Restaurants
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HCHL vs PLBY vs PRKS vs GIII vs PVH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
Leisure
Apparel - Manufacturers
Apparel - Manufacturers
HCHL vs PLBY vs PRKS vs GIII vs PVH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Leisure | Leisure | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $14M | $188M | $2.02B | $1.32B | $4.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8M | $121M | $1.66B | $2.96B | $8.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $-13M | $168M | $67M | $469M |
| Gross Margin | 27.3% | 71.0% | 92.3% | 38.7% | 58.2% |
| Operating Margin | 15.8% | -6.3% | 22.0% | 5.3% | 7.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.8x | 10.0x | 10.8x | 8.1x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $24M | $0.00 | $12M | $3.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $38M | $100M | $407M | $748M |
HCHL vs PLBY vs PRKS vs GIII vs PVH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Happy City Holdings… (HCHL) | 100 | 39.2 | -60.8% |
| Playboy, Inc. (PLBY) | 100 | 103.1 | +3.1% |
| United Parks & Reso… (PRKS) | 100 | 78.6 | -21.4% |
| G-III Apparel Group… (GIII) | 100 | 139.7 | +39.7% |
| PVH Corp. (PVH) | 100 | 129.2 | +29.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HCHL vs PLBY vs PRKS vs GIII vs PVH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HCHL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 22.8%, EPS growth 100.0%
- 22.8% revenue growth vs GIII's -7.0%
- 15.9% margin vs PLBY's -10.5%
- Beta 0.36 vs PLBY's 1.96
PLBY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +54.6% vs HCHL's -59.8%
PRKS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 103.5% 10Y total return vs PVH's -1.9%
GIII is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.08
- PEG 0.42 vs PVH's 0.60
PVH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.48, Low D/E 66.0%, current ratio 1.27x
- Beta 1.48, yield 0.2%, current ratio 1.27x
- Lower P/E (8.1x vs 10.0x)
- 0.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.8% revenue growth vs GIII's -7.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 10.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.9% margin vs PLBY's -10.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.36 vs PLBY's 1.96 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.6% vs HCHL's -59.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.0% ROA vs PLBY's -4.6%, ROIC 40.6% vs -2.9% |
HCHL vs PLBY vs PRKS vs GIII vs PVH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HCHL vs PLBY vs PRKS vs GIII vs PVH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRKS leads in 1 of 6 categories
PVH leads 1 • HCHL leads 1 • GIII leads 1 • PLBY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRKS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PVH is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.8B annually — 1058.2x HCHL's $8M. HCHL is the more profitable business, keeping 15.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLBY's -10.5%. On growth, PVH holds the edge at +4.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8M | $121M | $1.7B | $3.0B | $8.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $684,000 | $540M | $186M | $924M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$13M | $168M | $67M | $469M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$1M | $263M | $44M | $516M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.3% | +71.0% | +92.3% | +38.7% | +58.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | -6.3% | +22.0% | +5.3% | +7.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | -10.5% | +10.1% | +2.3% | +5.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | -0.8% | +15.8% | +1.5% | +5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -58.1% | -2.8% | -8.1% | +4.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +120.8% | -44.0% | -169.7% | +65.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PVH leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.4x trailing earnings, PVH trades at a 60% valuation discount to GIII's 20.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PVH offers better value at 0.62x vs GIII's 0.80x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $188M | $2.0B | $1.3B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16M | $174M | $1.9B | $926M | $6.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -12.85x | 12.11x | 20.73x | 8.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.78x | 9.99x | 10.79x | 8.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.80x | 0.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.13x | 34.02x | 3.56x | 4.99x | 6.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.75x | 1.56x | 1.22x | 0.45x | 0.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 9.22x | — | 0.79x | 0.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 29.39x | — | 7.68x | — | 6.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HCHL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HCHL delivers a 2.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-2 for PLBY. GIII carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HCHL's 8.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCHL scores 7/9 vs GIII's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.2% | -2.5% | — | +3.9% | +9.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +24.0% | -4.6% | +6.4% | +2.6% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +40.6% | -2.9% | +25.5% | +7.5% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +62.3% | -1.4% | +15.8% | +6.1% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 8.19x | 1.30x | — | 0.01x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | -$14M | -$100M | -$395M | $2.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $38M | $100M | $407M | $748M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $24M | $0 | $12M | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.20x | -0.39x | 2.69x | 275.62x | 2.