Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
HBNC vs MOFG vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
HBNC vs MOFG vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $1.01B | $1.02B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $96M | $351M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-148M | $58M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | -25.0% | 63.2% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | -203.2% | 21.3% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 13.8x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $404M | $117M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $67M | $205M | $343.34B |
HBNC vs MOFG vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Horizon Bancorp, In… (HBNC) | 100 | 184.8 | +84.8% |
| MidWestOne Financia… (MOFG) | 100 | 231.6 | +131.6% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HBNC vs MOFG vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HBNC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.97, yield 2.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 58.8%, current ratio 1.14x
- Beta 0.97, yield 2.1%, current ratio 1.14x
MOFG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +71.2% vs JPM's +21.8%
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs HBNC's 128.4%
- 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs HBNC's -71.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs HBNC's -71.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 13.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HBNC's 1.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs MOFG's 1.34 | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, vs JPM's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +71.2% vs JPM's +21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HBNC's 1.6% |
HBNC vs MOFG vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HBNC vs MOFG vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MOFG and JPM each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 2917.8x HBNC's $96M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HBNC's -154.3%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $96M | $351M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$186M | $74M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$148M | $58M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $66M | $79M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -25.0% | +63.2% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | +21.3% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -154.3% | +16.7% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +68.5% | +22.5% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.6% | +113.6% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HBNC and JPM each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $1.0B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $929M | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.27x | -13.93x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.40x | 13.77x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.81x | 4.94x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.47x | 1.50x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.29x | 16.74x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-15 for HBNC. MOFG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs MOFG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.7% | +10.0% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.2% | +0.9% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.3% | -9.4% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.7% | -9.5% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 0.21x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $338M | -$88M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $67M | $205M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $404M | $117M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.62x | 0.67x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,766 for HBNC. Over the past 12 months, MOFG leads with a +71.2% total return vs JPM's +21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs HBNC's 27.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.3% | +30.2% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.7% | +71.2% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107.4% | +138.2% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.7% | +79.8% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +128.4% | +96.2% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.5% | +33.6% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HBNC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MOFG's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HBNC currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs JPM's 95.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.97x | 1.34x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.75 | $49.69 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.34 | $26.52 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +99.2% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.3 | 74.9 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 306K | 0 | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HBNC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HBNC as "Buy", MOFG as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for JPM (target: $340) vs -36.6% for MOFG (target: $31). For income investors, HBNC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.10% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.50 | $31.25 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 8 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +2.0% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.42 | $0.97 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 4 categories are tied.
HBNC vs MOFG vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HBNC or MOFG or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -71. 0% for Horizon Bancorp, Inc. (HBNC). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Horizon Bancorp, Inc. (HBNC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HBNC or MOFG or JPM?
On forward P/E, Horizon Bancorp, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 9. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HBNC or MOFG or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +27. 7% for Horizon Bancorp, Inc. (HBNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus MOFG's +96. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HBNC or MOFG or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning MOFG is approximately 42% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HBNC or MOFG or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -71. 0% for Horizon Bancorp, Inc. (HBNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JPMorgan Chase & Co. grew EPS 1. 5% year-over-year, compared to -493. 8% for Horizon Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HBNC or MOFG or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -145. 9% for Horizon Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -193. 4% for HBNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HBNC or MOFG or JPM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Horizon Bancorp, Inc.
(HBNC) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 5. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JPM: 5. 9% to $339. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — HBNC or MOFG or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Horizon Bancorp, Inc. (HBNC) offers the highest yield at 2. 1%, versus 1. 9% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is HBNC or MOFG or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, MOFG: +96. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HBNC and MOFG and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HBNC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MOFG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.