Asset Management
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HCXY vs KKR vs ARCC vs GBDC vs TPVG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
HCXY vs KKR vs ARCC vs GBDC vs TPVG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $3.50B | $89.45B | $13.61B | $3.43B | $243M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $492M | $19.26B | $3.15B | $871M | $97M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $339M | $2.37B | $1.15B | $205M | $-12M |
| Gross Margin | 97.6% | 41.8% | 75.7% | 81.5% | 83.5% |
| Operating Margin | 87.8% | 2.4% | 69.7% | 78.9% | 77.9% |
| Forward P/E | 12.7x | 16.4x | 9.9x | 9.2x | 6.5x |
| Total Debt | $2.30B | $54.77B | $15.99B | $4.90B | $469M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $57M | $6M | $924M | $24M | $20M |
HCXY vs KKR vs ARCC vs GBDC vs TPVG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hercules Capital, I… (HCXY) | 100 | 97.3 | -2.7% |
| KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) | 100 | 361.5 | +261.5% |
| Ares Capital Corpor… (ARCC) | 100 | 128.5 | +28.5% |
| Golub Capital BDC, … (GBDC) | 100 | 108.3 | +8.3% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 59.8 | -40.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HCXY vs KKR vs ARCC vs GBDC vs TPVG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HCXY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.49, yield 5.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.49, current ratio 5.79x
- Beta 0.49, yield 5.9%, current ratio 5.79x
- NIM 9.1% vs KKR's 0.0%
KKR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs ARCC's 139.2%
- 0.8% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs TPVG's 17.1%
Among these 5 stocks, ARCC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GBDC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.30 vs TPVG's 6.41
- 42.5% NII/revenue growth vs KKR's -11.0%
- Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs KKR's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs KKR's 0.4%
TPVG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 36.6%, EPS growth 48.8%
- Lower P/E (6.5x vs 9.9x)
- +19.3% vs KKR's -13.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 42.5% NII/revenue growth vs KKR's -11.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.5x vs 9.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs KKR's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.49 vs KKR's 1.70 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs TPVG's 17.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.3% vs KKR's -13.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs KKR's 0.4% |
HCXY vs KKR vs ARCC vs GBDC vs TPVG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
HCXY vs KKR vs ARCC vs GBDC vs TPVG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HCXY leads in 3 of 6 categories
TPVG leads 1 • KKR leads 1 • ARCC leads 0 • GBDC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HCXY leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KKR is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.3B annually — 198.1x TPVG's $97M. HCXY is the more profitable business, keeping 69.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KKR's 12.3%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $492M | $19.3B | $3.1B | $871M | $97M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $432M | $9.0B | $2.0B | $431M | -$22M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $339M | $2.4B | $1.1B | $205M | -$12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$426M | $7.5B | $1.1B | $313M | $35M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +97.6% | +41.8% | +75.7% | +81.5% | +83.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +87.8% | +2.4% | +69.7% | +78.9% | +77.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +69.1% | +12.3% | +41.3% | +43.2% | +50.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -86.6% | +49.4% | +36.3% | -13.0% | -58.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.7% | -1.7% | -63.9% | -160.0% | -2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
TPVG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 89% valuation discount to KKR's 42.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GBDC offers better value at 0.30x vs TPVG's 4.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.5B | $89.4B | $13.6B | $3.4B | $243M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.7B | $144.2B | $28.7B | $8.3B | $691M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.41x | 42.88x | 10.19x | 9.26x | 4.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.70x | 16.42x | 9.92x | 9.15x | 6.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.99x | 0.30x | 4.84x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.28x | 20.24x | 13.09x | 12.08x | 9.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.11x | 4.64x | 4.33x | 3.93x | 2.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.11x | 1.17x | 0.93x | 0.88x | 0.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.39x | 11.92x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HCXY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HCXY delivers a 15.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-3 for TPVG. KKR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TPVG's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KKR scores 6/9 vs GBDC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.8% | +3.2% | +8.1% | +5.2% | -3.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.8% | +0.6% | +3.8% | +2.3% | -1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.8% | +0.3% | +5.7% | +5.9% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.4% | +0.1% | +7.5% | +7.8% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.04x | 0.67x | 1.12x | 1.23x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.2B | $54.8B | $15.1B | $4.9B | $449M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $57M | $6M | $924M | $24M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.3B | $54.8B | $16.0B | $4.9B | $469M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 17.03x | 3.29x | 2.98x | 1.62x | -1.