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GIII leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GIII five years ago would be worth $9,133 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $339 for PLBY. Over the past 12 months, PLBY leads with a +54.6% total return vs HCHL's -59.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GIII at 24.8% vs HCHL's -26.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -49.8% | -9.2% | +2.3% | +6.4% | +30.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -59.8% | +54.6% | -18.7% | +21.0% | +24.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.8% | -8.7% | -34.3% | +94.4% | +7.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.8% | -96.6% | -31.0% | -8.7% | -24.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.8% | -83.1% | +103.5% | -27.0% | -1.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.2% | -3.0% | -13.1% | +24.8% | +2.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HCHL and GIII each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HCHL is the less volatile stock with a 0.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLBY's 1.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GIII currently trades 89.9% from its 52-week high vs HCHL's 27.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.36x | 1.96x | 1.54x | 1.08x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.25 | $2.75 | $56.95 | $34.83 | $100.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.80 | $1.06 | $28.77 | $20.33 | $59.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.7% | +60.7% | +65.1% | +89.9% | +88.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.0 | 45.9 | 54.8 | 62.9 | 60.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 82K | 775K | 944K | 522K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PLBY as "Buy", PRKS as "Buy", GIII as "Buy", PVH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 656.3% upside for PLBY (target: $13) vs 7.8% for GIII (target: $34). PVH is the only dividend payer here at 0.17% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.63 | $47.60 | $33.75 | $100.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 | 23 | 29 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% | +12.9% |
PRKS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). PVH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
HCHL vs PLBY vs PRKS vs GIII vs PVH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HCHL or PLBY or PRKS or GIII or PVH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares (HCHL) is the stronger pick with 22.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 0% for G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (GIII). PVH Corp. (PVH) offers the better valuation at 8. 4x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Playboy, Inc. (PLBY) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HCHL or PLBY or PRKS or GIII or PVH?
On trailing P/E, PVH Corp.
(PVH) is the cheapest at 8. 4x versus G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. at 20. 7x. On forward P/E, PVH Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. wins at 0. 42x versus PVH Corp. 's 0. 60x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HCHL or PLBY or PRKS or GIII or PVH?
Over the past 5 years, G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.
(GIII) delivered a total return of -8. 7%, compared to -96. 6% for Playboy, Inc. (PLBY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRKS returned +103. 5% versus PLBY's -83. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HCHL or PLBY or PRKS or GIII or PVH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares (HCHL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
36β versus Playboy, Inc. 's 1. 96β — meaning PLBY is approximately 438% more volatile than HCHL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (GIII) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 8% for Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HCHL or PLBY or PRKS or GIII or PVH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares (HCHL) is pulling ahead at 22.
8% versus -7. 0% for G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (GIII). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -64. 0% for G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRKS leads at -1. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HCHL or PLBY or PRKS or GIII or PVH?
Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares (HCHL) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
9% net margin versus -10. 5% for Playboy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRKS leads at 22. 0% versus -2. 7% for PLBY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRKS leads at 92. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HCHL or PLBY or PRKS or GIII or PVH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (GIII) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 42x versus PVH Corp. 's 0. 60x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, PVH Corp. (PVH) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 22. 8x for Playboy, Inc. — 14. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLBY: 656. 3% to $12. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — HCHL or PLBY or PRKS or GIII or PVH?
In this comparison, PVH (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. HCHL, PLBY, PRKS, GIII do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HCHL or PLBY or PRKS or GIII or PVH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares (HCHL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
36)). Playboy, Inc. (PLBY) carries a higher beta of 1. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HCHL: -59. 8%, PLBY: -83. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HCHL and PLBY and PRKS and GIII and PVH?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HCHL is a small-cap high-growth stock; PLBY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRKS is a small-cap deep-value stock; GIII is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PVH is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.