Broadcasting
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GTN vs WBD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
GTN vs WBD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Broadcasting | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $412M | $67.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.08B | $37.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-76M | $-2.15B |
| Gross Margin | 115.0% | 41.5% |
| Operating Margin | 12.4% | -4.0% |
| Forward P/E | 1.8x | 93.5x |
| Total Debt | $5.81B | $32.57B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $368M | $4.57B |
GTN vs WBD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gray Media, Inc. (GTN) | 100 | 31.8 | -68.2% |
| Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD) | 100 | 124.7 | +24.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GTN vs WBD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GTN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.54, yield 7.7%
- Lower P/E (1.8x vs 93.5x)
- -2.5% margin vs WBD's -5.8%
WBD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -5.1%, EPS growth 106.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.3%
- -3.7% 10Y total return vs GTN's -50.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 87.6%, current ratio 1.06x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -5.1% revenue growth vs GTN's -15.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.8x vs 93.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -2.5% margin vs WBD's -5.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs GTN's 1.54, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.7% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +216.8% vs GTN's +27.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.7% ROA vs WBD's -2.2%, ROIC 3.5% vs 1.5% |
GTN vs WBD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GTN vs WBD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WBD is the larger business by revenue, generating $37.2B annually — 12.1x GTN's $3.1B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -2.5% (GTN) to -5.8% (WBD).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.1B | $37.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $932M | $7.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$76M | -$2.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$74M | $2.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +115.0% | +41.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | -4.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | -5.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +6.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.8% | -1.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +98.5% | -5.5% |
Valuation Metrics
GTN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GTN's 9.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WBD's 13.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $412M | $68.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.9B | $96.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.03x | 93.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.81x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.31x | 13.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 1.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.15x | 1.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.27x | 22.02x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GTN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GTN delivers a -2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-6 for WBD. WBD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.88x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GTN's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WBD scores 6/9 vs GTN's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.9% | -5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.7% | -2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.5% | +1.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.07x | 0.88x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.4B | $28.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $368M | $4.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.8B | $32.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.12x | 3.56x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WBD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WBD five years ago would be worth $7,220 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,729 for GTN. Over the past 12 months, WBD leads with a +216.8% total return vs GTN's +27.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WBD at 26.3% vs GTN's -9.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.0% | -4.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.7% | +216.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.1% | +101.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.7% | -27.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.5% | -3.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.6% | +26.3% |
Risk & Volatility
WBD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WBD is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GTN's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WBD currently trades 90.4% from its 52-week high vs GTN's 68.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.54x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.43 | $30.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.50 | $8.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.9% | +90.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.8 | 48.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 22.2M |
Analyst Outlook
GTN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GTN as "Buy" and WBD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 80.6% upside for GTN (target: $8) vs 10.4% for WBD (target: $30). GTN is the only dividend payer here at 7.68% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $29.94 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.34 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GTN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WBD leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
GTN vs WBD: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GTN or WBD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Warner Bros.
Discovery, Inc. (WBD) is the stronger pick with -5. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 1% for Gray Media, Inc. (GTN). Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD) offers the better valuation at 93. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gray Media, Inc. (GTN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GTN or WBD?
Over the past 5 years, Warner Bros.
Discovery, Inc. (WBD) delivered a total return of -27. 8%, compared to -72. 7% for Gray Media, Inc. (GTN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WBD returned -3. 7% versus GTN's -50. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GTN or WBD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Warner Bros.
Discovery, Inc. (WBD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus Gray Media, Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning GTN is approximately 71% more volatile than WBD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 88% versus 2% for Gray Media, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GTN or WBD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Warner Bros.
Discovery, Inc. (WBD) is pulling ahead at -5. 1% versus -15. 1% for Gray Media, Inc. (GTN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. grew EPS 106. 3% year-over-year, compared to -126. 2% for Gray Media, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WBD leads at 3. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GTN or WBD?
Warner Bros.
Discovery, Inc. (WBD) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 9% net margin versus -2. 7% for Gray Media, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GTN leads at 12. 7% versus 3. 5% for WBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GTN leads at 96. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is GTN or WBD more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GTN: 80.
6% to $8. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — GTN or WBD?
In this comparison, GTN (7.
7% yield) pays a dividend. WBD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is GTN or WBD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Warner Bros.
Discovery, Inc. (WBD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90)). Gray Media, Inc. (GTN) carries a higher beta of 1. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WBD: -3. 7%, GTN: -50. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between GTN and WBD?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GTN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WBD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. GTN pays a dividend while WBD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 68%
- Dividend Yield > 3.0%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.