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KKR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KKR five years ago would be worth $17,648 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,649 for TPVG. Over the past 12 months, TPVG leads with a +19.3% total return vs KKR's -13.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KKR at 27.6% vs TPVG's -1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.1% | -22.0% | -4.9% | -0.7% | -6.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.7% | -13.0% | +0.4% | +3.3% | +19.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.6% | +107.7% | +34.2% | +35.3% | -3.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.8% | +76.5% | +47.0% | +33.2% | -13.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.5% | +715.5% | +139.2% | +61.0% | +93.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.3% | +27.6% | +10.3% | +10.6% | -1.2% |
Risk & Volatility
HCXY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HCXY is the less volatile stock with a 0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KKR's 1.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HCXY currently trades 96.5% from its 52-week high vs KKR's 65.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.49x | 1.70x | 0.77x | 0.64x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.71 | $153.87 | $23.42 | $15.63 | $7.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.93 | $82.67 | $17.40 | $11.77 | $4.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.5% | +65.2% | +81.0% | +84.1% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.1 | 52.4 | 56.7 | 52.8 | 58.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 6.5M | 7.5M | 2.4M | 504K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KKR and TPVG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KKR as "Buy", ARCC as "Buy", GBDC as "Buy", TPVG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 49.4% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs 9.0% for GBDC (target: $14). For income investors, TPVG offers the higher dividend yield at 17.11% vs KKR's 0.80%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $143.00 | $21.88 | $14.33 | $8.95 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 26 | 32 | 11 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.9% | +0.8% | +2.0% | +10.5% | +17.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.46 | $0.80 | $0.38 | $1.38 | $1.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +2.3% | 0.0% |
HCXY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TPVG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
HCXY vs KKR vs ARCC vs GBDC vs TPVG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HCXY or KKR or ARCC or GBDC or TPVG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
(GBDC) is the stronger pick with 42. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HCXY or KKR or ARCC or GBDC or TPVG?
On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 9x versus KKR & Co. Inc. at 42. 9x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Golub Capital BDC, Inc. wins at 0. 30x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 41x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HCXY or KKR or ARCC or GBDC or TPVG?
Over the past 5 years, KKR & Co.
Inc. (KKR) delivered a total return of +76. 5%, compared to -13. 5% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KKR returned +715. 5% versus HCXY's +52. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HCXY or KKR or ARCC or GBDC or TPVG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hercules Capital, Inc.
(HCXY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 49β versus KKR & Co. Inc. 's 1. 70β — meaning KKR is approximately 250% more volatile than HCXY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 133% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HCXY or KKR or ARCC or GBDC or TPVG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
(GBDC) is pulling ahead at 42. 5% versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. grew EPS 48. 8% year-over-year, compared to -28. 7% for KKR & Co. Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HCXY or KKR or ARCC or GBDC or TPVG?
Hercules Capital, Inc.
(HCXY) is the more profitable company, earning 69. 1% net margin versus 12. 3% for KKR & Co. Inc. — meaning it keeps 69. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HCXY leads at 87. 8% versus 2. 4% for KKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HCXY leads at 97. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HCXY or KKR or ARCC or GBDC or TPVG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 30x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 41x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) trades at 6. 5x forward P/E versus 16. 4x for KKR & Co. Inc. — 9. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 49. 4% to $8. 95.
08Which pays a better dividend — HCXY or KKR or ARCC or GBDC or TPVG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the highest yield at 17. 1%, versus 0. 8% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR).
09Is HCXY or KKR or ARCC or GBDC or TPVG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hercules Capital, Inc.
(HCXY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 49), 5. 9% yield). KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) carries a higher beta of 1. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HCXY: +52. 5%, KKR: +715. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HCXY and KKR and ARCC and GBDC and TPVG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HCXY is a small-cap high-growth stock; KKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ARCC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GBDC is a small-cap high-growth stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.