Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HCSG vs BGSF vs KELYA vs TBI vs CCRN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HCSG
Healthcare Services Group, Inc.

Medical - Care Facilities

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.60B
5Y Perf.-6.7%
BGSF
BGSF, Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$58M
5Y Perf.-50.2%
KELYA
Kelly Services, Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$349M
5Y Perf.-35.3%
TBI
TrueBlue, Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$182M
5Y Perf.-61.1%
CCRN
Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.

Medical - Care Facilities

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$423M
5Y Perf.+115.7%

HCSG vs BGSF vs KELYA vs TBI vs CCRN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HCSG logoHCSG
BGSF logoBGSF
KELYA logoKELYA
TBI logoTBI
CCRN logoCCRN
IndustryMedical - Care FacilitiesStaffing & Employment ServicesStaffing & Employment ServicesStaffing & Employment ServicesMedical - Care Facilities
Market Cap$1.60B$58M$349M$182M$423M
Revenue (TTM)$1.84B$51M$3.09B$1.25B$761M
Net Income (TTM)$59M$-11M$-266M$-53M$-99M
Gross Margin13.3%35.9%26.3%28.4%18.2%
Operating Margin3.0%-21.7%-2.8%-2.6%-0.9%
Forward P/E20.8x11.0x133.8x
Total Debt$25M$2M$159M$171M$2M
Cash & Equiv.$161M$19M$33M$25M$109M

HCSG vs BGSF vs KELYA vs TBI vs CCRNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HCSG
BGSF
KELYA
TBI
CCRN
StockMay 20May 26Return
Healthcare Services… (HCSG)10093.3-6.7%
BGSF, Inc. (BGSF)10049.8-50.2%
Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA)10064.7-35.3%
TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI)10038.9-61.1%
Cross Country Healt… (CCRN)100215.7+115.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HCSG vs BGSF vs KELYA vs TBI vs CCRN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HCSG leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. BGSF, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. KELYA and CCRN also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
HCSG
Healthcare Services Group, Inc.
The Growth Play

HCSG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 7.1%, EPS growth 52.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.8%
  • 7.1% revenue growth vs BGSF's -65.8%
  • 3.2% margin vs BGSF's -21.2%
  • 7.3% ROA vs CCRN's -19.8%, ROIC 9.0% vs -0.9%
Best for: growth exposure
BGSF
BGSF, Inc.
The Income Pick

BGSF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 38.9%
  • Beta 0.95, yield 38.9%, current ratio 4.12x
  • 38.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KELYA's 3.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
  • +125.0% vs KELYA's -12.2%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
KELYA
Kelly Services, Inc.
The Value Play

KELYA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (11.0x vs 133.8x)
Best for: value
TBI
TrueBlue, Inc.
The Industrials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, TBI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
CCRN
Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CCRN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • -10.5% 10Y total return vs HCSG's -26.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.78, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 3.78x
  • Beta 0.78 vs TBI's 1.13, lower leverage
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHCSG logoHCSG7.1% revenue growth vs BGSF's -65.8%
ValueKELYA logoKELYALower P/E (11.0x vs 133.8x)
Quality / MarginsHCSG logoHCSG3.2% margin vs BGSF's -21.2%
Stability / SafetyCCRN logoCCRNBeta 0.78 vs TBI's 1.13, lower leverage
DividendsBGSF logoBGSF38.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KELYA's 3.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)BGSF logoBGSF+125.0% vs KELYA's -12.2%
Efficiency (ROA)HCSG logoHCSG7.3% ROA vs CCRN's -19.8%, ROIC 9.0% vs -0.9%

HCSG vs BGSF vs KELYA vs TBI vs CCRN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

