Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HCAT vs PINC vs DOCS vs INVA vs TDOC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Biotechnology
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
HCAT vs PINC vs DOCS vs INVA vs TDOC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Biotechnology | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $113M | $2.34B | $5.24B | $1.93B | $1.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $311M | $1.00B | $638M | $424M | $2.51B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-178M | $-24M | $239M | $504M | $-171M |
| Gross Margin | 48.7% | 72.6% | 89.7% | 76.2% | 65.6% |
| Operating Margin | -51.7% | -0.0% | 37.4% | 14.8% | -7.6% |
| Forward P/E | 13.5x | 20.8x | 16.8x | 7.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $20M | $282M | $12M | $269M | $1.04B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $51M | $84M | $210M | $551M | $781M |
HCAT vs PINC vs DOCS vs INVA vs TDOC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Catalyst, In… (HCAT) | 100 | 2.7 | -97.3% |
| Premier, Inc. (PINC) | 100 | 80.8 | -19.2% |
| Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) | 100 | 44.6 | -55.4% |
| Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) | 100 | 170.7 | +70.7% |
| Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) | 100 | 4.4 | -95.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HCAT vs PINC vs DOCS vs INVA vs TDOC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HCAT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PINC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 3.0%
- Beta 0.07 vs HCAT's 2.05
- 3.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +24.0% vs HCAT's -59.9%
DOCS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 54.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 6.97x
- PEG 0.21 vs INVA's 0.71
- 20.0% revenue growth vs PINC's -10.9%
INVA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 94.9% 10Y total return vs PINC's -4.6%
- Beta 0.13, current ratio 14.64x
- 118.9% margin vs HCAT's -57.2%
- 32.4% ROA vs HCAT's -27.4%, ROIC 14.2% vs -32.9%
Among these 5 stocks, TDOC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.0% revenue growth vs PINC's -10.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.8x vs 20.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 118.9% margin vs HCAT's -57.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs HCAT's 2.05 | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.0% vs HCAT's -59.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.4% ROA vs HCAT's -27.4%, ROIC 14.2% vs -32.9% |
HCAT vs PINC vs DOCS vs INVA vs TDOC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HCAT vs PINC vs DOCS vs INVA vs TDOC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DOCS leads in 1 of 6 categories
INVA leads 1 • PINC leads 1 • HCAT leads 0 • TDOC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — DOCS and INVA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDOC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 8.1x HCAT's $311M. INVA is the more profitable business, keeping 118.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HCAT's -57.2%. On growth, INVA holds the edge at +10.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $311M | $1.0B | $638M | $424M | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$110M | $118M | $250M | $86M | $42M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$178M | -$24M | $239M | $504M | -$171M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $265M | $314M | $181M | $251M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.7% | +72.6% | +89.7% | +76.2% | +65.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -51.7% | -0.0% | +37.4% | +14.8% | -7.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -57.2% | -2.4% | +37.5% | +118.9% | -6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | +26.4% | +49.2% | +42.8% | +10.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.2% | -3.3% | +9.8% | +10.6% | -2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.9% | -70.0% | -16.2% | +4.0% | +32.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HCAT and INVA and TDOC each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.9x trailing earnings, INVA trades at a 95% valuation discount to PINC's 128.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DOCS offers better value at 0.30x vs INVA's 0.67x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $113M | $2.3B | $5.2B | $1.9B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $82M | $2.5B | $5.0B | $1.7B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.62x | 128.45x | 23.45x | 6.91x | -6.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.52x | 20.79x | 16.83x | 7.31x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.30x | 0.67x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 21.35x | 21.14x | 8.10x | 15.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.36x | 2.31x | 9.18x | 4.55x | 0.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.45x | 1.70x | 4.84x | 1.65x | 0.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.33x | 19.64x | 9.88x | 4.40x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DOCS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INVA delivers a 46.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $-55 for HCAT. DOCS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TDOC's 0.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DOCS scores 9/9 vs PINC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -54.7% | -1.6% | +24.4% | +46.5% | -12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -27.4% | -0.8% | +20.7% | +32.4% | -5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -32.9% | +0.0% | +20.0% | +14.2% | -11.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -34.0% | +0.0% | +22.3% | +12.4% | -10.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.18x | 0.01x | 0.23x | 0.75x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$31M | $198M | -$197M | -$282M | $259M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $51M | $84M | $210M | $551M | $781M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $20M | $282M | $12M | $269M | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.79x | 1.13x | — | 63.45x | -8.76x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INVA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INVA five years ago would be worth $19,437 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $299 for HCAT. Over the past 12 months, PINC leads with a +24.0% total return vs HCAT's -59.