HAL
Halliburton Company
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$32.68B
5Y Perf.+233.0%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
HAL vs WFRD vs SLB vs BKR vs NOV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
WFRD
Weatherford International plc
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$7.34B
5Y Perf.+5015.0%
SLB
SLB N.V.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$79.62B
5Y Perf.+187.2%
BKR
Baker Hughes Company
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$63.00B
5Y Perf.+284.8%
NOV
NOV Inc.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$6.96B
5Y Perf.+54.8%
HAL vs WFRD vs SLB vs BKR vs NOV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | HAL | WFRD | SLB | BKR | NOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $32.68B | $7.34B | $79.62B | $63.00B | $6.96B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $22.17B | $4.88B | $35.71B | $27.89B | $8.69B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.54B | $463M | $3.35B | $3.12B | $91M |
| Gross Margin | 15.3% | 45.9% | 18.2% | 23.6% | 19.5% |
| Operating Margin | 11.3% | 15.1% | 15.3% | 25.3% | 5.3% |
| Forward P/E | 16.8x | 17.9x | 19.8x | 26.5x | 21.7x |
| Total Debt | $8.13B | $1.75B | $12.31B | $7.14B | $2.34B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.21B | $1.04B | $3.04B | $3.71B | $1.55B |
HAL vs WFRD vs SLB vs BKR vs NOV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
HAL
WFRD
SLB
BKR
NOV
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Halliburton Company (HAL) | 100 | 333.0 | +233.0% |
| Weatherford Interna… (WFRD) | 100 | 5115.0 | +5015.0% |
| SLB N.V. (SLB) | 100 | 287.2 | +187.2% |
| Baker Hughes Company (BKR) | 100 | 384.8 | +284.8% |
| NOV Inc. (NOV) | 100 | 154.8 | +54.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HAL vs WFRD vs SLB vs BKR vs NOV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: HAL and WFRD are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Weatherford International plc is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment and operational efficiency and capital deployment. BKR and NOV also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
HAL
Halliburton Company
The Defensive Pick
HAL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 77.4%, current ratio 2.04x
- Lower P/E (16.8x vs 26.5x)
- Beta 0.57 vs WFRD's 1.25, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
WFRD
Weatherford International plc
The Long-Run Compounder
WFRD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 325.9% 10Y total return vs BKR's 186.8%
- +140.2% vs SLB's +61.8%
- 9.3% ROA vs NOV's 0.8%, ROIC 24.9% vs 5.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
SLB
SLB N.V.
The Income Angle
Among these 5 stocks, SLB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
Best for: energy exposure
BKR
Baker Hughes Company
The Growth Play
BKR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth -0.3%, EPS growth -12.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.4%
- -0.3% revenue growth vs WFRD's -10.8%
- 11.2% margin vs NOV's 1.0%
Best for: growth exposure
NOV
NOV Inc.
The Income Pick
NOV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.01, yield 2.6%
- Beta 1.01, yield 2.6%, current ratio 2.42x
- 2.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs HAL's 1.8%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | BKR | -0.3% revenue growth vs WFRD's -10.8% |
| Value | HAL | Lower P/E (16.8x vs 26.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | BKR | 11.2% margin vs NOV's 1.0% |
| Stability / Safety | HAL | Beta 0.57 vs WFRD's 1.25, lower leverage |
| Dividends | NOV | 2.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs HAL's 1.8% |
| Momentum (1Y) | WFRD | +140.2% vs SLB's +61.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WFRD | 9.3% ROA vs NOV's 0.8%, ROIC 24.9% vs 5.8% |
HAL vs WFRD vs SLB vs BKR vs NOV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
HAL vs WFRD vs SLB vs BKR vs NOV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLNOVLAGGINGSLB
Who Leads Where
NOV leads in 2 of 6 categories
BKR leads 1 • WFRD leads 1 • HAL leads 0 • SLB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓SLBSLB N.V.
0leads
HALHalliburton Company
0leads
BKRBaker Hughes Company
1leads
WFRDWeatherford Internati…
1leads
NOVNOV Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs WFRDvs BKRMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
BKR3/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
NOV3/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
WFRD7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
NOV2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.7B annually — 7.3x WFRD's $4.9B. BKR is the more profitable business, keeping 11.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NOV's 1.0%. On growth, SLB holds the edge at +5.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | HALHalliburton Compa… | WFRDWeatherford Inter… | SLBSLB N.V. | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | NOVNOV Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $22.2B | $4.9B | $35.7B | $27.9B | $8.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.4B | $1.0B | $7.4B | $4.5B | $725M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.5B | $463M | $3.4B | $3.1B | $91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.7B | $466M | $4.8B | $2.6B | $734M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +45.9% | +18.2% | +23.6% | +19.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +15.1% | +15.3% | +25.3% | +5.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +9.5% | +9.4% | +11.2% | +1.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +9.6% | +13.4% | +9.4% | +8.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.3% | -3.4% | +5.0% | +2.5% | -2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +129.2% | +44.7% | -31.2% | +132.5% | -73.7% |
BKR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
NOV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.3x trailing earnings, WFRD trades at a 65% valuation discount to NOV's 49.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WFRD's 7.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BKR's 14.0x.