HCSGHealthcare Services Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Dietary Services
55.1%$1.0B
Environmental Services
44.9%$825M
BGSFBGSF, Inc.
FY 2025
Property Management
100.0%$93M
KELYAKelly Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Science, Engineering & Technology
55.1%$1.2B
Education
44.9%$1.0B
TBITrueBlue, Inc.
FY 2025
PeopleReady
54.7%$884M
PeopleManagement
33.7%$544M
PeopleScout
11.6%$188M
CCRNCross Country Healthcare, Inc.
FY 2025
Other Services
100.0%$30M

HCSG vs BGSF vs KELYA vs TBI vs CCRN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHCSGLAGGINGCCRN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HCSG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

KELYA is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 60.6x BGSF's $51M. HCSG is the more profitable business, keeping 3.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BGSF's -21.2%. On growth, HCSG holds the edge at +6.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricHCSG logoHCSGHealthcare Servic…BGSF logoBGSFBGSF, Inc.KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…TBI logoTBITrueBlue, Inc.CCRN logoCCRNCross Country Hea…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.8B$51M$3.1B$1.2B$761M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$72M-$11M-$54M-$10M$9M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$59M-$11M-$266M-$53M-$99M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$139M-$987,000$66M-$60M$41M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+13.3%+35.9%+26.3%+28.4%+18.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+3.0%-21.7%-2.8%-2.6%-0.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.2%-21.2%-8.6%-4.3%-13.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+7.6%-1.9%+2.1%-4.8%+5.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.6%-67.0%-100.0%-100.0%-100.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+175.0%+100.0%-2.1%-37.5%-6.0%
HCSG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

KELYA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, HCSG's 22.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TBI's 160.0x.

MetricHCSG logoHCSGHealthcare Servic…BGSF logoBGSFBGSF, Inc.KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…TBI logoTBITrueBlue, Inc.CCRN logoCCRNCross Country Hea…
Market CapShares × price$1.6B$58M$349M$182M$423M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.5B$41M$475M$329M$317M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS27.54x-7.43x-1.34x-3.73x-4.47x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.83x10.96x133.84x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple22.38x160.03x23.75x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.87x0.63x0.08x0.11x0.40x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.19x1.20x0.35x0.65x1.31x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.49x3.06x10.55x
KELYA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HCSG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

HCSG delivers a 11.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-27 for CCRN. CCRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TBI's 0.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCSG scores 7/9 vs TBI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricHCSG logoHCSGHealthcare Servic…BGSF logoBGSFBGSF, Inc.KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…TBI logoTBITrueBlue, Inc.CCRN logoCCRNCross Country Hea…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.8%-19.3%-24.6%-18.7%-27.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+7.3%-12.6%-11.3%-8.1%-19.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.0%-8.5%-4.0%-5.2%-0.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.7%-10.8%-4.3%-5.3%-0.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–974546
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.05x0.03x0.16x0.62x0.01x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$136M-$17M$126M$146M-$106M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$161M$19M$33M$25M$109M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$25M$2M$159M$171M$2M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense33.02x-2.88x-12.07x-46.19x-1.39x
HCSG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HCSG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HCSG five years ago would be worth $7,888 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,130 for TBI. Over the past 12 months, BGSF leads with a +125.0% total return vs KELYA's -12.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HCSG at 14.1% vs TBI's -26.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHCSG logoHCSGHealthcare Servic…BGSF logoBGSFBGSF, Inc.KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…TBI logoTBITrueBlue, Inc.CCRN logoCCRNCross Country Hea…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+28.6%+11.3%+13.1%+36.6%+62.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+55.8%+125.0%-12.2%+51.0%-5.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+48.6%-20.4%-34.2%-60.2%-44.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-21.1%-32.2%-58.3%-78.7%-22.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-26.8%-15.8%-33.0%-68.4%-10.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+14.1%-7.3%-13.0%-26.4%-17.7%
HCSG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — HCSG and CCRN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CCRN is the less volatile stock with a 0.78 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TBI's 1.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HCSG currently trades 91.5% from its 52-week high vs BGSF's 63.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHCSG logoHCSGHealthcare Servic…BGSF logoBGSFBGSF, Inc.KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…TBI logoTBITrueBlue, Inc.CCRN logoCCRNCross Country Hea…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.12x0.95x1.01x1.13x0.78x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$24.39$8.22$14.94$7.78$14.99
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$12.66$3.20$7.98$3.18$7.43
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.5%+63.3%+64.9%+77.2%+87.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10061.829.863.783.253.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded676K22K361K386K552K
Evenly matched — HCSG and CCRN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — HCSG and BGSF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: HCSG as "Hold", KELYA as "Buy", TBI as "Buy", CCRN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 54.6% upside for KELYA (target: $15) vs -18.9% for CCRN (target: $11). For income investors, BGSF offers the higher dividend yield at 38.85% vs KELYA's 3.23%.

