | $35M | $128M | $26.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $83M | $164M | $11M | $59M | $2.14B |
GTE vs PARR vs DKL vs EGY vs MPLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gran Tierra Energy … (GTE) | 100 | 384.1 | +284.1% |
| Par Pacific Holding… (PARR) | 100 | 692.9 | +592.9% |
| Delek Logistics Par… (DKL) | 100 | 214.4 | +114.4% |
| VAALCO Energy, Inc. (EGY) | 100 | 564.6 | +464.6% |
| MPLX Lp (MPLX) | 100 | 284.4 | +184.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GTE vs PARR vs DKL vs EGY vs MPLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, GTE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PARR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 267.4% 10Y total return vs EGY's 5.0%
- Lower P/E (5.7x vs 12.3x)
- +267.2% vs MPLX's +18.9%
DKL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 8.7%
- 8.7% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs MPLX's 7.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
EGY is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 29.0%, current ratio 0.69x
- Beta 0.02 vs DKL's 0.34, lower leverage
MPLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 8.4%, EPS growth 14.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.9%
- Beta 0.11, yield 7.3%, current ratio 1.23x
- 8.4% revenue growth vs EGY's -25.0%
- 37.5% margin vs EGY's -50.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.4% revenue growth vs EGY's -25.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.7x vs 12.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.5% margin vs EGY's -50.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs DKL's 0.34, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 8.7% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs MPLX's 7.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +267.2% vs MPLX's +18.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.3% ROA vs EGY's -15.3%, ROIC 9.9% vs 6.8% |
GTE vs PARR vs DKL vs EGY vs MPLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GTE vs PARR vs DKL vs EGY vs MPLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PARR leads in 2 of 6 categories
MPLX leads 1 • GTE leads 1 • DKL leads 1 • EGY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.5B annually — 44.7x EGY's $281M. MPLX is the more profitable business, keeping 37.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EGY's -50.9%. On growth, DKL holds the edge at +19.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $426M | $7.5B | $1.1B | $281M | $12.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $183M | $760M | $310M | $102M | $7.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$174M | $454M | $170M | -$143M | $4.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $89M | $282M | $112M | $51M | $5.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | +19.5% | +19.2% | +27.2% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.5% | +8.2% | +16.5% | +1.5% | +44.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -40.8% | +6.0% | +16.0% | -50.9% | +37.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.0% | +3.7% | +10.6% | +18.2% | +39.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +4.5% | +19.0% | -100.0% | +5.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.3% | +2.9% | -17.8% | -13.2% | -17.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GTE and PARR and EGY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.0x trailing earnings, PARR trades at a 42% valuation discount to DKL's 15.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GTE's 3.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MPLX's 12.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $323M | $3.2B | $2.7B | $584M | $54.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $965M | $4.4B | $2.7B | $653M | $78.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.68x | 8.99x | 15.47x | -14.00x | 11.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 5.66x | 14.60x | 21.33x | 12.33x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.61x | 6.46x | 8.81x | 4.17x | 12.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.54x | 0.43x | 2.68x | 1.63x | 4.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.42x | 2.11x | 447.14x | 1.31x | 3.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.81x | 10.74x | — | — | 13.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PARR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DKL delivers a 19.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-71 for GTE. EGY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DKL's 5.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PARR scores 7/9 vs EGY's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -70.7% | +32.2% | +19.2% | -31.7% | +32.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -14.1% | +11.2% | +6.1% | -15.3% | +11.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.8% | +15.1% | +14.1% | +6.8% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.8% | +18.9% | +8.3% | +6.2% | +12.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.17x | 0.90x | 5.75x | 0.29x | 1.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $642M | $1.2B | $24M | $70M | $24.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $83M | $164M | $11M | $59M | $2.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $725M | $1.4B | $35M | $128M | $26.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.17x | 14.33x | 1.66x | -8.27x | 5.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PARR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PARR five years ago would be worth $46,044 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,440 for GTE. Over the past 12 months, PARR leads with a +267.2% total return vs MPLX's +18.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PARR at 45.4% vs DKL's 13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +116.3% | +79.7% | +13.4% | +54.7% | +4.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +108.0% | +267.2% | +47.9% | +70.1% | +18.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.9% | +207.7% | +45.6% | +49.4% | +92.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.4% | +360.4% | +85.3% | +148.8% | +151.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.1% | +267.4% | +207.4% | +500.2% | +180.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.4% | +45.4% | +13.3% | +14.3% | +24.3% |
