Restaurants
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GTIM vs ARKR vs DENN vs NATH vs SHAK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
GTIM vs ARKR vs DENN vs NATH vs SHAK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $13M | $25M | $322M | $952M | $2.82B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $138M | $162M | $457M | $158M | $1.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $-14M | $10M | $21M | $41M |
| Gross Margin | 9.9% | 6.9% | 43.8% | 29.4% | 7.5% |
| Operating Margin | 0.4% | -0.5% | 8.4% | 20.1% | 4.3% |
| Forward P/E | 13.2x | — | 15.0x | 17.3x | 54.4x |
| Total Debt | $42M | $86M | $408M | $56M | $902M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $11M | $2M | $28M | $360M |
GTIM vs ARKR vs DENN vs NATH vs SHAK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good Times Restaura… (GTIM) | 100 | 108.6 | +8.6% |
| Ark Restaurants Cor… (ARKR) | 100 | 57.1 | -42.9% |
| Denny's Corporation (DENN) | 100 | 57.4 | -42.6% |
| Nathan's Famous, In… (NATH) | 100 | 181.0 | +81.0% |
| Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK) | 100 | 126.3 | +26.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GTIM vs ARKR vs DENN vs NATH vs SHAK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GTIM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.53
- Lower P/E (13.2x vs 54.4x)
Among these 5 stocks, ARKR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
DENN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +43.3% vs ARKR's -37.3%
NATH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 163.4% 10Y total return vs SHAK's 100.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, current ratio 2.69x
- Beta 0.52, yield 2.0%, current ratio 2.69x
- 13.6% margin vs ARKR's -8.5%
SHAK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 15.4%, EPS growth 354.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.1%
- 15.4% revenue growth vs ARKR's -9.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.4% revenue growth vs ARKR's -9.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.2x vs 54.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.6% margin vs ARKR's -8.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs SHAK's 1.81 | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.3% vs ARKR's -37.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 42.1% ROA vs ARKR's -10.5%, ROIC 227.7% vs -2.6% |
GTIM vs ARKR vs DENN vs NATH vs SHAK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GTIM vs ARKR vs DENN vs NATH vs SHAK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NATH leads in 3 of 6 categories
GTIM leads 1 • ARKR leads 0 • DENN leads 0 • SHAK leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NATH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHAK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 10.8x GTIM's $138M. NATH is the more profitable business, keeping 13.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARKR's -8.5%. On growth, SHAK holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $138M | $162M | $457M | $158M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $2M | $55M | $33M | $173M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | -$14M | $10M | $21M | $41M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | -$1M | $2M | $22M | $37M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +6.9% | +43.8% | +29.4% | +7.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | -0.5% | +8.4% | +20.1% | +4.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | -8.5% | +2.2% | +13.6% | +2.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | -0.9% | +0.5% | +14.0% | +2.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.0% | -9.4% | +1.3% | +8.9% | +14.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.8% | -71.6% | -89.9% | -31.8% | -110.0% |
Valuation Metrics
GTIM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.2x trailing earnings, GTIM trades at a 80% valuation discount to SHAK's 64.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GTIM's 12.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NATH's 26.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13M | $25M | $322M | $952M | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $53M | $100M | $728M | $980M | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.17x | -2.20x | 15.24x | 17.27x | 64.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 15.02x | — | 54.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.33x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.00x | — | 12.10x | 26.16x | 17.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.09x | 0.15x | 0.71x | 6.42x | 1.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.40x | 0.79x | — | — | 5.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 350.62x | 38.04x | 49.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NATH leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SHAK delivers a 7.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-42 for ARKR. GTIM carries lower financial leverage with a 1.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARKR's 2.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DENN scores 7/9 vs ARKR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.1% | -41.5% | — | — | +7.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | -10.5% | +2.0% | +42.1% | +2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.3% | -2.6% | +9.7% | +2.3% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.5% | -3.4% | +11.9% | +104.3% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.24x | 2.67x | — | — | 1.63x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $39M | $74M | $406M | $28M | $542M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $11M | $2M | $28M | $360M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $42M | $86M | $408M | $56M | $902M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.75x | -21.75x | 1.73x | 11.11x | 16.87x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NATH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NATH five years ago would be worth $16,954 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,844 for GTIM. Over the past 12 months, DENN leads with a +43.3% total return vs ARKR's -37.