GTIM vs ARKR

For growth investors, Good Times Restaurants Inc.

(GTIM) is the stronger pick with -0. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 7% for Ark Restaurants Corp. (ARKR). Good Times Restaurants Inc. (GTIM) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Ark Restaurants Corp.

(ARKR) delivered a total return of -55. 9%, compared to -73. 6% for Good Times Restaurants Inc. (GTIM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARKR returned -36. 1% versus GTIM's -63. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ark Restaurants Corp.

(ARKR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 42β versus Good Times Restaurants Inc. 's 0. 50β — meaning GTIM is approximately -219% more volatile than ARKR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Good Times Restaurants Inc. (GTIM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 124% versus 3% for Ark Restaurants Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Good Times Restaurants Inc.

(GTIM) is pulling ahead at -0. 5% versus -9. 7% for Ark Restaurants Corp. (ARKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Good Times Restaurants Inc. grew EPS -31. 6% year-over-year, compared to -194. 4% for Ark Restaurants Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARKR leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Good Times Restaurants Inc.

(GTIM) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 7% net margin versus -6. 9% for Ark Restaurants Corp. — meaning it keeps 0. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GTIM leads at 0. 2% versus -2. 5% for ARKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARKR leads at 35. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Ark Restaurants Corp.

(ARKR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 42)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARKR: -36. 1%, GTIM: -63. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GTIM is a small-cap deep-value stock; ARKR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.