GTIM vs ARKR vs DENN vs NATH

For growth investors, Nathan's Famous, Inc.

(NATH) is the stronger pick with 6. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 7% for Ark Restaurants Corp. (ARKR). Good Times Restaurants Inc. (GTIM) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Denny's Corporation (DENN) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Good Times Restaurants Inc.

(GTIM) is the cheapest at 13. 4x versus Nathan's Famous, Inc. at 17. 3x.

Over the past 5 years, Nathan's Famous, Inc.

(NATH) delivered a total return of +72. 1%, compared to -73. 6% for Good Times Restaurants Inc. (GTIM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NATH returned +163. 4% versus GTIM's -64. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ark Restaurants Corp.

(ARKR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 40β versus Denny's Corporation's 0. 65β — meaning DENN is approximately -261% more volatile than ARKR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Good Times Restaurants Inc. (GTIM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 124% versus 3% for Ark Restaurants Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nathan's Famous, Inc.

(NATH) is pulling ahead at 6. 9% versus -9. 7% for Ark Restaurants Corp. (ARKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nathan's Famous, Inc. grew EPS 22. 3% year-over-year, compared to -194. 4% for Ark Restaurants Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARKR leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Nathan's Famous, Inc.

(NATH) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 2% net margin versus -6. 9% for Ark Restaurants Corp. — meaning it keeps 16. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NATH leads at 24. 6% versus -2. 5% for ARKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DENN leads at 73. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, NATH (2.

0% yield) pays a dividend. GTIM, ARKR, DENN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Ark Restaurants Corp.

(ARKR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 40)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARKR: -38. 1%, DENN: -42. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GTIM is a small-cap deep-value stock; ARKR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DENN is a small-cap deep-value stock; NATH is a small-cap deep-value stock. NATH pays a dividend while GTIM, ARKR, DENN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.