Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HCWB vs ARQT vs NKTR vs REGN vs ABBV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
HCWB vs ARQT vs NKTR vs REGN vs ABBV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $668K | $2.58B | $1.69B | $73.68B | $358.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $54K | $416M | $55M | $14.92B | $61.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $-2M | $-164M | $4.42B | $4.23B |
| Gross Margin | -300.7% | 90.9% | 99.6% | 84.5% | 70.2% |
| Operating Margin | -215.1% | 0.8% | -237.9% | 24.3% | 26.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 77.6x | — | 15.3x | 14.3x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $6M | $149M | $2.71B | $69.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $43M | $15M | $3.12B | $5.23B |
HCWB vs ARQT vs NKTR vs REGN vs ABBV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| HCW Biologics Inc. (HCWB) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT) | 100 | 88.6 | -11.4% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 35.2 | -64.8% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 123.4 | +23.4% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 174.2 | +74.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HCWB vs ARQT vs NKTR vs REGN vs ABBV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, HCWB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ARQT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
- 91.3% revenue growth vs HCWB's -97.9%
NKTR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +8.2% vs HCWB's -95.4%
REGN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 8.7%, current ratio 4.13x
- 29.6% margin vs HCWB's -146.8%
- 11.1% ROA vs NKTR's -62.8%, ROIC 8.9% vs -57.2%
ABBV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 3.2%
- 295.5% 10Y total return vs REGN's 90.0%
- Beta 0.34, yield 3.2%, current ratio 0.67x
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 91.3% revenue growth vs HCWB's -97.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.6% margin vs HCWB's -146.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs NKTR's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs REGN's 0.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs HCWB's -95.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.1% ROA vs NKTR's -62.8%, ROIC 8.9% vs -57.2% |
HCWB vs ARQT vs NKTR vs REGN vs ABBV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HCWB vs ARQT vs NKTR vs REGN vs ABBV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ABBV leads in 3 of 6 categories
NKTR leads 1 • HCWB leads 0 • ARQT leads 0 • REGN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV is the larger business by revenue, generating $61.2B annually — 1127768.3x HCWB's $54,231. REGN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HCWB's -146.8%. On growth, ARQT holds the edge at +60.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $54,231 | $416M | $55M | $14.9B | $61.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | $6M | -$130M | $4.2B | $24.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | -$2M | -$164M | $4.4B | $4.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13M | $27M | -$209M | $4.2B | $18.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | +90.9% | +99.6% | +84.5% | +70.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -215.1% | +0.8% | -2.4% | +24.3% | +26.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -146.8% | -0.6% | -3.0% | +29.6% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -246.9% | +6.5% | -3.8% | +27.9% | +30.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -93.2% | +60.1% | -25.3% | +19.0% | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -21.1% | +55.0% | -4.5% | -7.2% | +57.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — REGN and ABBV each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.1x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 80% valuation discount to ABBV's 85.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ABBV's 15.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REGN's 17.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $668,096 | $2.6B | $1.7B | $73.7B | $358.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $2.5B | $1.8B | $73.3B | $422.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.03x | -158.92x | -8.57x | 17.09x | 85.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 77.64x | — | 15.35x | 14.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.70x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 17.78x | 14.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 12.32x | 6.87x | 30.64x | 5.14x | 5.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.24x | 13.87x | 15.66x | 2.46x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 18.06x | 20.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-4 for NKTR. ARQT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HCWB's 2.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABBV scores 6/9 vs NKTR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.9% | -1.4% | -4.0% | +14.3% | +62.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -30.3% | -0.6% | -62.8% | +11.1% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -171.1% | -5.2% | -57.2% | +8.9% | +23.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.5% | -4.3% | -55.7% | +10.2% | +21.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.46x | 0.03x | 1.66x | 0.09x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5M | -$37M | $134M | -$412M | $63.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $43M | $15M | $3.1B | $5.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $6M | $149M | $2.7B | $69.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.05x | 2.08x | -4.74x | 108.44x | 3.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $20,131 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13 for HCWB. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +818.2% total return vs HCWB's -95.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 93.3% vs HCWB's -82.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -71.4% | -28.8% | +92.0% | -8.5% | -10.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -95.4% | +50.8% | +818.2% | +27.1% | +11.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | +44.9% | +621.8% | -5.1% | +50.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -39.5% | -72.3% | +43.6% | +101.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -5.2% | -59.1% | +90.0% | +295.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -82.2% | +13.2% | +93.3% | -1.7% | +14.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — REGN and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKTR's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. REGN currently trades 86.4% from its 52-week high vs HCWB's 1.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.54x | 1.48x | 1.85x | 0.81x | 0.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.80 | $31.77 | $109.00 | $821.11 | $244.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.25 | $12.42 | $7.99 | $476.49 | $176.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.8% | +65.0% | +76.5% | +86.4% | +82.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.6 | 54.3 | 53.4 | 44.9 | 46.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10.8M | 1.3M | 991K | 631K | 5.8M |
Analyst Outlook
ABBV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ARQT as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy", REGN as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 71.8% upside for ARQT (target: $36) vs 22.1% for REGN (target: $866). For income investors, ABBV offers the higher dividend yield at 3.24% vs REGN's 0.48%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $35.50 | $132.83 | $865.68 | $256.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 33 | 48 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.5% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $3.41 | $6.57 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.4% | +0.3% |
ABBV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NKTR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
HCWB vs ARQT vs NKTR vs REGN vs ABBV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HCWB or ARQT or NKTR or REGN or ABBV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is the stronger pick with 91. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -97. 9% for HCW Biologics Inc. (HCWB). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 17. 1x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. (ARQT) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HCWB or ARQT or NKTR or REGN or ABBV?
On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the cheapest at 17. 1x versus AbbVie Inc. at 85. 5x. On forward P/E, AbbVie Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HCWB or ARQT or NKTR or REGN or ABBV?
Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) delivered a total return of +101. 3%, compared to -99. 9% for HCW Biologics Inc. (HCWB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABBV returned +295. 5% versus HCWB's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HCWB or ARQT or NKTR or REGN or ABBV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus Nektar Therapeutics's 1. 85β — meaning NKTR is approximately 446% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. (ARQT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 2% for HCW Biologics Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HCWB or ARQT or NKTR or REGN or ABBV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is pulling ahead at 91. 3% versus -97. 9% for HCW Biologics Inc. (HCWB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 88. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1280. 5% for HCW Biologics Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARQT leads at 367. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HCWB or ARQT or NKTR or REGN or ABBV?
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -146. 8% for HCW Biologics Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus -207. 6% for HCWB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HCWB or ARQT or NKTR or REGN or ABBV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) trades at 14. 3x forward P/E versus 77. 6x for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — 63. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARQT: 71. 8% to $35. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — HCWB or ARQT or NKTR or REGN or ABBV?
In this comparison, ABBV (3.
2% yield), REGN (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. HCWB, ARQT, NKTR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HCWB or ARQT or NKTR or REGN or ABBV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34), 3. 2% yield, +295. 5% 10Y return). Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +295. 5%, NKTR: -59. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HCWB and ARQT and NKTR and REGN and ABBV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HCWB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock. ABBV pays a dividend while HCWB, ARQT, NKTR, REGN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.