HAL
Halliburton Company
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$33.74B
5Y Perf.+243.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
HAL vs WFRD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
WFRD
Weatherford International plc
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$7.77B
5Y Perf.+5318.5%
HAL vs WFRD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | HAL | WFRD |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $33.74B | $7.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $22.17B | $4.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.54B | $463M |
| Gross Margin | 15.3% | 45.9% |
| Operating Margin | 11.3% | 15.1% |
| Forward P/E | 17.4x | 19.0x |
| Total Debt | $8.13B | $1.75B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.21B | $1.04B |
HAL vs WFRD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
HAL
WFRD
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Halliburton Company (HAL) | 100 | 343.8 | +243.8% |
| Weatherford Interna… (WFRD) | 100 | 5418.5 | +5318.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HAL vs WFRD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: HAL leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Weatherford International plc is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
HAL
Halliburton Company
The Income Pick
HAL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.57, yield 1.7%
- Rev growth -3.3%, EPS growth -47.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 77.4%, current ratio 2.04x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
WFRD
Weatherford International plc
The Long-Run Compounder
WFRD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 350.7% 10Y total return vs HAL's 17.2%
- 9.5% margin vs HAL's 6.9%
- +150.8% vs HAL's +111.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | HAL | -3.3% revenue growth vs WFRD's -10.8% |
| Value | HAL | Lower P/E (17.4x vs 19.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | WFRD | 9.5% margin vs HAL's 6.9% |
| Stability / Safety | HAL | Beta 0.57 vs WFRD's 1.25, lower leverage |
| Dividends | HAL | 1.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs WFRD's 0.9% |
| Momentum (1Y) | WFRD | +150.8% vs HAL's +111.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WFRD | 9.3% ROA vs HAL's 6.1%, ROIC 24.9% vs 10.2% |
HAL vs WFRD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
HAL vs WFRD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLWFRDLAGGINGHAL
HALHalliburton Company
1leads
WFRDWeatherford Internati…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs HALMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
WFRD4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
WFRD7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
WFRD5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
HAL2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WFRD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $22.2B annually — 4.5x WFRD's $4.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 9.5% (WFRD) to 6.9% (HAL). On growth, HAL holds the edge at -0.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | HALHalliburton Compa… | WFRDWeatherford Inter… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $22.2B | $4.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.4B | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.5B | $463M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.7B | $466M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +45.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +15.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +9.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +9.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.3% | -3.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +129.2% | +44.7% |
WFRD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HAL and WFRD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.3x trailing earnings, WFRD trades at a 32% valuation discount to HAL's 26.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WFRD's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HAL's 11.7x.
| Metric | HALHalliburton Compa… | WFRDWeatherford Inter… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $33.7B | $7.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $39.7B | $8.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.93x | 18.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.39x | 19.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.68x | 8.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.52x | 1.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.23x | 4.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.18x | 17.27x |
Evenly matched — HAL and WFRD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WFRD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WFRD delivers a 28.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $15 for HAL. HAL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.77x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WFRD's 1.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WFRD scores 6/9 vs HAL's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | HALHalliburton Compa… | WFRDWeatherford Inter… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.6% | +28.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.1% | +9.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.2% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.6% | +21.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.77x | 1.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.9B | $709M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.2B | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.1B | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.19x | 5.45x |
WFRD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WFRD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WFRD five years ago would be worth $98,151 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,477 for HAL. Over the past 12 months, WFRD leads with a +150.8% total return vs HAL's +111.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WFRD at 22.5% vs HAL's 12.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | HALHalliburton Compa… | WFRDWeatherford Inter… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +37.0% | +34.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +111.3% | +150.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.6% | +83.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +94.8% | +881.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.2% | +350.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.3% | +22.5% |
WFRD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HAL and WFRD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HAL is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WFRD's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | HALHalliburton Compa… | WFRDWeatherford Inter… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | 1.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.46 | $112.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.22 | $42.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.1% | +96.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.8 | 62.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15.0M | 1.4M |
Evenly matched — HAL and WFRD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
HAL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HAL as "Buy" and WFRD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -8.2% upside for HAL (target: $37) vs -24.3% for WFRD (target: $82). For income investors, HAL offers the higher dividend yield at 1.71% vs WFRD's 0.92%.
| Metric | HALHalliburton Compa… | WFRDWeatherford Inter… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.08 | $82.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 64 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.7% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.69 | $0.99 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | +1.3% |
HAL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
WFRD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HAL leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
Best OverallWeatherford International p… (WFRD)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
HAL vs WFRD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HAL or WFRD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Halliburton Company (HAL) is the stronger pick with -3.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 8% for Weatherford International plc (WFRD). Weatherford International plc (WFRD) offers the better valuation at 18. 3x trailing P/E (19. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Halliburton Company (HAL) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HAL or WFRD?
On trailing P/E, Weatherford International plc (WFRD) is the cheapest at 18.
3x versus Halliburton Company at 26. 9x. On forward P/E, Halliburton Company is actually cheaper at 17. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HAL or WFRD?
Over the past 5 years, Weatherford International plc (WFRD) delivered a total return of +881.
5%, compared to +94. 8% for Halliburton Company (HAL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WFRD returned +350. 7% versus HAL's +17. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HAL or WFRD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Halliburton Company (HAL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
57β versus Weatherford International plc's 1. 25β — meaning WFRD is approximately 119% more volatile than HAL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Halliburton Company (HAL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 77% versus 103% for Weatherford International plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HAL or WFRD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Halliburton Company (HAL) is pulling ahead at -3.
3% versus -10. 8% for Weatherford International plc (WFRD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Weatherford International plc grew EPS -12. 1% year-over-year, compared to -47. 0% for Halliburton Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, WFRD leads at 4. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HAL or WFRD?
Weatherford International plc (WFRD) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
8% net margin versus 5. 8% for Halliburton Company — meaning it keeps 8. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WFRD leads at 15. 4% versus 10. 2% for HAL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WFRD leads at 21. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HAL or WFRD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Halliburton Company (HAL) trades at 17.
4x forward P/E versus 19. 0x for Weatherford International plc — 1. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HAL: -8. 2% to $37. 08.
08Which pays a better dividend — HAL or WFRD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Halliburton Company (HAL) offers the highest yield at 1. 7%, versus 0. 9% for Weatherford International plc (WFRD).
09Is HAL or WFRD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Halliburton Company (HAL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
57), 1. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HAL: +17. 2%, WFRD: +350. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HAL and WFRD?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(HAL: -0.3% · WFRD: -3.4%)Net Margin>
%
(HAL: 6.9% · WFRD: 9.5%)P/E Ratio<
x
(HAL: 26.9x · WFRD: 18.3x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.