Restaurants
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HDL vs YUMC vs BJRI vs TXRH vs DENN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
HDL vs YUMC vs BJRI vs TXRH vs DENN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $7.83B | $16.90B | $859M | $10.41B | $322M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $805M | $12.09B | $1.41B | $6.06B | $457M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $55M | $946M | $44M | $415M | $10M |
| Gross Margin | 29.0% | 17.2% | 74.7% | 18.7% | 43.8% |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | 11.8% | 3.0% | 8.2% | 8.4% |
| Forward P/E | 20.2x | 16.6x | 17.5x | 25.0x | 15.0x |
| Total Debt | $213M | $2.35B | $491M | $1.89B | $408M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $255M | $506M | $24M | $135M | $2M |
HDL vs YUMC vs BJRI vs TXRH vs DENN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SUPER HI INTERNATIO… (HDL) | 100 | 66.9 | -33.1% |
| Yum China Holdings,… (YUMC) | 100 | 134.5 | +34.5% |
| BJ's Restaurants, I… (BJRI) | 100 | 116.7 | +16.7% |
| Texas Roadhouse, In… (TXRH) | 100 | 91.5 | -8.5% |
| Denny's Corporation (DENN) | 100 | 85.2 | -14.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HDL vs YUMC vs BJRI vs TXRH vs DENN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HDL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 13.4%, EPS growth -17.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.25, Low D/E 58.8%, current ratio 2.51x
- 13.4% revenue growth vs DENN's -2.5%
- Beta 0.25 vs BJRI's 1.40, lower leverage
YUMC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 2.0%
- Beta 0.63, yield 2.0%, current ratio 1.05x
- 7.8% margin vs DENN's 2.2%
- 2.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs TXRH's 1.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, BJRI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TXRH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 288.0% 10Y total return vs YUMC's 105.5%
- PEG 1.17 vs YUMC's 3.27
- Better valuation composite
- 12.2% ROA vs DENN's 2.0%, ROIC 14.5% vs 9.7%
DENN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +39.8% vs HDL's -35.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.4% revenue growth vs DENN's -2.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.8% margin vs DENN's 2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.25 vs BJRI's 1.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs TXRH's 1.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.8% vs HDL's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.2% ROA vs DENN's 2.0%, ROIC 14.5% vs 9.7% |
HDL vs YUMC vs BJRI vs TXRH vs DENN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
HDL vs YUMC vs BJRI vs TXRH vs DENN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HDL leads in 1 of 6 categories
TXRH leads 1 • YUMC leads 1 • BJRI leads 0 • DENN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HDL and YUMC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YUMC is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.1B annually — 26.4x DENN's $457M. YUMC is the more profitable business, keeping 7.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DENN's 2.2%. On growth, TXRH holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $805M | $12.1B | $1.4B | $6.1B | $457M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $255M | $1.9B | $123M | $709M | $55M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $55M | $946M | $44M | $415M | $10M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $73M | $1.1B | $80M | $441M | $2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.0% | +17.2% | +74.7% | +18.7% | +43.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.0% | +11.8% | +3.0% | +8.2% | +8.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +7.8% | +3.1% | +6.8% | +2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | +9.0% | +5.7% | +7.3% | +0.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.1% | +9.7% | +2.9% | +12.8% | +1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +13.0% | -29.3% | +10.0% | -89.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — YUMC and BJRI and DENN each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.2x trailing earnings, DENN trades at a 96% valuation discount to HDL's 359.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TXRH offers better value at 0.38x vs YUMC's 3.78x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.8B | $16.9B | $859M | $10.4B | $322M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.8B | $18.7B | $1.3B | $12.2B | $728M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 359.26x | 19.24x | 18.93x | 25.89x | 15.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.18x | 16.64x | 17.51x | 25.05x | 15.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.78x | — | 0.38x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 32.42x | 9.83x | 10.79x | 17.15x | 12.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.05x | 1.43x | 0.61x | 1.77x | 0.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 21.66x | 2.83x | 2.53x | 7.09x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 92.19x | 20.11x | 21.01x | 30.44x | 350.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HDL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TXRH delivers a 37.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $12 for BJRI. YUMC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BJRI's 1.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), YUMC scores 7/9 vs TXRH's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.6% | +15.1% | +12.0% | +37.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.8% | +8.7% | +4.4% | +12.2% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +45.9% | +13.6% | +4.1% | +14.5% | +9.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +39.1% | +16.8% | +5.5% | +20.1% | +11.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 0.38x | 1.34x | 1.27x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$42M | $1.8B | $467M | $1.8B | $406M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $255M | $506M | $24M | $135M | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $213M | $2.3B | $491M | $1.9B | $408M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.48x | — | 15.28x | — | 1.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TXRH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TXRH five years ago would be worth $16,160 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,507 for DENN. Over the past 12 months, DENN leads with a +39.8% total return vs HDL's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TXRH at 15.4% vs DENN's -16.