Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GTES vs GT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
GTES vs GT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $6.64B | $1.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.45B | $17.91B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $249M | $-2.08B |
| Gross Margin | 40.1% | 14.7% |
| Operating Margin | 13.9% | 1.6% |
| Forward P/E | 16.0x | 23.7x |
| Total Debt | $2.51B | $7.26B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $812M | $801M |
GTES vs GT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gates Industrial Co… (GTES) | 100 | 259.6 | +159.6% |
| The Goodyear Tire &… (GT) | 100 | 85.5 | -14.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GTES vs GT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GTES carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 1.0%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.1%
- 41.0% 10Y total return vs GT's -69.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.57, Low D/E 68.0%, current ratio 3.37x
GT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.98
- Beta 0.98, current ratio 1.06x
- Beta 0.98 vs GTES's 1.57
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.0% revenue growth vs GT's -3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.0x vs 23.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.2% margin vs GT's -11.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.98 vs GTES's 1.57 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.3% vs GT's -40.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.5% ROA vs GT's -10.5%, ROIC 7.5% vs 4.3% |
GTES vs GT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GTES vs GT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTES leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GT is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.9B annually — 5.2x GTES's $3.4B. GTES is the more profitable business, keeping 7.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GT's -11.6%. On growth, GTES holds the edge at +0.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.4B | $17.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $640M | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $249M | -$2.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $421M | -$126M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.1% | +14.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +1.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.2% | -11.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | -0.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.4% | -8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -3.1% |
Valuation Metrics
GT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GT's 4.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GTES's 11.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.6B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.3B | $8.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.18x | -1.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.02x | 23.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.94x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.24x | 4.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.93x | 0.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.84x | 0.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.40x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GTES leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GTES delivers a 6.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-55 for GT. GTES carries lower financial leverage with a 0.68x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GT's 2.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GTES scores 8/9 vs GT's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.8% | -55.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.5% | -10.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.5% | +4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.5% | +5.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.68x | 2.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | $6.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $812M | $801M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.5B | $7.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.59x | -0.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GTES leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GTES five years ago would be worth $14,815 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,399 for GT. Over the past 12 months, GTES leads with a +26.3% total return vs GT's -40.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GTES at 23.1% vs GT's -17.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.3% | -27.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +26.3% | -40.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.5% | -43.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.2% | -66.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.0% | -69.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.1% | -17.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GTES and GT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GT is the less volatile stock with a 0.98 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GTES's 1.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTES currently trades 91.6% from its 52-week high vs GT's 54.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.57x | 0.98x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.47 | $12.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.34 | $6.14 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.6% | +54.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.1 | 45.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 8.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GTES as "Buy" and GT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 25.3% upside for GT (target: $8) vs 18.2% for GTES (target: $31).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $30.83 | $8.15 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.8% | +0.3% |
GTES leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
GTES vs GT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GTES or GT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gates Industrial Corporation plc (GTES) is the stronger pick with 1.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT). Gates Industrial Corporation plc (GTES) offers the better valuation at 27. 2x trailing P/E (16. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gates Industrial Corporation plc (GTES) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GTES or GT?
On forward P/E, Gates Industrial Corporation plc is actually cheaper at 16.
0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GTES or GT?
Over the past 5 years, Gates Industrial Corporation plc (GTES) delivered a total return of +48.
2%, compared to -66. 0% for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTES returned +41. 0% versus GT's -69. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GTES or GT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
98β versus Gates Industrial Corporation plc's 1. 57β — meaning GTES is approximately 59% more volatile than GT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gates Industrial Corporation plc (GTES) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 68% versus 2% for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GTES or GT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gates Industrial Corporation plc (GTES) is pulling ahead at 1.
0% versus -3. 2% for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gates Industrial Corporation plc grew EPS 29. 7% year-over-year, compared to -26. 0% for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTES leads at -1. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GTES or GT?
Gates Industrial Corporation plc (GTES) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
3% net margin versus -9. 4% for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company — meaning it keeps 7. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GTES leads at 15. 3% versus 3. 6% for GT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GTES leads at 40. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GTES or GT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Gates Industrial Corporation plc (GTES) trades at 16.
0x forward P/E versus 23. 7x for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company — 7. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GT: 25. 3% to $8. 15.
08Which pays a better dividend — GTES or GT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is GTES or GT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
98)). Gates Industrial Corporation plc (GTES) carries a higher beta of 1. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GT: -69. 9%, GTES: +41. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GTES and GT?
These companies operate in different sectors (GTES (Industrials) and GT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare GTES vs ASTE
ASTE is one of the most direct listed alternatives to GTES.
Compare GT vs SRI
SRI overlaps with GT in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With ASTE + WMS
ASTE and WMS are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.