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INVA at 25.0% vs HCAT's -49.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -30.3% | — | -39.9% | +14.7% | -1.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -59.9% | +24.0% | -55.4% | +21.7% | +1.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.9% | +14.8% | -24.2% | +95.2% | -73.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.0% | -9.2% | -50.9% | +94.4% | -95.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.9% | -4.6% | -50.9% | +94.9% | -41.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -49.2% | +4.7% | -8.8% | +25.0% | -35.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PINC and INVA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PINC is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HCAT's 2.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PINC currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs HCAT's 31.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.93x | 0.21x | 0.99x | 0.11x | 1.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.06 | $28.79 | $76.51 | $25.15 | $9.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.96 | $20.62 | $20.55 | $16.52 | $4.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +31.4% | +98.2% | +34.0% | +90.7% | +71.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.9 | 65.0 | 60.1 | 39.9 | 74.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 720K | 0 | 2.7M | 621K | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
PINC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HCAT as "Buy", PINC as "Hold", DOCS as "Buy", INVA as "Buy", TDOC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 75.4% upside for INVA (target: $40) vs 8.9% for TDOC (target: $8). PINC is the only dividend payer here at 2.98% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.50 | $33.15 | $42.79 | $40.00 | $7.58 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 31 | 22 | 10 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.0% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.84 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.4% | +17.1% | +2.3% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
DOCS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). INVA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
HCAT vs PINC vs DOCS vs INVA vs TDOC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HCAT or PINC or DOCS or INVA or TDOC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 9% for Premier, Inc. (PINC). Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) offers the better valuation at 6. 9x trailing P/E (7. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Health Catalyst, Inc. (HCAT) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HCAT or PINC or DOCS or INVA or TDOC?
On trailing P/E, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the cheapest at 6. 9x versus Premier, Inc. at 128. 5x. On forward P/E, Innoviva, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Doximity, Inc. wins at 0. 21x versus Innoviva, Inc. 's 0. 71x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HCAT or PINC or DOCS or INVA or TDOC?
Over the past 5 years, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) delivered a total return of +94. 4%, compared to -97. 0% for Health Catalyst, Inc. (HCAT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INVA returned +95. 6% versus HCAT's -96. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HCAT or PINC or DOCS or INVA or TDOC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 11β versus Health Catalyst, Inc. 's 1. 93β — meaning HCAT is approximately 1595% more volatile than INVA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 75% for Teladoc Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HCAT or PINC or DOCS or INVA or TDOC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -10. 9% for Premier, Inc. (PINC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Innoviva, Inc. grew EPS 816. 7% year-over-year, compared to -121. 7% for Health Catalyst, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DOCS leads at 18. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HCAT or PINC or DOCS or INVA or TDOC?
Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the more profitable company, earning 63. 8% net margin versus -57. 2% for Health Catalyst, Inc. — meaning it keeps 63. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DOCS leads at 39. 9% versus -51. 7% for HCAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DOCS leads at 90. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HCAT or PINC or DOCS or INVA or TDOC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 21x versus Innoviva, Inc. 's 0. 71x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) trades at 7. 3x forward P/E versus 20. 8x for Premier, Inc. — 13. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INVA: 75. 4% to $40. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HCAT or PINC or DOCS or INVA or TDOC?
In this comparison, PINC (3.
0% yield) pays a dividend. HCAT, DOCS, INVA, TDOC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HCAT or PINC or DOCS or INVA or TDOC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Premier, Inc.
(PINC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 21), 3. 0% yield). Health Catalyst, Inc. (HCAT) carries a higher beta of 1. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PINC: -4. 6%, HCAT: -96. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HCAT and PINC and DOCS and INVA and TDOC?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HCAT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PINC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DOCS is a small-cap high-growth stock; INVA is a small-cap high-growth stock; TDOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. PINC pays a dividend while HCAT, DOCS, INVA, TDOC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.