Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GTEC vs ALSN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
GTEC vs ALSN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $11M | $10.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $86M | $3.65B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $543M |
| Gross Margin | 29.2% | 40.8% |
| Operating Margin | 13.1% | 24.1% |
| Forward P/E | 0.6x | 13.6x |
| Total Debt | $21M | $2.92B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $1.50B |
GTEC vs ALSN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Greenland Technolog… (GTEC) | 100 | 29.5 | -70.5% |
| Allison Transmissio… (ALSN) | 100 | 326.3 | +226.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GTEC vs ALSN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GTEC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.98, yield 70.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.98, Low D/E 40.1%, current ratio 1.61x
- PEG 0.05 vs ALSN's 0.60
ALSN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -6.7%, EPS growth -11.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.8%
- 373.8% 10Y total return vs GTEC's -93.6%
- -6.7% revenue growth vs GTEC's -7.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -6.7% revenue growth vs GTEC's -7.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.6x vs 13.6x), PEG 0.05 vs 0.60 | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.4% margin vs ALSN's 14.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.98 vs ALSN's 1.11, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 70.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ALSN's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.7% vs GTEC's -69.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs ALSN's 8.4%, ROIC 13.7% vs 22.2% |
GTEC vs ALSN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GTEC vs ALSN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALSN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALSN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.6B annually — 42.4x GTEC's $86M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 16.4% (GTEC) to 14.9% (ALSN). On growth, ALSN holds the edge at +83.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $86M | $3.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $13M | $970M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $543M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12M | $713M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.2% | +40.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.1% | +24.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | +14.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +19.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.3% | +83.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.6% | -40.4% |
Valuation Metrics
GTEC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.6x trailing earnings, GTEC trades at a 96% valuation discount to ALSN's 16.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GTEC offers better value at 0.05x vs ALSN's 0.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11M | $10.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25M | $11.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.60x | 16.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.05x | 0.73x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.72x | 10.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 3.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.16x | 5.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.81x | 15.77x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GTEC leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALSN delivers a 29.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $20 for GTEC. GTEC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.40x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALSN's 1.56x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.2% | +29.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.4% | +8.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.7% | +22.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.7% | +18.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 1.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $15M | $1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $21M | $2.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 149.50x | 64.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALSN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALSN five years ago would be worth $28,345 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $774 for GTEC. Over the past 12 months, ALSN leads with a +27.7% total return vs GTEC's -69.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALSN at 37.9% vs GTEC's -21.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.8% | +24.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -69.5% | +27.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.0% | +162.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.3% | +183.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.6% | +373.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.7% | +37.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GTEC and ALSN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTEC is the less volatile stock with a 0.98 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALSN's 1.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALSN currently trades 89.6% from its 52-week high vs GTEC's 25.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 1.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.47 | $137.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.58 | $76.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.1% | +89.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 30.3 | 50.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 110K | 814K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GTEC and ALSN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, GTEC offers the higher dividend yield at 70.54% vs ALSN's 0.87%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $116.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +70.5% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.44 | $1.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.2% |
ALSN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). GTEC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
GTEC vs ALSN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GTEC or ALSN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) is the stronger pick with -6. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 1% for Greenland Technologies Holding Corporation (GTEC). Greenland Technologies Holding Corporation (GTEC) offers the better valuation at 0. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN) a "Hold" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GTEC or ALSN?
On trailing P/E, Greenland Technologies Holding Corporation (GTEC) is the cheapest at 0.
6x versus Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. at 16. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GTEC or ALSN?
Over the past 5 years, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) delivered a total return of +183. 5%, compared to -92. 3% for Greenland Technologies Holding Corporation (GTEC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALSN returned +373. 8% versus GTEC's -93. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GTEC or ALSN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Greenland Technologies Holding Corporation (GTEC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
98β versus Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 11β — meaning ALSN is approximately 13% more volatile than GTEC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Greenland Technologies Holding Corporation (GTEC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 40% versus 156% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GTEC or ALSN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) is pulling ahead at -6. 7% versus -7. 1% for Greenland Technologies Holding Corporation (GTEC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Greenland Technologies Holding Corporation grew EPS 185. 8% year-over-year, compared to -11. 8% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALSN leads at 2. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GTEC or ALSN?
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 7% net margin versus 16. 8% for Greenland Technologies Holding Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALSN leads at 32. 3% versus 15. 0% for GTEC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALSN leads at 48. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — GTEC or ALSN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Greenland Technologies Holding Corporation (GTEC) offers the highest yield at 70. 5%, versus 0. 9% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN).
08Is GTEC or ALSN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 11), 0. 9% yield, +373. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALSN: +373. 8%, GTEC: -93. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between GTEC and ALSN?
These companies operate in different sectors (GTEC (Industrials) and ALSN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.