Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HCA vs DBVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
HCA vs DBVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $96.01B | $1721.78T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $75.60B | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6.78B | $-168M |
| Gross Margin | 41.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 15.8% | — |
| Forward P/E | 14.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $50.20B | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.04B | $194M |
HCA vs DBVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| HCA Healthcare, Inc. (HCA) | 100 | 401.7 | +301.7% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 41.4 | -58.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HCA vs DBVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HCA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.29, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 7.1%, EPS growth 29.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.9%
- 451.4% 10Y total return vs DBVT's -86.8%
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +114.1% vs HCA's +21.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.1% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.0% margin vs DBVT's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.29 vs DBVT's 1.26 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +114.1% vs HCA's +21.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.3% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
HCA vs DBVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HCA vs DBVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DBVT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HCA and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $75.6B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $75.6B | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $15.5B | -$112M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6.8B | -$168M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7.7B | -$151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.5% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.2% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.6% | +91.5% |
Valuation Metrics
DBVT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $96.0B | $1721.78T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $145.2B | $1721.78T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.13x | -0.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.20x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.72x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.37x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.27x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.48x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HCA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCA scores 7/9 vs DBVT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -130.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.3% | -89.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.9% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +27.0% | -145.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $49.2B | -$172M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $194M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $50.2B | $22M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.37x | -189.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HCA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HCA five years ago would be worth $21,107 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,344 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +114.1% total return vs HCA's +21.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HCA at 16.4% vs DBVT's 6.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.5% | +5.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.2% | +114.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +57.5% | +20.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +111.1% | -66.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +451.4% | -86.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.4% | +6.4% |
Risk & Volatility
HCA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HCA is the less volatile stock with a 0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DBVT's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.29x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $556.52 | $26.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $330.00 | $7.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.2% | +76.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 30.3 | 43.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 253K |
Analyst Outlook
HCA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HCA as "Buy" and DBVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 130.5% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 22.8% for HCA (target: $527). HCA is the only dividend payer here at 0.69% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $527.45 | $46.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 46 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.94 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.5% | 0.0% |
HCA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). DBVT leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics).
HCA vs DBVT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HCA or DBVT a better buy right now?
HCA Healthcare, Inc.
(HCA) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HCA Healthcare, Inc. (HCA) a "Buy" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HCA or DBVT?
Over the past 5 years, HCA Healthcare, Inc.
(HCA) delivered a total return of +111. 1%, compared to -66. 6% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HCA returned +451. 4% versus DBVT's -86. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HCA or DBVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), HCA Healthcare, Inc.
(HCA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 29β versus DBV Technologies S. A. 's 1. 26β — meaning DBVT is approximately 339% more volatile than HCA relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — HCA or DBVT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HCA Healthcare, Inc.
grew EPS 29. 0% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — HCA or DBVT?
HCA Healthcare, Inc.
(HCA) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for DBV Technologies S. A. — meaning it keeps 9. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HCA leads at 15. 8% versus 0. 0% for DBVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HCA leads at 41. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is HCA or DBVT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 130.
5% to $46. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — HCA or DBVT?
In this comparison, HCA (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. DBVT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is HCA or DBVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, HCA Healthcare, Inc.
(HCA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 29), 0. 7% yield, +451. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HCA: +451. 4%, DBVT: -86. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between HCA and DBVT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HCA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. HCA pays a dividend while DBVT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.