Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GURE vs ASIX vs KRO vs TROX vs CC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GURE
Gulf Resources, Inc.

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$4M
5Y Perf.-91.6%
ASIX
AdvanSix Inc.

Chemicals

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$796M
5Y Perf.+102.8%
KRO
Kronos Worldwide, Inc.

Chemicals - Specialty

NYSE • US
Market Cap$811M
5Y Perf.-27.8%
TROX
Tronox Holdings plc

Chemicals

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.34B
5Y Perf.+26.7%
CC
The Chemours Company

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.36B
5Y Perf.+70.9%

GURE vs ASIX vs KRO vs TROX vs CC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GURE logoGURE
ASIX logoASIX
KRO logoKRO
TROX logoTROX
CC logoCC
IndustryChemicals - SpecialtyChemicalsChemicals - SpecialtyChemicalsChemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$4M$796M$811M$1.34B$3.36B
Revenue (TTM)$14M$1.52B$1.88B$2.92B$5.82B
Net Income (TTM)$-27M$49M$-134M$-359M$-411M
Gross Margin-82.1%10.8%10.1%5.8%15.1%
Operating Margin-116.6%4.2%-3.1%-4.8%-0.8%
Forward P/E15.7x15.5x
Total Debt$9M$381M$577M$3.59B$4.58B
Cash & Equiv.$10M$20M$37M$211M$672M

GURE vs ASIX vs KRO vs TROX vs CCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GURE
ASIX
KRO
TROX
CC
StockMay 20May 26Return
Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE)1008.4-91.6%
AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX)100202.8+102.8%
Kronos Worldwide, I… (KRO)10072.2-27.8%
Tronox Holdings plc (TROX)100126.7+26.7%
The Chemours Company (CC)100170.9+70.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GURE vs ASIX vs KRO vs TROX vs CC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CC leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. AdvanSix Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. GURE and TROX also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GURE
Gulf Resources, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

GURE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 6.1%, current ratio 0.98x
  • Beta 0.52 vs TROX's 2.37, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
ASIX
AdvanSix Inc.
The Income Pick

ASIX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 2.6%
  • Rev growth 0.3%, EPS growth 11.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.9%
  • 3.2% margin vs GURE's -195.8%
  • 2.9% ROA vs GURE's -16.6%, ROIC 4.4% vs -11.2%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
KRO
Kronos Worldwide, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

KRO is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 1.57, yield 2.8%, current ratio 2.70x
Best for: defensive
TROX
Tronox Holdings plc
The Income Pick

TROX is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.

  • 3.6% yield, vs ASIX's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: dividends
CC
The Chemours Company
The Long-Run Compounder

CC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 219.7% 10Y total return vs KRO's 129.0%
  • 0.4% revenue growth vs GURE's -74.5%
  • Better valuation composite
  • +108.8% vs GURE's -40.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCC logoCC0.4% revenue growth vs GURE's -74.5%
ValueCC logoCCBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsASIX logoASIX3.2% margin vs GURE's -195.8%
Stability / SafetyGURE logoGUREBeta 0.52 vs TROX's 2.37, lower leverage
DividendsTROX logoTROX3.6% yield, vs ASIX's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)CC logoCC+108.8% vs GURE's -40.8%
Efficiency (ROA)ASIX logoASIX2.9% ROA vs GURE's -16.6%, ROIC 4.4% vs -11.2%

GURE vs ASIX vs KRO vs TROX vs CC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GUREGulf Resources, Inc.
FY 2023
Natural Gas
100.0%$150,861
Corporate
0.0%$0
Crude Salt
0.0%$0
Chemical Products
0.0%$0
Segment Total
0.0%$0
Bromine
0.0%$0
ASIXAdvanSix Inc.
FY 2025
Chemical Intermediates
39.4%$377M
Nylon Resins
32.3%$310M
Caprolactam
28.3%$271M
KROKronos Worldwide, Inc.
FY 2014
Point Of Destination
100.0%$1.7B
TROXTronox Holdings plc
FY 2025
TiO2
79.3%$2.3B
Product and Service, Other
11.2%$326M
Zircon
9.5%$274M
CCThe Chemours Company
FY 2025
Titanium Technologies
42.2%$2.4B
Thermal And Specialized Solutions
35.9%$2.1B
Advanced Performance Materials
21.9%$1.3B

GURE vs ASIX vs KRO vs TROX vs CC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLASIXLAGGINGTROX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — GURE and ASIX and CC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

CC is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.8B annually — 418.2x GURE's $14M. ASIX is the more profitable business, keeping 3.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GURE's -195.8%.

MetricGURE logoGUREGulf Resources, I…ASIX logoASIXAdvanSix Inc.KRO logoKROKronos Worldwide,…TROX logoTROXTronox Holdings p…CC logoCCThe Chemours Comp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$14M$1.5B$1.9B$2.9B$5.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1M$143M-$9M$166M-$132M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$27M$49M-$134M-$359M-$411M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$498,990$6M$35M-$139M$198M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-82.1%+10.8%+10.1%+5.8%+15.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-116.6%+4.2%-3.1%-4.8%-0.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-195.8%+3.2%-7.1%-12.3%-7.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-3.6%+0.4%+1.9%-4.8%+3.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.5%+9.4%+4.1%+3.0%+1.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+98.1%-8.8%-126.1%+7.1%-6.1%
Evenly matched — GURE and ASIX and CC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, ASIX's 7.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KRO's 40.7x.