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NATH at 14.6% vs ARKR's -23.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.0% | +5.9% | +0.6% | +10.8% | -16.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -36.0% | -37.3% | +43.3% | +3.8% | -32.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.0% | -54.7% | -41.3% | +50.4% | +4.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.6% | -57.5% | -63.5% | +69.5% | -21.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.3% | -38.1% | -42.9% | +163.4% | +100.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.2% | -23.2% | -16.3% | +14.6% | +1.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ARKR and DENN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARKR is the less volatile stock with a -0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHAK's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DENN currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs SHAK's 48.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.53x | -0.40x | 0.65x | 0.52x | 1.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.09 | $12.60 | $6.26 | $118.50 | $144.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.10 | $5.98 | $3.36 | $88.67 | $67.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.3% | +55.6% | +99.8% | +85.6% | +48.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.4 | 55.9 | 66.9 | 59.2 | 23.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 26K | 5K | 0 | 24K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DENN as "Buy", SHAK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 49.1% upside for SHAK (target: $105) vs 12.0% for DENN (target: $7). NATH is the only dividend payer here at 1.97% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $7.00 | — | $104.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 21 | — | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +2.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $2.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.9% | 0.0% | +3.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NATH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GTIM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
GTIM vs ARKR vs DENN vs NATH vs SHAK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GTIM or ARKR or DENN or NATH or SHAK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shake Shack Inc.
(SHAK) is the stronger pick with 15. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 7% for Ark Restaurants Corp. (ARKR). Good Times Restaurants Inc. (GTIM) offers the better valuation at 13. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Denny's Corporation (DENN) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GTIM or ARKR or DENN or NATH or SHAK?
On trailing P/E, Good Times Restaurants Inc.
(GTIM) is the cheapest at 13. 2x versus Shake Shack Inc. at 64. 3x. On forward P/E, Denny's Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GTIM or ARKR or DENN or NATH or SHAK?
Over the past 5 years, Nathan's Famous, Inc.
(NATH) delivered a total return of +69. 5%, compared to -71. 6% for Good Times Restaurants Inc. (GTIM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NATH returned +163. 4% versus GTIM's -64. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GTIM or ARKR or DENN or NATH or SHAK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ark Restaurants Corp.
(ARKR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 40β versus Shake Shack Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning SHAK is approximately -547% more volatile than ARKR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Good Times Restaurants Inc. (GTIM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 124% versus 3% for Ark Restaurants Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GTIM or ARKR or DENN or NATH or SHAK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shake Shack Inc.
(SHAK) is pulling ahead at 15. 4% versus -9. 7% for Ark Restaurants Corp. (ARKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Shake Shack Inc. grew EPS 354. 2% year-over-year, compared to -194. 4% for Ark Restaurants Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHAK leads at 17. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GTIM or ARKR or DENN or NATH or SHAK?
Nathan's Famous, Inc.
(NATH) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 2% net margin versus -6. 9% for Ark Restaurants Corp. — meaning it keeps 16. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NATH leads at 24. 6% versus -2. 5% for ARKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DENN leads at 73. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GTIM or ARKR or DENN or NATH or SHAK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Denny's Corporation (DENN) trades at 15.
0x forward P/E versus 54. 4x for Shake Shack Inc. — 39. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHAK: 49. 1% to $104. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — GTIM or ARKR or DENN or NATH or SHAK?
In this comparison, NATH (2.
0% yield) pays a dividend. GTIM, ARKR, DENN, SHAK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GTIM or ARKR or DENN or NATH or SHAK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ark Restaurants Corp.
(ARKR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 40)). Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARKR: -38. 1%, SHAK: +100. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GTIM and ARKR and DENN and NATH and SHAK?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GTIM is a small-cap deep-value stock; ARKR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DENN is a small-cap deep-value stock; NATH is a small-cap deep-value stock; SHAK is a small-cap high-growth stock. NATH pays a dividend while GTIM, ARKR, DENN, SHAK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.