MetricHCSG logoHCSGHealthcare Servic…BGSF logoBGSFBGSF, Inc.KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…TBI logoTBITrueBlue, Inc.CCRN logoCCRNCross Country Hea…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$24.50$15.00$5.75$10.61
# AnalystsCovering analysts1551014
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+38.9%+3.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises201501
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.02$0.31
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.9%+2.6%+3.5%+0.6%+1.6%
Evenly matched — HCSG and BGSF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

HCSG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KELYA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallHealthcare Services Group, … (HCSG)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HCSG vs BGSF vs KELYA vs TBI vs CCRN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HCSG or BGSF or KELYA or TBI or CCRN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Healthcare Services Group, Inc.

(HCSG) is the stronger pick with 7. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -65. 8% for BGSF, Inc. (BGSF). Healthcare Services Group, Inc. (HCSG) offers the better valuation at 27. 5x trailing P/E (20. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HCSG or BGSF or KELYA or TBI or CCRN?

On forward P/E, Kelly Services, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 11. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HCSG or BGSF or KELYA or TBI or CCRN?

Over the past 5 years, Healthcare Services Group, Inc.

(HCSG) delivered a total return of -21. 1%, compared to -78. 7% for TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CCRN returned -10. 5% versus TBI's -68. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HCSG or BGSF or KELYA or TBI or CCRN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.

(CCRN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 78β versus TrueBlue, Inc. 's 1. 13β — meaning TBI is approximately 46% more volatile than CCRN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 62% for TrueBlue, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HCSG or BGSF or KELYA or TBI or CCRN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Healthcare Services Group, Inc.

(HCSG) is pulling ahead at 7. 1% versus -65. 8% for BGSF, Inc. (BGSF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TrueBlue, Inc. grew EPS 61. 4% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HCSG leads at 2. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HCSG or BGSF or KELYA or TBI or CCRN?

Healthcare Services Group, Inc.

(HCSG) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 2% net margin versus -9. 0% for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HCSG leads at 2. 6% versus -10. 0% for BGSF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BGSF leads at 34. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is HCSG or BGSF or KELYA or TBI or CCRN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Kelly Services, Inc.

(KELYA) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 133. 8x for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. — 122. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KELYA: 54. 6% to $15. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — HCSG or BGSF or KELYA or TBI or CCRN?

In this comparison, BGSF (38.

9% yield), KELYA (3. 2% yield) pay a dividend. HCSG, TBI, CCRN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is HCSG or BGSF or KELYA or TBI or CCRN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, BGSF, Inc.

(BGSF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 38. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BGSF: -15. 8%, TBI: -68. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between HCSG and BGSF and KELYA and TBI and CCRN?

These companies operate in different sectors (HCSG (Healthcare) and BGSF (Industrials) and KELYA (Industrials) and TBI (Industrials) and CCRN (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: HCSG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BGSF is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KELYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CCRN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. BGSF, KELYA pay a dividend while HCSG, TBI, CCRN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

HCSG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BGSF

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 21%
  • Dividend Yield > 15.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KELYA

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 15%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TBI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CCRN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform HCSG and BGSF and KELYA and TBI and CCRN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(HCSG: 6.6% · BGSF: -67.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.