Restaurants
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HDL vs RRGB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
HDL vs RRGB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $7.83B | $81M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $805M | $1.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $55M | $-23M |
| Gross Margin | 29.0% | 26.8% |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | 0.2% |
| Forward P/E | 20.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $213M | $514M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $255M | $20M |
HDL vs RRGB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SUPER HI INTERNATIO… (HDL) | 100 | 66.9 | -33.1% |
| Red Robin Gourmet B… (RRGB) | 100 | 45.3 | -54.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HDL vs RRGB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HDL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.25
- Rev growth 13.4%, EPS growth -17.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.6%
- -39.1% 10Y total return vs RRGB's -94.4%
RRGB is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Better valuation composite
- +34.9% vs HDL's -35.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.4% revenue growth vs RRGB's -3.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.8% margin vs RRGB's -1.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.25 vs RRGB's 2.10 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.9% vs HDL's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.8% ROA vs RRGB's -4.1%, ROIC 45.9% vs 0.5% |
HDL vs RRGB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HDL vs RRGB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HDL leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RRGB is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 1.5x HDL's $805M. HDL is the more profitable business, keeping 6.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RRGB's -1.9%. On growth, HDL holds the edge at +9.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $805M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $255M | $54M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $55M | -$23M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $73M | $6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.0% | +26.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.0% | +0.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | -1.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | +0.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.1% | -5.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +77.4% |
Valuation Metrics
RRGB leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, RRGB's 10.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HDL's 32.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.8B | $81M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.8B | $575M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 359.26x | -2.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.18x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 32.42x | 10.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.05x | 0.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 21.66x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 92.19x | 13.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HDL leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HDL scores 6/9 vs RRGB's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.6% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.8% | -4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +45.9% | +0.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +39.1% | +0.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$42M | $494M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $255M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $213M | $514M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.48x | 0.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HDL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HDL five years ago would be worth $6,092 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,032 for RRGB. Over the past 12 months, RRGB leads with a +34.9% total return vs HDL's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HDL at -15.2% vs RRGB's -33.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.4% | -11.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -35.3% | +34.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.1% | -70.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.1% | -89.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.1% | -94.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.2% | -33.4% |
Risk & Volatility
HDL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HDL is the less volatile stock with a 0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RRGB's 2.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HDL currently trades 57.5% from its 52-week high vs RRGB's 46.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.25x | 2.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.62 | $7.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.06 | $2.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.5% | +46.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.4 | 51.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1K | 384K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HDL as "Buy" and RRGB as "Hold".
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
HDL leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RRGB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
HDL vs RRGB: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HDL or RRGB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SUPER HI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING Ltd.
American Depositary Shares (HDL) is the stronger pick with 13. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (RRGB). SUPER HI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING Ltd. American Depositary Shares (HDL) offers the better valuation at 359. 3x trailing P/E (20. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SUPER HI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING Ltd. American Depositary Shares (HDL) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HDL or RRGB?
Over the past 5 years, SUPER HI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING Ltd.
American Depositary Shares (HDL) delivered a total return of -39. 1%, compared to -89. 7% for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (RRGB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HDL returned -39. 1% versus RRGB's -94. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HDL or RRGB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SUPER HI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING Ltd.
American Depositary Shares (HDL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 25β versus Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. 's 2. 10β — meaning RRGB is approximately 748% more volatile than HDL relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — HDL or RRGB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SUPER HI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING Ltd.
American Depositary Shares (HDL) is pulling ahead at 13. 4% versus -3. 1% for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (RRGB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. grew EPS 73. 4% year-over-year, compared to -17. 8% for SUPER HI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING Ltd. American Depositary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, HDL leads at 35. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — HDL or RRGB?
SUPER HI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING Ltd.
American Depositary Shares (HDL) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 8% net margin versus -1. 9% for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HDL leads at 25. 2% versus 0. 2% for RRGB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RRGB leads at 68. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — HDL or RRGB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is HDL or RRGB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SUPER HI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING Ltd.
American Depositary Shares (HDL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 25)). Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (RRGB) carries a higher beta of 2. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HDL: -39. 1%, RRGB: -94. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between HDL and RRGB?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.