HAE vs ISRG

For growth investors, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

(ISRG) is the stronger pick with 20. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 0% for Haemonetics Corporation (HAE). Haemonetics Corporation (HAE) offers the better valuation at 16. 8x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Haemonetics Corporation (HAE) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Haemonetics Corporation (HAE) is the cheapest at 16.

8x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. at 57. 4x. On forward P/E, Haemonetics Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Haemonetics Corporation wins at 0. 61x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 's 2. 01x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

(ISRG) delivered a total return of +61. 5%, compared to -10. 4% for Haemonetics Corporation (HAE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ISRG returned +556. 9% versus HAE's +89. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Haemonetics Corporation (HAE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

48β versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 's 1. 02β — meaning ISRG is approximately 113% more volatile than HAE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 149% for Haemonetics Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

(ISRG) is pulling ahead at 20. 5% versus 4. 0% for Haemonetics Corporation (HAE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Haemonetics Corporation grew EPS 44. 5% year-over-year, compared to 22. 6% for Intuitive Surgical, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ISRG leads at 17. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

(ISRG) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 4% net margin versus 12. 3% for Haemonetics Corporation — meaning it keeps 28. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ISRG leads at 29. 3% versus 16. 3% for HAE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ISRG leads at 66. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Haemonetics Corporation (HAE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 61x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 's 2. 01x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Haemonetics Corporation (HAE) trades at 10. 6x forward P/E versus 43. 7x for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. — 33. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HAE: 52. 1% to $84. 60.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Haemonetics Corporation (HAE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

48)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HAE: +89. 4%, ISRG: +556. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: HAE is a small-cap deep-value stock; ISRG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.