| Metric | HALHalliburton Compa… | WFRDWeatherford Inter… | SLBSLB N.V. | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | NOVNOV Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $32.7B | $7.3B | $79.6B | $63.0B | $7.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $38.6B | $8.0B | $88.9B | $66.4B | $7.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.09x | 17.25x | 22.57x | 24.43x | 49.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.85x | 17.94x | 19.79x | 26.48x | 21.73x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.37x | 7.86x | 12.07x | 14.00x | 8.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.47x | 1.49x | 2.23x | 2.27x | 0.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.13x | 4.38x | 2.89x | 3.32x | 1.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.55x | 16.30x | 16.60x | 24.83x | 8.06x |
NOV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WFRD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WFRD delivers a 28.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $1 for NOV. NOV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WFRD's 1.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WFRD scores 6/9 vs SLB's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | HALHalliburton Compa… | WFRDWeatherford Inter… | SLBSLB N.V. | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | NOVNOV Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.6% | +28.3% | +13.9% | +16.1% | +1.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.1% | +9.3% | +6.5% | +7.3% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.2% | +24.9% | +12.1% | +12.7% | +5.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.6% | +21.2% | +14.3% | +13.6% | +6.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.77x | 1.03x | 0.45x | 0.38x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.9B | $709M | $9.3B | $3.4B | $788M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.2B | $1.0B | $3.0B | $3.7B | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.1B | $1.8B | $12.3B | $7.1B | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.19x | 5.45x | 9.40x | 9.68x | 5.82x |
WFRD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — WFRD and BKR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WFRD five years ago would be worth $90,818 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,957 for NOV. Over the past 12 months, WFRD leads with a +140.2% total return vs SLB's +61.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BKR at 33.1% vs SLB's 6.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | HALHalliburton Compa… | WFRDWeatherford Inter… | SLBSLB N.V. | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | NOVNOV Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.8% | +27.1% | +32.7% | +35.7% | +18.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +105.6% | +140.2% | +61.8% | +77.5% | +67.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.4% | +73.6% | +20.8% | +136.0% | +29.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +82.6% | +808.2% | +80.6% | +175.3% | +19.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.2% | +325.9% | -9.2% | +186.8% | -31.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.2% | +20.2% | +6.5% | +33.1% | +8.9% |
Evenly matched — WFRD and BKR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HAL and SLB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HAL is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WFRD's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | HALHalliburton Compa… | WFRDWeatherford Inter… | SLBSLB N.V. | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | NOVNOV Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | 1.25x | 0.87x | 0.83x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.46 | $112.22 | $57.20 | $70.41 | $20.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.22 | $42.58 | $31.64 | $35.83 | $11.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.2% | +91.2% | +92.7% | +90.2% | +92.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.7 | 61.5 | 57.9 | 57.1 | 55.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15.0M | 1.4M | 16.3M | 9.1M | 4.8M |
Evenly matched — HAL and SLB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
NOV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HAL as "Buy", WFRD as "Buy", SLB as "Buy", BKR as "Buy", NOV as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 13.3% upside for BKR (target: $72) vs -19.8% for WFRD (target: $82). For income investors, NOV offers the higher dividend yield at 2.63% vs WFRD's 0.97%.
| Metric | HALHalliburton Compa… | WFRDWeatherford Inter… | SLBSLB N.V. | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | NOVNOV Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.08 | $82.00 | $56.95 | $72.00 | $19.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 64 | 39 | 66 | 45 | 58 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | +1.0% | +2.0% | +1.4% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.69 | $0.99 | $1.08 | $0.92 | $0.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.1% | +1.4% | +3.0% | +0.6% | +4.5% |
NOV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
NOV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). BKR leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
Best OverallNOV Inc. (NOV)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
HAL vs WFRD vs SLB vs BKR vs NOV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HAL or WFRD or SLB or BKR or NOV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is the stronger pick with -0.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 8% for Weatherford International plc (WFRD). Weatherford International plc (WFRD) offers the better valuation at 17. 3x trailing P/E (17. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Halliburton Company (HAL) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HAL or WFRD or SLB or BKR or NOV?
On trailing P/E, Weatherford International plc (WFRD) is the cheapest at 17.
3x versus NOV Inc. at 49. 5x. On forward P/E, Halliburton Company is actually cheaper at 16. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HAL or WFRD or SLB or BKR or NOV?
Over the past 5 years, Weatherford International plc (WFRD) delivered a total return of +808.
2%, compared to +19. 6% for NOV Inc. (NOV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WFRD returned +325. 9% versus NOV's -31. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HAL or WFRD or SLB or BKR or NOV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Halliburton Company (HAL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
57β versus Weatherford International plc's 1. 25β — meaning WFRD is approximately 119% more volatile than HAL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NOV Inc. (NOV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 103% for Weatherford International plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HAL or WFRD or SLB or BKR or NOV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is pulling ahead at -0.
3% versus -10. 8% for Weatherford International plc (WFRD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Weatherford International plc grew EPS -12. 1% year-over-year, compared to -75. 6% for NOV Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BKR leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HAL or WFRD or SLB or BKR or NOV?
SLB N.
V. (SLB) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 4% net margin versus 1. 7% for NOV Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WFRD leads at 15. 4% versus 6. 5% for NOV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BKR leads at 23. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HAL or WFRD or SLB or BKR or NOV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Halliburton Company (HAL) trades at 16.
8x forward P/E versus 26. 5x for Baker Hughes Company — 9. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BKR: 13. 3% to $72. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HAL or WFRD or SLB or BKR or NOV?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NOV Inc. (NOV) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 1. 0% for Weatherford International plc (WFRD).
09Is HAL or WFRD or SLB or BKR or NOV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Halliburton Company (HAL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
57), 1. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HAL: +16. 2%, NOV: -31. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HAL and WFRD and SLB and BKR and NOV?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HAL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WFRD is a small-cap deep-value stock; SLB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NOV is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(HAL: -0.3% · WFRD: -3.4%)Net Margin>
%
(HAL: 6.9% · WFRD: 9.5%)P/E Ratio<
x
(HAL: 26.1x · WFRD: 17.3x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.