Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GTI vs CSGP vs Z vs SGML vs OPEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Services
Internet Content & Information
Industrial Materials
Real Estate - Services
GTI vs CSGP vs Z vs SGML vs OPEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Real Estate - Services | Internet Content & Information | Industrial Materials | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $963K | $14.83B | $10.57B | $2.63B | $4.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $93K | $3.41B | $2.69B | $160M | $3.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-16M | $25M | $61M | $-37M | $-1.39B |
| Gross Margin | -108.0% | 77.4% | 73.3% | 16.9% | 7.9% |
| Operating Margin | -242.8% | -0.8% | 0.4% | -12.2% | -9.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 25.8x | 19.7x | 26.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $17K | $1.14B | $536M | $254M | $193M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7K | $1.73B | $773M | $66M | $962M |
GTI vs CSGP vs Z vs SGML vs OPEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Graphjet Technology (GTI) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) | 100 | 95.8 | -4.2% |
| Zillow Group, Inc. … (Z) | 100 | 135.1 | +35.1% |
| Sigma Lithium Corpo… (SGML) | 100 | 137.0 | +37.0% |
| Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN) | 100 | 58.7 | -41.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GTI vs CSGP vs Z vs SGML vs OPEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GTI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 20.3% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2%
CSGP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.80
- Rev growth 18.7%, EPS growth -95.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.2%
- Beta 0.80, current ratio 2.84x
- Beta 0.80 vs OPEN's 3.09, lower leverage
Z carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.32, Low D/E 11.0%, current ratio 3.13x
- Lower P/E (19.7x vs 26.7x)
- 2.3% margin vs GTI's -176.9%
- 1.1% ROA vs GTI's -374.9%
SGML is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 14.9% 10Y total return vs CSGP's 77.5%
OPEN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +5.1% vs GTI's -95.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.3% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.7x vs 26.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.3% margin vs GTI's -176.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs OPEN's 3.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.1% vs GTI's -95.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.1% ROA vs GTI's -374.9% |
GTI vs CSGP vs Z vs SGML vs OPEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
GTI vs CSGP vs Z vs SGML vs OPEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
Z leads in 2 of 6 categories
GTI leads 0 • CSGP leads 0 • SGML leads 0 • OPEN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Z leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OPEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.9B annually — 42446.3x GTI's $92,776. Z is the more profitable business, keeping 2.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GTI's -176.9%. On growth, SGML holds the edge at +36.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $92,776 | $3.4B | $2.7B | $160M | $3.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$22M | $278M | $221M | -$10M | -$363M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$16M | $25M | $61M | -$37M | -$1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$660,998 | $241M | $433M | -$32M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -108.0% | +77.4% | +73.3% | +16.9% | +7.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -242.8% | -0.8% | +0.4% | -12.2% | -9.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -176.9% | +0.7% | +2.3% | -23.3% | -35.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.1% | +7.1% | +16.1% | -20.1% | +27.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +22.5% | +18.4% | +36.6% | -37.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.1% | +127.7% | +5.1% | +67.7% | -50.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — Z and OPEN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 482.7x trailing earnings, Z trades at a 77% valuation discount to CSGP's 2107.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, Z's 39.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SGML's 295.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $963,019 | $14.8B | $10.6B | $2.6B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $972,640 | $14.2B | $10.3B | $2.8B | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.05x | 2107.23x | 482.65x | -51.22x | -3.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.84x | 19.71x | 26.67x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 83.74x | 39.58x | 295.90x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.38x | 4.57x | 4.09x | 17.22x | 0.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.77x | 2.27x | 27.03x | 4.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 361.59x | 44.97x | — | 3.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Z leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Z delivers a 1.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-163 for OPEN. Z carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SGML's 1.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), Z scores 7/9 vs SGML's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +0.3% | +1.3% | -44.6% | -163.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.7% | +0.2% | +1.1% | -10.9% | -53.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -0.9% | -0.5% | -1.4% | -15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -0.8% | -0.6% | -1.8% | -11.