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.4% | +0.5% | -0.5% | -7.4% | +0.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -35.3% | +13.0% | +9.0% | -6.2% | +39.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.1% | -18.5% | +36.4% | +53.6% | -41.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.1% | -17.3% | -31.2% | +61.6% | -64.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.1% | +105.5% | -6.3% | +288.0% | -42.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.2% | -6.6% | +10.9% | +15.4% | -16.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HDL and DENN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HDL is the less volatile stock with a 0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BJRI's 1.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DENN currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs HDL's 57.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.25x | 0.63x | 1.40x | 0.70x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.62 | $58.39 | $47.02 | $199.99 | $6.26 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.06 | $41.69 | $28.46 | $153.82 | $3.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.5% | +82.4% | +86.9% | +79.0% | +99.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.4 | 47.4 | 61.1 | 45.7 | 66.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1K | 1.5M | 366K | 983K | 0 |
Analyst Outlook
YUMC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HDL as "Buy", YUMC as "Buy", BJRI as "Buy", TXRH as "Hold", DENN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.7% upside for YUMC (target: $59) vs -4.0% for DENN (target: $6). For income investors, YUMC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.04% vs TXRH's 1.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $59.05 | $40.50 | $191.64 | $6.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 19 | 31 | 43 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.0% | — | +1.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.98 | — | $2.71 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.8% | +7.9% | +1.4% | +3.6% |
HDL leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). TXRH leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
HDL vs YUMC vs BJRI vs TXRH vs DENN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HDL or YUMC or BJRI or TXRH or DENN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SUPER HI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING Ltd.
American Depositary Shares (HDL) is the stronger pick with 13. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 5% for Denny's Corporation (DENN). Denny's Corporation (DENN) offers the better valuation at 15. 2x trailing P/E (15. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SUPER HI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING Ltd. American Depositary Shares (HDL) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HDL or YUMC or BJRI or TXRH or DENN?
On trailing P/E, Denny's Corporation (DENN) is the cheapest at 15.
2x versus SUPER HI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING Ltd. American Depositary Shares at 359. 3x. On forward P/E, Denny's Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Texas Roadhouse, Inc. wins at 1. 17x versus Yum China Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 27x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HDL or YUMC or BJRI or TXRH or DENN?
Over the past 5 years, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) delivered a total return of +61. 6%, compared to -64. 9% for Denny's Corporation (DENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TXRH returned +288. 0% versus DENN's -42. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HDL or YUMC or BJRI or TXRH or DENN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SUPER HI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING Ltd.
American Depositary Shares (HDL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 25β versus BJ's Restaurants, Inc. 's 1. 40β — meaning BJRI is approximately 467% more volatile than HDL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 134% for BJ's Restaurants, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HDL or YUMC or BJRI or TXRH or DENN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SUPER HI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING Ltd.
American Depositary Shares (HDL) is pulling ahead at 13. 4% versus -2. 5% for Denny's Corporation (DENN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BJ's Restaurants, Inc. grew EPS 208. 6% year-over-year, compared to -17. 8% for SUPER HI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING Ltd. American Depositary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, HDL leads at 35. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HDL or YUMC or BJRI or TXRH or DENN?
Yum China Holdings, Inc.
(YUMC) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 9% net margin versus 2. 8% for SUPER HI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING Ltd. American Depositary Shares — meaning it keeps 7. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HDL leads at 25. 2% versus 3. 3% for BJRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BJRI leads at 74. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HDL or YUMC or BJRI or TXRH or DENN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 17x versus Yum China Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 27x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Denny's Corporation (DENN) trades at 15. 0x forward P/E versus 25. 0x for Texas Roadhouse, Inc. — 10. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for YUMC: 22. 7% to $59. 05.
08Which pays a better dividend — HDL or YUMC or BJRI or TXRH or DENN?
In this comparison, YUMC (2.
0% yield), TXRH (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. HDL, BJRI, DENN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HDL or YUMC or BJRI or TXRH or DENN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 70), 1. 7% yield, +288. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXRH: +288. 0%, BJRI: -6. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HDL and YUMC and BJRI and TXRH and DENN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HDL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; YUMC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BJRI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TXRH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DENN is a small-cap deep-value stock. YUMC, TXRH pay a dividend while HDL, BJRI, DENN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.