Risk & Volatility
GTE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTE is the less volatile stock with a -0.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DKL's 0.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTE currently trades 94.0% from its 52-week high vs EGY's 83.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.16x | -0.11x | 0.34x | 0.02x | 0.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.73 | $70.39 | $55.89 | $6.72 | $59.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.09 | $16.86 | $37.50 | $3.14 | $47.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.0% | +91.4% | +91.3% | +83.3% | +90.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.5 | 49.4 | 49.1 | 47.1 | 51.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 713K | 1.5M | 63K | 1.7M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
DKL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GTE as "Buy", PARR as "Buy", DKL as "Hold", EGY as "Buy", MPLX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 53.0% upside for GTE (target: $14) vs -4.3% for PARR (target: $62). For income investors, DKL offers the higher dividend yield at 8.71% vs EGY's 4.54%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $61.60 | $56.00 | $7.30 | $60.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 17 | 10 | 5 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +8.7% | +4.5% | +7.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $4.45 | $0.25 | $3.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +3.9% | +0.4% | +0.1% | +0.7% |
PARR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). MPLX leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
GTE vs PARR vs DKL vs EGY vs MPLX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GTE or PARR or DKL or EGY or MPLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MPLX Lp (MPLX) is the stronger pick with 8.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 0% for VAALCO Energy, Inc. (EGY). Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. (PARR) offers the better valuation at 9. 0x trailing P/E (5. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gran Tierra Energy Inc. (GTE) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GTE or PARR or DKL or EGY or MPLX?
On trailing P/E, Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.
(PARR) is the cheapest at 9. 0x versus Delek Logistics Partners, LP at 15. 5x. On forward P/E, Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GTE or PARR or DKL or EGY or MPLX?
Over the past 5 years, Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.
(PARR) delivered a total return of +360. 4%, compared to +34. 4% for Gran Tierra Energy Inc. (GTE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EGY returned +500. 2% versus GTE's -66. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GTE or PARR or DKL or EGY or MPLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gran Tierra Energy Inc.
(GTE) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 16β versus Delek Logistics Partners, LP's 0. 34β — meaning DKL is approximately -318% more volatile than GTE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, VAALCO Energy, Inc. (EGY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 6% for Delek Logistics Partners, LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GTE or PARR or DKL or EGY or MPLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MPLX Lp (MPLX) is pulling ahead at 8.
4% versus -25. 0% for VAALCO Energy, Inc. (EGY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 1314% year-over-year, compared to -55. 5% for Gran Tierra Energy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MPLX leads at 3. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GTE or PARR or DKL or EGY or MPLX?
MPLX Lp (MPLX) is the more profitable company, earning 41.
6% net margin versus -32. 4% for Gran Tierra Energy Inc. — meaning it keeps 41. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPLX leads at 40. 3% versus -1. 8% for GTE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MPLX leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GTE or PARR or DKL or EGY or MPLX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.
(PARR) trades at 5. 7x forward P/E versus 21. 3x for VAALCO Energy, Inc. — 15. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GTE: 53. 0% to $14. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GTE or PARR or DKL or EGY or MPLX?
In this comparison, DKL (8.
7% yield), MPLX (7. 3% yield), EGY (4. 5% yield) pay a dividend. GTE, PARR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GTE or PARR or DKL or EGY or MPLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, VAALCO Energy, Inc.
(EGY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 02), 4. 5% yield, +500. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EGY: +500. 2%, GTE: -66. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GTE and PARR and DKL and EGY and MPLX?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GTE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PARR is a small-cap deep-value stock; DKL is a small-cap deep-value stock; EGY is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MPLX is a mid-cap deep-value stock. DKL, EGY, MPLX pay a dividend while GTE, PARR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.