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.14x | 0.11x | 1.91x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9,621 | -$589M | -$237M | $188M | -$769M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7,354 | $1.7B | $773M | $66M | $962M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16,975 | $1.1B | $536M | $254M | $193M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -29.62x | 1.58x | 5.22x | -1.14x | -8.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SGML and OPEN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SGML five years ago would be worth $54,136 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for GTI. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +510.1% total return vs GTI's -95.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OPEN at 37.4% vs GTI's -92.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -57.7% | -46.7% | -33.7% | +66.4% | -12.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -95.2% | -53.6% | -35.7% | +236.4% | +510.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -52.9% | -9.5% | -37.3% | +159.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -58.9% | -63.2% | +441.4% | -71.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +77.5% | +64.9% | +1494.7% | -50.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -92.2% | -22.2% | -3.3% | -14.4% | +37.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CSGP and SGML each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CSGP is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SGML currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs GTI's 2.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.64x | 0.80x | 1.32x | 1.61x | 3.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.89 | $97.43 | $93.88 | $24.48 | $10.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.21 | $33.31 | $39.05 | $4.25 | $0.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.0% | +35.9% | +46.5% | +96.6% | +48.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 27.5 | 30.4 | 51.1 | 71.6 | 56.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 5.9M | 3.6M | 3.7M | 36.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CSGP as "Buy", Z as "Hold", SGML as "Buy", OPEN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 83.2% upside for Z (target: $80) vs -23.9% for SGML (target: $18).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $61.91 | $80.00 | $18.00 | $6.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 25 | 46 | 3 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.9% | +6.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Z leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
GTI vs CSGP vs Z vs SGML vs OPEN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GTI or CSGP or Z or SGML or OPEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is the stronger pick with 18. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z) offers the better valuation at 482. 7x trailing P/E (19. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GTI or CSGP or Z or SGML or OPEN?
On trailing P/E, Zillow Group, Inc.
Class C (Z) is the cheapest at 482. 7x versus CoStar Group, Inc. at 2107. 2x. On forward P/E, Zillow Group, Inc. Class C is actually cheaper at 19. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GTI or CSGP or Z or SGML or OPEN?
Over the past 5 years, Sigma Lithium Corporation (SGML) delivered a total return of +441.
4%, compared to -99. 9% for Graphjet Technology (GTI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SGML returned +1495% versus GTI's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GTI or CSGP or Z or SGML or OPEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 80β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning OPEN is approximately 288% more volatile than CSGP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 191% for Sigma Lithium Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GTI or CSGP or Z or SGML or OPEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is pulling ahead at 18. 7% versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Zillow Group, Inc. Class C grew EPS 118. 9% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CSGP leads at 14. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GTI or CSGP or Z or SGML or OPEN?
Zillow Group, Inc.
Class C (Z) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 9% net margin versus -176. 9% for Graphjet Technology — meaning it keeps 0. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: Z leads at -1. 2% versus -242. 8% for GTI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSGP leads at 75. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GTI or CSGP or Z or SGML or OPEN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Zillow Group, Inc.
Class C (Z) trades at 19. 7x forward P/E versus 26. 7x for Sigma Lithium Corporation — 7. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for Z: 83. 2% to $80. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GTI or CSGP or Z or SGML or OPEN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is GTI or CSGP or Z or SGML or OPEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sigma Lithium Corporation (SGML) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1495% 10Y return).
Graphjet Technology (GTI) carries a higher beta of 2. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SGML: +1495%, GTI: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GTI and CSGP and Z and SGML and OPEN?
These companies operate in different sectors (GTI (Basic Materials) and CSGP (Real Estate) and Z (Communication Services) and SGML (Basic Materials) and OPEN (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GTI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CSGP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; Z is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SGML is a small-cap high-growth stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 9%
- Gross Margin > 44%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.