MetricGURE logoGUREGulf Resources, I…ASIX logoASIXAdvanSix Inc.KRO logoKROKronos Worldwide,…TROX logoTROXTronox Holdings p…CC logoCCThe Chemours Comp…
Market CapShares × price$4M$796M$811M$1.3B$3.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3M$1.2B$1.4B$4.7B$7.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.07x13.34x-7.34x-2.83x-8.75x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.74x15.55x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate7.10x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.86x40.71x16.80x21.72x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.51x0.52x0.44x0.46x0.58x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.03x0.80x1.08x0.92x13.44x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF124.10x65.93x
CC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ASIX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ASIX delivers a 6.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-163 for CC. GURE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CC's 18.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ASIX scores 6/9 vs TROX's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricGURE logoGUREGulf Resources, I…ASIX logoASIXAdvanSix Inc.KRO logoKROKronos Worldwide,…TROX logoTROXTronox Holdings p…CC logoCCThe Chemours Comp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-19.2%+6.0%-17.0%-30.4%-163.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-16.6%+2.9%-9.4%-7.7%-5.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-11.2%+4.4%-1.9%-0.3%-0.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-11.6%+5.3%-2.2%-0.4%-0.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–926524
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.06x0.47x0.77x2.48x18.27x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$1M$361M$540M$3.4B$3.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$10M$20M$37M$211M$672M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$9M$381M$577M$3.6B$4.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-268.95x7.92x-2.32x-1.16x1.15x
ASIX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — KRO and CC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ASIX five years ago would be worth $8,411 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $537 for GURE. Over the past 12 months, CC leads with a +108.8% total return vs GURE's -40.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KRO at -0.2% vs GURE's -50.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGURE logoGUREGulf Resources, I…ASIX logoASIXAdvanSix Inc.KRO logoKROKronos Worldwide,…TROX logoTROXTronox Holdings p…CC logoCCThe Chemours Comp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-5.7%+40.3%+58.5%+98.1%+83.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-40.8%+8.2%-1.2%+76.9%+108.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.6%-25.6%-0.7%-23.6%-15.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-94.6%-15.9%-43.9%-55.1%-22.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-95.0%+60.6%+129.0%+116.1%+219.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-50.2%-9.4%-0.2%-8.6%-5.5%
Evenly matched — KRO and CC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — GURE and ASIX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

GURE is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TROX's 2.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ASIX currently trades 89.8% from its 52-week high vs GURE's 30.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGURE logoGUREGulf Resources, I…ASIX logoASIXAdvanSix Inc.KRO logoKROKronos Worldwide,…TROX logoTROXTronox Holdings p…CC logoCCThe Chemours Comp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.52x0.81x1.57x2.37x1.92x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$11.83$26.73$7.90$10.59$28.67
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.04$14.10$4.08$2.86$9.13
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+30.5%+89.8%+89.2%+79.4%+78.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10041.060.663.458.548.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded60K453K350K3.1M3.1M
Evenly matched — GURE and ASIX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — GURE and TROX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ASIX as "Buy", KRO as "Hold", TROX as "Buy", CC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -1.2% upside for CC (target: $22) vs -29.1% for KRO (target: $5). For income investors, TROX offers the higher dividend yield at 3.60% vs CC's 2.31%.

MetricGURE logoGUREGulf Resources, I…ASIX logoASIXAdvanSix Inc.KRO logoKROKronos Worldwide,…TROX logoTROXTronox Holdings p…CC logoCCThe Chemours Comp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$22.00$5.00$7.25$22.14
# AnalystsCovering analysts671720
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.6%+2.8%+3.6%+2.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises20000
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.63$0.20$0.30$0.52
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — GURE and TROX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). ASIX leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 4 tied.

Best OverallAdvanSix Inc. (ASIX)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GURE vs ASIX vs KRO vs TROX vs CC: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GURE or ASIX or KRO or TROX or CC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The Chemours Company (CC) is the stronger pick with 0.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -74. 5% for Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE). AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (15. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GURE or ASIX or KRO or TROX or CC?

On forward P/E, The Chemours Company is actually cheaper at 15.

5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GURE or ASIX or KRO or TROX or CC?

Over the past 5 years, AdvanSix Inc.

(ASIX) delivered a total return of -15. 9%, compared to -94. 6% for Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CC returned +219. 7% versus GURE's -95. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GURE or ASIX or KRO or TROX or CC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gulf Resources, Inc.

(GURE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Tronox Holdings plc's 2. 37β — meaning TROX is approximately 356% more volatile than GURE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 18% for The Chemours Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GURE or ASIX or KRO or TROX or CC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Chemours Company (CC) is pulling ahead at 0.

4% versus -74. 5% for Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AdvanSix Inc. grew EPS 11. 1% year-over-year, compared to -890. 0% for Tronox Holdings plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, KRO leads at -1. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GURE or ASIX or KRO or TROX or CC?

AdvanSix Inc.

(ASIX) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 2% net margin versus -769. 3% for Gulf Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ASIX leads at 4. 4% versus -277. 8% for GURE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CC leads at 15. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GURE or ASIX or KRO or TROX or CC more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, The Chemours Company (CC) trades at 15.

5x forward P/E versus 15. 7x for AdvanSix Inc. — 0. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CC: -1. 2% to $22. 14.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GURE or ASIX or KRO or TROX or CC?

In this comparison, TROX (3.

6% yield), KRO (2. 8% yield), ASIX (2. 6% yield), CC (2. 3% yield) pay a dividend. GURE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is GURE or ASIX or KRO or TROX or CC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, AdvanSix Inc.

(ASIX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 2. 6% yield). Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ASIX: +60. 6%, TROX: +116. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GURE and ASIX and KRO and TROX and CC?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GURE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ASIX is a small-cap deep-value stock; KRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TROX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ASIX, KRO, TROX, CC pay a dividend while GURE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GURE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 125%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ASIX

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KRO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TROX

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 1.4%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 0.9%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GURE and ASIX and KRO and TROX and CC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GURE: 250.1% · ASIX: 9.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.